|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Apr 2010, 13:08 (Ref:2673623) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
If we are to believe this press release, the Norma is in the final stages of assembly, so we might see it at Spa before Le Mans.
|
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
4 May 2010, 14:26 (Ref:2684301) | #27 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 30
|
||
|
4 May 2010, 14:34 (Ref:2684304) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
It looks very "normal" and not any big revolutions in design!
But looks good!, a good delivery on that would make a fine looking car! |
||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
4 May 2010, 15:12 (Ref:2684320) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Wonder if they will run on the Dunlops it is wearing?
L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
4 May 2010, 17:05 (Ref:2684368) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
It looks very unprepared for a 24 hour sprint !!!
Sadly , very little faith from my side for this LM effort . |
||
|
4 May 2010, 17:42 (Ref:2684385) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
I thought they were building a coupe? Mariantic had some computer generated images of a red M200 that was closed top. Regardless, the actual car looks much nice than the rendering of the coupe.
|
||
|
4 May 2010, 19:55 (Ref:2684456) | #32 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,625
|
New cars are going to have teething problems, especially if the manufacturer is new to the category. But it does have a Judd in it, and that is a pretty solid lump, so that is at least 1 variable you don't have to worry about.
|
||
|
4 May 2010, 20:34 (Ref:2684469) | #33 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
I don't blame a small manufacturer like Norma for choosing an open top, surely it's much less to worry about designing/building.
|
|
|
4 May 2010, 21:20 (Ref:2684492) | #34 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
Marrying it up to a gearbox , cooling , suspension and aero . Its just too new for Le Mans . |
|||
|
4 May 2010, 22:39 (Ref:2684532) | #35 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,625
|
That may be true. Wish they had the car prior to the start of the LMS season so they could have run it a bit.
|
||
|
5 May 2010, 16:05 (Ref:2684864) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
That Im sure was the idea .
But comon ..... lets be honest . For a chassis to do a half reasonable job it should have a lot of testing and development done prior to Le Mans . Unlessof course , you happen to be McLaren or some other factory or factory backed team ..... and they usually teast the head off it also . I dont mean to take away from their efforts , but , I honestly cant see anything good (at Le Mans) coming from this effort at all . How many proper efforts have sailed onto the rocks at Le Mans within the first hour , even with a proper R&D progamme behind them ? |
||
|
5 May 2010, 18:25 (Ref:2684946) | #37 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
6 May 2010, 15:05 (Ref:2685412) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Start somewhere I agree , but not at the worlds biggest sportscar race , and 24 hours to boot .
For example ..... why was KSM for example , so far down the entry list , at least its a well proven chassis they have . We also dont know exactly who was refused an entry for a start . You said "if" ..... thats my worry . Im the ACO's own words ..... selection will be chosen on Pedigree amongst other things . Now , where is the pedigree ? Again .... dont get me wrong , and Im not slating them , just feel that its a bit much to expect from a stonking new chassis-engine-gearbox combo , with no testing behind it . Reminds me of the last BRM effort . Even Oreca/Reynard had a bad start , one chassis out on lap 1 ..... and that was Oreca . |
||
|
6 May 2010, 15:08 (Ref:2685415) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Let's not forget, we are talking about the French here, and French logic can, at times, be... rather questionable.
People who were refused an entry? I'd think about several WR entries under various Welter names, teams running Lucchinis, Giovanni Lavaggi... |
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
6 May 2010, 15:46 (Ref:2685434) | #40 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
But if the rumors about Pescarolo are true, then KSM is in, and there is no one else on the Prototype Reserve list. Of Course at Le Mans, it seems unprofessional by the ACO to let a car that new race, but i welcome them as there seems to be no real replacement?. Has there ever been published a "rejection list"?. But a fact is that ACO seems to allow 1 or 2 "crazy" entries per year. Dome both last year and this year was crazy in the way that it was entered by small unknown teams which hadn't even tested the already build car. And perhaps this is a part of the Le Mans spirit, where small teams with questionable material fight for completing the 24hours, and doing there best with a margin of a budget of the bigger teams. |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
6 May 2010, 18:02 (Ref:2685505) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,356
|
Isnt this what Le Mans 24hr racing is all about? I know we have the factory teams, who will undoubtedly win overall, and we have the privateer who against all the odds manages to race for 24hrs to finish, a true endurance effort.
Good luck to em! Or is this just a "British" thing? |
||
__________________
There goes My Hero. Hes ordinary.....(Dave Grohl c1995) An I/O's brief should be like a miniskirt, short enough to hold the attention but long enough to cover the important bits! |
6 May 2010, 19:01 (Ref:2685547) | #42 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
7 May 2010, 00:01 (Ref:2685722) | #43 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 494
|
It's not like they are completely in-experienced. Norma has produced chassis before and Pegasus has been running a semi-successful team for several years now. They have a reputation of finishing events, even if they are usually not the fastest.
I am 'hopeful' they will be more than just another Jloc. dh |
||
|
7 May 2010, 08:09 (Ref:2685831) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,356
|
|||
__________________
There goes My Hero. Hes ordinary.....(Dave Grohl c1995) An I/O's brief should be like a miniskirt, short enough to hold the attention but long enough to cover the important bits! |
21 May 2010, 19:00 (Ref:2695615) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Photos from the car's shakedown test at Nogaro from Endurance-Info: http://www.endurance-info.com/versio...ance-4444.html
Also, another French car was being shaken down there as well... a pretty special old one at that. |
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
21 May 2010, 21:15 (Ref:2695675) | #46 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
Now the car is out , lets see what they can do with it . I sincerly wish them all the best . But I cant see it lasting . Maybe you can , so lets have a friendly bet ? Wish it was a real bet , I dont mind winning a few quid . |
|||
|
21 May 2010, 22:26 (Ref:2695709) | #47 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 267
|
The car looks the part, hope they can get to a decent distance in the race.
|
|
|
22 May 2010, 00:44 (Ref:2695754) | #48 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 494
|
Quote:
I was reading about the year when the Binnie Lola won their class at Le Mans. They spent the better part of the last hour sitting in the pits so they could minimize any chance of a crash before the end. I think only two cars were running at the end. Since then, I think we have seen a slow increase in reliability. Moving up to the 800+kg weight limit probably has done as much to improve reliability as anything else. The teams are not forced to cut, cut, cut in regards to weight savings any more. Based on my ramblings, I think there is a BETTER than 50% chance the Norma finishes the 24hrs and is classified.(running and 75% distance) Can we set up a betting pool? lol! dh |
|||
|
22 May 2010, 04:33 (Ref:2695799) | #49 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 30
|
Ah those of little faith not only is the car ready for LeMans but will be officially launched at leMans with the ACO on Tuesday next week. The car has run very well in testing this week at two different tracks in the south of France.
As a reminder the last Norma LMP1 ran in ALMS and leMans in 2003. Two cars were fielded here between 2000 & 2003 in Grand Am & ALMS. Norma has had great success with the M20 CN selling over 150 cars in Europe. The M200 is the latest car & only current chassis to meet 2011 specs for LMP2. hope this clears up some of the speculation |
||
|
22 May 2010, 10:38 (Ref:2695884) | #50 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,896
|
Good looking car.
What material is the body made off? |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stormin' Norma | Osella | Sportscar & GT Racing | 99 | 16 Jun 2011 23:18 |
What exactly makes the Norma so slow? | H16 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 45 | 2 Aug 2010 12:50 |
Possible new LMP2s (CvO, Norma, Radicals, etc...) | Fab | Sportscar & GT Racing | 216 | 12 Jan 2008 11:15 |
Norma LMP2 + Re-built Matra 640 | sportproto | Sportscar & GT Racing | 6 | 5 Mar 2005 22:18 |
norma | Es Nes | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 11 Mar 2002 02:47 |