Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 Jun 2004, 04:02 (Ref:1010318)   #26
Led ZeppF1
Veteran
 
Led ZeppF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Indonesia
Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 1,114
Led ZeppF1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Re: Montoya exclusion. Why after 50+ laps????

I just wonder was why it took so long for the Williams's team to make a decision to get JPM in the spare car. :confused:
Led ZeppF1 is offline  
__________________
Montoya, what just happened?
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 04:15 (Ref:1010322)   #27
avsfan733
Veteran
 
avsfan733's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Rochester
Posts: 1,618
avsfan733 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am willing to bet there was a good bit of confusion as to exactly when JPM left the grid as there was no TV coverage of it until he was actually clear and they probably just wanted to be absolutely sure
avsfan733 is offline  
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 05:23 (Ref:1010333)   #28
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
And i would believe some Williams guys would be busy trying to argue with FIA for JPM to be allowed to race.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 06:39 (Ref:1010360)   #29
Neil Warland
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
Woking, Surrey
Posts: 47
Neil Warland should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Re: Re: Montoya exclusion. Why after 50+ laps????

Quote:
Originally posted by Led ZeppF1
I just wonder was why it took so long for the Williams's team to make a decision to get JPM in the spare car. :confused:
Cars are normally started at about the 30 second board - you can't leave them running stationary for very long. From what Martin Brundle said, the starter drive-shaft broke off when they tried to start JPM's car. Once they realised what had broken, they told JPM to get out of the car and off the grid. But all this had to happen before the 15 second board.
Neil Warland is offline  
__________________
Contains mild peril.
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 06:41 (Ref:1010361)   #30
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
And its a decent rule that people have to follow for safety's sake i suppose...
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 07:03 (Ref:1010365)   #31
Redlake27
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 495
Redlake27 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So many parallels to Canada...

Shame on the officials.........

At Canada they took 24 hours to exclude cars they had under lock and key the night before in parc ferme. In USA they took an hour to read the rules.

Shame on Williams.........

A team that used to have so much integrity. Now, two rule contraventions in 7 days.
Redlake27 is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 07:56 (Ref:1010406)   #32
Neil Adams
Veteran
 
Neil Adams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
United Kingdom
Essex
Posts: 802
Neil Adams should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i think its pathetic!
at the end of the day they're supposed to providing a motorrace to take a perfectly healthy car out of a race of for such a petty error is just daft.

IMO a stalled car on the grid for the start of the green flag lap should be treated the same way as for the race start i.e. waved yellow flags from the pitwall and delay the start of the lap / race then we wouldnt have this problem.

I mean what is the point! they should be awarding williams for getting montoya running before for the start of the race not penalising them.

The rules should help teams to get their cars into the race not the reverse.

grrr!!!
Neil Adams is offline  
__________________
Runner-up in the 2004 & 2005 Motorsport News Photo Competition
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 08:08 (Ref:1010413)   #33
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Honestly, i'm not an expert at all this small details about rules..

But from what i know (do correct me if i'm wrong), the rules is there for safety purpose..the last thing that FIA wants is a car accelerating off line and suddenly hit one guy who decides to run across it.

In any case, it's a rule which has been there before the race. Williams flout it and got the just punishment.

It's unfortunate that FIA took an afternoon to decide the execution, that the efforts of JPM is wasted, but the team ought to have seen it coming anyway.

What i'm equally concerned, as in Canada, is that FIA allowed cars which are effectively "out" to run on the circuit for so long...and potentially could have played a part in affecting the results...

Eg. If Juan ran in the race, fights for 3rd position with Sato, and Sato and Juan collide...Sato out of the race...then comes along the decision to black flag Juan for an infringment at the race-start..it's very unfair to the legitimate runners on the track.

FIA needs to review their system. The penalties isn't the problem, it's the procedure and speed of opertation which is the problem. But maybe stewards are too busy handling the many incidents such as Ralf's accident that Juan's case got delayed.

The rules should be fair, not tuned to increase action as and when FIA pleases...so in that respect, i stand by FIA's decision to award the penalty.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 11:36 (Ref:1010592)   #34
Don K
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
Don K has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally posted by Led ZeppF1
I just wonder was why it took so long for the Williams's team to make a decision to get JPM in the spare car. :confused:
According to one of the dutch reporters, they seemed to have had some trouble in starting the car.

Then when they had the engine running, they couldn't get the starting engine out.

By the time they managed to extract the starting engine, the engine had stopped running.

So I guess after that, they tried to use the second starting engine. They couldn't insert it (maybe because of damage while extracting the first one).


That might explain why they were late.
Don K is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 11:44 (Ref:1010600)   #35
Don K
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
Don K has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally posted by Gt_R
What i'm equally concerned, as in Canada, is that FIA allowed cars which are effectively "out" to run on the circuit for so long...and potentially could have played a part in affecting the results...

Eg. If Juan ran in the race, fights for 3rd position with Sato, and Sato and Juan collide...Sato out of the race...then comes along the decision to black flag Juan for an infringment at the race-start..it's very unfair to the legitimate runners on the track.
If I remember correctly, there has been a case in which a driver was black flagged, the driver used the laps he was allowed to stay on track before coming in, and an accident happened involving that car and a car that did have a chance of winning that race and/or the WDC.

Some time in the 80's, iirc.
Don K is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 12:25 (Ref:1010651)   #36
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I think when the race is up and running, these type of penalties should be included in the 'driver conduct' ones that are applied at the following race, not during the current race. The whole point of these was so that a drivers race would not be affected by a stewards decision until after the race had finished.

Taking so long to decide or inform the team, they should have let JPM continue and then apply any penalty to the next race, which you could argue should be a team penalty anyway - so a fine or WCC points deducted.

To let a driver race for so long and then black flag him is ridiculous. The FIA and stewards need to wake up to what's happening in the real world, some aspects of the USGP already looked badly managed - to disqualify a driver after some 50 laps of racing for an infringement occuring in a 15 seond window, before the race had even started - just added to the incredulity of what we were seeing.
Super Tourer is offline  
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....'
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 13:05 (Ref:1010701)   #37
Redlake27
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 495
Redlake27 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If I remember correctly, there has been a case in which a driver was black flagged, t

I think you are thinking of Portugal in 1989. Mansell was blackflagged, but took Senna out of the race.
Redlake27 is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 13:38 (Ref:1010740)   #38
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
and i believe such things shouldn't be allowed to happen. Hence i am concerned that in Canada, FIA allowed 4 illegal cars to run (potentially risking the legal rivals) and again allowed a car which should have been disqualified right from the start to even complete half the distance of USGP
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 13:59 (Ref:1010766)   #39
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The FIA have looked like a bunch of rank amateurs in teh last few races. Montoya was only 2-3 seconds late to get out of the car, and surely the fact that he was ahvigna great race and providing much of the excitement should come first above somethign so petty.

And before anyone mentions the tragedies in 'similar' cirtcumstances many years ago, the system of having waved yellows next to any stalled car takes care of this. The rule seems very outdated, and surely Montoya's chances suffered enough by him having to go to the back.

Even once we establish that the disqualification was within the (stupid IMHO) rules, the delay in administering it was ridiculous. I can onyl assuem that he was kept in so as to provide some thrills for his many fans in teh US,a dn the Columbians who made the trip and added so much passion, colour and character to the event.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 14:40 (Ref:1010819)   #40
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote: " surely the fact that he was ahvigna great race and providing much of the excitement should come first above somethign so petty."

He shouldn't even be "providing..excitement" in the first place Anyway, Sato seem to do a great job in that respect.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:06 (Ref:1010856)   #41
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Pathetic stewarding. Pick your act up guys! Leaving a guy to race out on the track for 50 laps, after all the chaos that went on, and then black-flag him... JPM would have every right to knock their teeth in. And he'd do it if given the chance.
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:06 (Ref:1010857)   #42
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The black flag was correct.

As for why it didn't come quicker - the first lap crash then Ralf's incident probably took up a lot of the stewards time and attention.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:29 (Ref:1010893)   #43
garcon
Veteran
 
garcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Antarctica
Wilmslow, Cheshire
Posts: 8,885
garcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Does anybody know if there's any truth in Brundle's comments? He was saying he thought there was a time limit of twenty minutes or something from the announcement "the stewards are investigating an incident involving car #n" to the actual decision (in this case the black flag). Martin may have been wrong - he didn't have the rule book in front of him - but he isn't often.

Struck me that it may depend on the severity of the offence/penalty - i.e. a drive through for speeding in the pitlane would have to be issued within twenty minutes, but a black flag for any reason would have no time limit. Purely speculation on my part, though...
:confused:
garcon is offline  
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:29 (Ref:1010894)   #44
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
You honestly believe the incidents took up an hour and a half of the FIA's time?

What about the 20 minute rule that Martin Brundle mentioned? The FIA have 20 minutes to exclude a car, from it's first notification, the exclusion was announced after 26 minutes, surely this was wrong?

Last edited by Mr V; 21 Jun 2004 at 15:30.
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:30 (Ref:1010896)   #45
garcon
Veteran
 
garcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Antarctica
Wilmslow, Cheshire
Posts: 8,885
garcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famegarcon will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Great minds think alike!

(So do ours!)
garcon is offline  
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:37 (Ref:1010907)   #46
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Heh..it seems like the only thing worth contending is whether JPM should be black flagged earlier or later and boy..it's a funny thing to debate for 3 pages..

Okie okie..JPM should have been shown the flag earlier...at least he could go for a shower and a tea instead of driving around.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:41 (Ref:1010915)   #47
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
The Ferrari's might have been able to slow down earlier too
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:44 (Ref:1010917)   #48
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally posted by garcon
Martin may have been wrong - he didn't have the rule book in front of him - but he isn't often.

Judging by the fact that he recited Article 85, i'm sure he did have the rulebook in front of him, that, or he's got a bloody good memory
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 15:53 (Ref:1010930)   #49
Spudgun
Race Official
Veteran
 
Spudgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
England
Reading, UK
Posts: 2,776
Spudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSpudgun should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr V
You honestly believe the incidents took up an hour and a half of the FIA's time?

What about the 20 minute rule that Martin Brundle mentioned? The FIA have 20 minutes to exclude a car, from it's first notification, the exclusion was announced after 26 minutes, surely this was wrong?
We were talking about the 20 minute thing earlier in the thread. After consulting the regs, it was found that the 20 minute rule doesn't appear to be in the 2004 regs.

I thought I was going crazy, but it looks like they were a bit sneaky taking that one out.

Last edited by Spudgun; 21 Jun 2004 at 15:55.
Spudgun is offline  
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach.
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2004, 16:00 (Ref:1010937)   #50
badoer fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 851
badoer fan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm surprised no-one's mentioned this yet... Perhaps the FIA did not notice it at the start, and were only informed of it later in the race by one of the other teams... That could explain why it seemingly took so long.
badoer fan is offline  
Quote
Reply

Tags
jpm


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gt4 Laps nickyf1 Virtual Racers 2 30 Jul 2005 11:26
how many laps????? tramp Kart Racing 5 25 Jun 2004 20:30
European GP - How many laps until Montoya crashes DNQ Formula One 13 13 Jun 2001 04:11
Makinen exclusion threat RichieC65 Rallying & Rallycross 1 24 Jan 2000 13:26


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.