|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 May 2024, 01:15 (Ref:4210849) | #451 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,199
|
Quote:
Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
29 May 2024, 03:31 (Ref:4210853) | #452 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,752
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
29 May 2024, 08:18 (Ref:4210868) | #453 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,704
|
Quote:
Think it’s actually up to 24 (12 teams) & don’t disagree with you but my point is that MBS now appears to have backed down completely & is not advocating an additional team - lot of angst would have been prevented if he’d been consistent with that position from the start, whether or not we agree with it. Quite extraordinarily weak in my view & agree with others that he’s trying to curry votes for his re-election. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
29 May 2024, 08:41 (Ref:4210874) | #454 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,815
|
Quote:
I disagree. He should stick by what he said. It’s not his fault F1 and its teams are so elitist. Quite frankly we need more teams to give more drivers opportunities. 20 on the grid isn’t enough |
||
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
29 May 2024, 11:15 (Ref:4210891) | #455 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,704
|
You're actually agreeing with me. I'm saying that he's been inconsistent and changed his position. To me, he either should have been for or against additional teams and should hold the same position now - completely irresponsible and weak to change horses after a number of teams (not just Andretti) put in the work to apply, based on the FIA encouraging them and opening applications.
|
||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
29 May 2024, 13:24 (Ref:4210903) | #456 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,199
|
Quote:
Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
29 May 2024, 22:42 (Ref:4210940) | #457 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,704
|
Quote:
Neither professional nor a good look for the head of the governing body to backflip like he has, but I guess it proves that he's a political animal and like all of them, trust is a scarce commodity. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
29 May 2024, 23:40 (Ref:4210941) | #458 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,353
|
Starting to have that ' life imitating art' feel to it... Phantom Menace, perhaps?
" a vote of no confidence in Mohammed Ben Sulayem's leadership"... |
||
__________________
Here's to the new age of Sports car/Prototypes... |
30 May 2024, 00:16 (Ref:4210947) | #459 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,952
|
|||
__________________
Part time wingman, full time spud. |
30 May 2024, 05:29 (Ref:4210956) | #460 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,518
|
Alpine Looking For Post-2026 Engine Supply
Andretti has an engine. Alpine is looking for an engine. Sorted…. |
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
30 May 2024, 10:28 (Ref:4210971) | #461 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
Quote:
|
||
|
30 May 2024, 10:36 (Ref:4210972) | #462 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,588
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 May 2024, 15:55 (Ref:4211015) | #463 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,704
|
Quote:
If Renault is in fact getting out of the engine business, then Andretti (on the face of it) has zero chance of being on the grid prior to 2028 as a new team in its own right. Maybe the FOM crew were aware of doubts about Renault engines when the decision was made on Andretti but couldn't say so due to any indications from Renault being in confidence? |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
30 May 2024, 16:46 (Ref:4211020) | #464 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,022
|
Elitist?!
How so? They have seen teams beyond 10th place go bankrupt over and over again (Caterham, Hispania, Manor... Arrows, Prost etc), and don't want to repeat that. Surely that's reasonable not elitist?! Knowing that prize money goes to the top 10 WCC only, they don't want to be in that position, which is reasonable. I'm in favour of 13 teams/26 cars (or pre-qualifying with 40 entries, sure why not), but the other teams will only want that if it doesn't financially penalise them and there can be a stable foundation that keeps all of these teams solvent. |
|
|
30 May 2024, 16:51 (Ref:4211021) | #465 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,022
|
Quote:
Why not start a breakaway Grand Prix series? The money they are intended to spend, would go a long way towards a Andretti-Cosworth V10 (or Cadillac 5.5 V8 if they want) spec series with names like de Vries, Pourchaire, Drugovich etc! [Do they suspect that would be akin to setting $500m on fire? But are they racers and all about the racing or not?!] Or it could be a "non-elitist" open formula Grand Prix series with pre-qualifying for all these constructors who are (supposedly) desperate to enter Formula One! No elitist commercial contracts, just arrive with your car, pre-qualify and race. Why not enter WEC? Why not enter Formula 2 and Formula 3? To start with why doesn't Andretti gain experience mass-producing racing cars, by tendering for the 2027-2028 Indycar or advoating for Indycar to go a multi-make formula? There could be a regulatory relationship between the new Grand Prix World Series and the American Indycar series -- perhaps they could arrange to use the same chassis and engines? To the contrary, instead of Andretti being motivated by a desire to build and race their own Grand Prix cars -- which they could do in a breakaway series with like-minded constructors, they seem instead to be motivated by a desire to extract commercial value from Formula One (please correct me if I'm mistaken). Existing Formula One constructors are therefore not best pleased about the commensurate losss of commercial value and team value they would experience due to that! Given the sums of money Andretti intends to spend, that should be more than enough to avoid this commercial conflict and start their own Grand Prix series instead, surely? Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 30 May 2024 at 17:05. |
||
|
30 May 2024, 20:54 (Ref:4211042) | #466 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
||
|
31 May 2024, 01:11 (Ref:4211060) | #467 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,257
|
I dont think anyone believes there is a market for yet another open wheel series. indy, f1, f2, f3, academy, etc plus all the national series
You would need to arrange venues, broadcasters etc etc. We had that world series a decade back where the teams represented countries. that fizzed. Like it or not F1 is the big game now, and Andretti wants to play with the big boys and girls. |
||
__________________
Bathurst 1977, best day of my childhood Worst thing ever to happen to Ford Aust Motorsport. |
31 May 2024, 01:15 (Ref:4211061) | #468 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,257
|
I find the "Quality not quantity" argument stupid.
Saying we dont want another backmarker struggling, who may go bankrupt or pull out. I seem to remember a certain energy drink team struggling at first. Similarly I remember the big W used to be Frankly unbeatable. All teams struggle some seasons and do well others. Thats the nature of sports. TO say you can only enter if you can prove you will immediately do well, is the best catch there is. |
||
__________________
Bathurst 1977, best day of my childhood Worst thing ever to happen to Ford Aust Motorsport. |
31 May 2024, 02:05 (Ref:4211068) | #469 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,022
|
||
|
31 May 2024, 03:48 (Ref:4211073) | #470 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,752
|
|||
|
31 May 2024, 05:56 (Ref:4211076) | #471 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
||
|
31 May 2024, 07:16 (Ref:4211078) | #472 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,815
|
We need more teams. F1 is too closed shop atm. Quite a few teams have fallen by the wayside that shouldn't.
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
31 May 2024, 08:00 (Ref:4211084) | #473 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 869
|
Post #467 is presumably alluding to A1GP .It also didn't mention Super Formula,which is hugely competitive.I can understand why the current owners of struggling teams might resist having another entity to beat,while maintaining an artificially high valuation for their own team.It means they continue to enjoy a decent revenue stream while not really being forced to make a leap forward.It also says a lot for their confidence in their workforce that they don't seem to believe they could beat a new team with no experience of designing and building their own cars.I'd like to see this complacency shaken up and I's like to see more cars on the grid.To distort an old analogy,the plan seems to be -if you can't stand the heat,sell the kitchen for an inflated price.
|
|
|
31 May 2024, 08:46 (Ref:4211092) | #474 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,588
|
|||
|
31 May 2024, 20:06 (Ref:4211157) | #475 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,030
|
Quote:
I believe I have seen mentioned some of the backers own other pro sports teams so I would imagine these are people/groups with deep pockets…probably pockets deep enough and experience in their field that they should be used to coming into a new sports franchise by making a much bigger splash than what this current bid is offering? Also since being rejected have they upped the ante with their bid?rather, why aren’t these partners offering up a lot more…even more if they want to start their own shingle from scratch? to secure a new NFL franchise, aside from having all the money, you need to be able to bring in a new state of the art multi billion stadium in an incredibly lucrative market, and of course pay off all the existing owners. What would the F1 equivalent be? Obviously bringing in a leading auto manu to the table at a bare minimum. Clearly bringing in a famous racing name like in the old days doesn’t count for much? Create a new standard in team facilities like a next gen Woking, take over an old circuit and promote a race like RB but this time in like central London? get sponsors on the level of Apple or other major global brands that have never crossed over into F1 before? what exactly would be the type of deal that would get F1 to acquiesce for an 11th team? I suspect it would have to be at least a couple of billion more in both spending and value added than what is currently on offer. As sad as it is to say, is this Andretti group even in the right ballpark when it comes to offer size? |
|||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Andretti...Montoya...Andretti...Montoya! | macdaddy | ChampCar World Series | 33 | 9 Dec 2003 06:03 |
Andretti Green: Kannan, Franchitti & Andretti!!!! | Down F0rce | IRL Indycar Series | 9 | 19 Sep 2002 07:49 |