|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
28 Oct 2012, 17:52 (Ref:3159103) | #4351 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,056
|
Quote:
WHAT!!!!!...Audi's 'E-Tron Hybrid System isn't a patch on the Toyota Denso System!!!! Let alone beat the all-mighty Diesels with a normally asperated non Turbo Gasoline engine! Once again...WELL DONE TMG-DENSO FANTASTIC Work...Ingenious, Technology, and in only your 'Toe-in-the water' year! Roll on a two car team in 2013. Last edited by Rennen; 28 Oct 2012 at 18:09. |
|||
|
28 Oct 2012, 18:01 (Ref:3159104) | #4352 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
This is my earlier comment.
Quote:
|
||
|
28 Oct 2012, 18:22 (Ref:3159117) | #4353 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,069
|
21 is a nice logical number of points for first place. Very solid season for Rebellion. Obviously a couple of results hurt them but, like at Le Mans, they couldn't have done much more to be honest.
I'm not really sure how much value they will attach to third/fourth in the drivers championship. Well done to Toyota. That's the standard FIA points system and they earned that third spot. |
|
|
28 Oct 2012, 18:39 (Ref:3159129) | #4354 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
||
|
28 Oct 2012, 19:33 (Ref:3159159) | #4355 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Well , considering who was 1st , 2nd & 3rd , I reckon they should be well pleased with themselves .
|
||
|
29 Oct 2012, 00:15 (Ref:3159273) | #4356 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,613
|
Whether it's more advanced or not, the Toyota certainly is faster around the track. If they can make a reliable dedicated engine next season just imagine what they could do! To the casual viewer, both cars look like race cars. The Audi says E-tron while the Toyota says Hybrid. Which company is the pioneer of hybrid technology on the road? That would be Toyota. If that's related from race to road, I say Toyota gets a better return if they're promoting hybrid technology.
Forgive my ignorance but if were talking about being more 'technologically advanced', wouldn't it go to the system which is 'better'? While Audi may have a more technical engine which uses a turbo and diesel fuel, Toyota's hybrid system is stronger. So IMO they cancel eachother out. But I have no doubt that Toyota could make an engine just as advanced and Audi could use a hybrid system just as advanced. Hopefully 2014 shows this with the regs being more open. |
|
|
29 Oct 2012, 00:23 (Ref:3159276) | #4357 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,613
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Oct 2012, 00:45 (Ref:3159284) | #4358 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
I just don't agree with his bold statement of "the most sophisticated and most technically advanced racing car".
For instance, the Lola Drayson B12/69EV is also an extremely advanced car: 4 electric motors, 850 hp, lithium nanophosphate battery, wireless charging, active aerodynamics, energy recovery from dampers, ... |
|
|
29 Oct 2012, 08:03 (Ref:3159377) | #4359 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,613
|
But where does it race and is it even allowed? To me a 'racing car' is a car that's actually racing, not just a testlab vehicle. If the rules allowed, you would see Toyota and Audi make cars that're equally as advanced as anything allowed. Because, it's what all they're allowed.
|
|
|
29 Oct 2012, 09:11 (Ref:3159406) | #4360 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The car is used as test bed for their 2013 Formula E car. Of course this is pretty
I just wanted to show that there are other advanced race cars out there and hence the TS030 is not necessarily the most sophisticated race car of all time. |
|
|
29 Oct 2012, 19:09 (Ref:3159711) | #4361 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,056
|
Quote:
The Toyota engine is a Proper Racing Engine that Sounds and goes like a Racing Engine and it doesn't even need Turbo Charger to beat a Diesel!...Diesels are for Lorries and Tractors! TMG's monoque is just as advanced and is made in house, not outscourced, and their wind tunnel is the best in the business...even Ferrari F1 use it! A Gearbox...is a Gearbox! As for the Peugoet...it's an Unproven, Unraced 'Dead Duck' ! My friend, the name of the game is winning races...and this is only the test year for the TS030. Last edited by Rennen; 29 Oct 2012 at 19:17. |
|||
|
29 Oct 2012, 19:42 (Ref:3159726) | #4362 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
It may be a test year for Toyota (and I commend them for stepping up and doing so in a spectacular fashion) but Audi is no slouch, I fully expect them to turn the wick up to 11 next year. More importantly, Toyota need to sort out that 'Proper Racing Engine' that couldn't last past 8 hours or Le Mans will be the same story as 2012. |
||
|
29 Oct 2012, 20:14 (Ref:3159737) | #4363 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Considering Le Mans was the team's first race, I cannot get too upset that they didn't foresee some of the issues (which might have been crash-related.) I had heard that they will have a new motor for 2013 anyway.
My hope is that they are successful enough in 2013 to invest for a few years of the new 2014 formula. Porsche, Audi, and Toyota at the same time would be wonderful. |
|
|
29 Oct 2012, 20:46 (Ref:3159748) | #4364 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Anyway, Audi could probably drive on electric power in the pit lane. However, the 120 km/h rule prohibits Audi from doing so. In fact, this is even a requirement in the rules for hybrid cars. Quote:
Quote:
BTW Audi tests their cars in the Sauber wind tunnel, which is considered to be rather decent as well. The R18 is the first endurance race car with a carbon-fiber composite casing. Some consider this a technical accomplishment. EDIT: I move the discussion away from the Shanghai race thread. |
||||
|
30 Oct 2012, 01:10 (Ref:3159879) | #4365 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
I don't think enough has been made of Audi's gearbox, taking technology that's designed within a sprinting ethos, and applying that to endurance racing and making it work 4 times at Le Mans, is really something in my opinion.
|
||
|
30 Oct 2012, 13:11 (Ref:3160122) | #4366 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
According to JBpress,
Toyota has noticed that they have not fully used up the capacity of fuel tank after the Silverstone round. They improved the fuel tank before the Brazil round. http://jbpress.ismedia.jp/articles/-/36388 |
|
|
30 Oct 2012, 13:24 (Ref:3160124) | #4367 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,404
|
Pascal vasselon told me in Brazil that they had run a VERY conservative fuel strategy at Silverstone, always leaving rsather more than a lap of fuel in the tank.
|
||
|
30 Oct 2012, 14:39 (Ref:3160154) | #4368 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Or not successful? It has been asked many times that are they more likely to continue if they win LM next, or more likely to continue if they don't (incentive). It sucks that this is a question in the first place. Tells something about the attractiveness of the sport.
|
|
|
31 Oct 2012, 10:48 (Ref:3160551) | #4369 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
|
||
|
1 Nov 2012, 19:25 (Ref:3161171) | #4370 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,069
|
Not amazingly happy to see Vasselon quoted in today's Autosport as saying they are aiming for two cars in the WEC and two at Le Mans.
Everything is still clearly up for negotiation with the men holding the briefcases. |
|
|
1 Nov 2012, 19:29 (Ref:3161173) | #4371 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Maybe just not promising something he fears he can't hold?
|
||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
1 Nov 2012, 19:45 (Ref:3161180) | #4372 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
Is this their first public admission they're looking at 2 full time WEC cars? If so, good news. I know it's been speculated for quite some time. The pain of losing Peugeot is a distant memory to me now. Full marks to Toyota for what they did this year. The WEC would have been a lot less successful (and a snoozefest for the overall race wins) without their legitimate effort IMO.
|
||
|
1 Nov 2012, 20:10 (Ref:3161199) | #4373 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,069
|
Wasn't an admission it was what he hoped. Still nothing confirmed yet. Sounds like the programme will be announced later this month.
|
|
|
1 Nov 2012, 20:14 (Ref:3161201) | #4374 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Almost forgot that December/January is the normal "present" months for sportscar fans with programs announced and the first spy shots appears.
|
||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
1 Nov 2012, 22:50 (Ref:3161284) | #4375 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] Toyota plans Le Mans return with hybrid! | Bentley03 | 24 Heures du Mans | 424 | 8 Nov 2010 19:56 |
[LM24] Best LMP1/LMP900/LMGTP Manufacturer of the '00s at Le Mans | Danny_GT2 | 24 Heures du Mans | 11 | 11 Aug 2009 18:26 |
[LM24] Acura Heading to Le Mans in 2008 and LMP1 in 2009 | Mal | 24 Heures du Mans | 45 | 11 Jul 2007 23:05 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |