|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
1 Jan 2008, 16:23 (Ref:2097626) | #26 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
1 Jan 2008, 22:51 (Ref:2097766) | #27 | |||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,344
|
Quote:
I jest I jest. I agree 100% |
|||
__________________
"Abe will be remembered as a fighter" - RIP Abe. |
2 Jan 2008, 09:16 (Ref:2097926) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
ChampCar will survive as long as the owners support it, the same as the IRL. Same since 2003.
So I dont see the logic in arguing the IRL as a head and shoulders stronger option at the current time. Last edited by D.R.T.; 2 Jan 2008 at 09:20. |
||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
2 Jan 2008, 14:31 (Ref:2098060) | #29 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
Two words: Indy 500. The Indy 500, however you may wish to devalue it, is an immensely important race, and an immensely profitable race. It has the highest one-day attendance of any race outside NASCAR; its two-week totals are great, and all paid too. In terms of the Hulman family holdings, the Indy 500 more than supports the IRL, and that ignores the Brickyard 400 and now Moto GP. On the other hand, Kevin Kalkoven and Gerry Forsythe (and Dan Pettit?) are funding ChampCar from their personal holdings -- from their wallets, as it were. Big difference. |
|||
__________________
Support Kyle Petty's "Victory Junction" camp |
2 Jan 2008, 17:13 (Ref:2098131) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
If it was so important to drivers and teams and sponsors and fans, tony george wouldn't have to shell out for 15 field fillers. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 00:17 (Ref:2098328) | #31 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Quote:
The point fazzaz is making here, which seems to have been missed, is that this still is the biggest non-NASCAR race and it is also an enormous income-generating event. He did not make any claims to attendance as compared to years past. What is missed is that in comparison to CC, the business end of the IRL is generating enough income to keep the IRL going without anyone having to write a personal check. CC does not have that luxury. The longer personal checks need to be written to keep CC afloat the shorter the anticipated lifespan of the series will be. However one views TG/the IRL, having the 500 as an event generates sponsorship, TV and fan revenues that keeps the wheels turning the rest of the season. How long will whatever number of Amigos there currently are be willing to write checks out of their personal accounts? |
|||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
3 Jan 2008, 04:17 (Ref:2098374) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
The 500 is no longer the money earner it was. As far as we can tell the irl has never turned a profit. That money gets sucked up from somewhere. The fact that the league still couldn't pull it off after toyota, honda and chevy dumped hundreds of millions in and still the series is barely here. Time to give it up. Recall what the irl was started for and what the end result is and I don't think any rational person can justify what has happened over the past 15 years. That the amigos are continually villified for trying to keep the original series alive is absurd. Who started this thing? Jeezz. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 05:00 (Ref:2098379) | #33 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
- is attendance down on race day? - are the seats that much cheaper? - What is the real revenue for the month of May to IMS? Quote:
Quote:
In my opinion, the IRL is nearly a break even proposition, maybe a small loss, maybe a small profit. That isn't the topic here though. We know CART (MPH) was a massive money loser. We assume that revenues have not increased since it became CCWS. We assume that there are basic costs that cannot go away, and that CCWS is nowhere near a break even proposition. There is no real business case for CCWS. However, there is also no hard evidence that CCWS will close down anytime soon either, as it will exist as long as the existing, or future owners wish to spend whatever money is necessary to keep it going. It has become a vanity project/hobby pastime at this point. It will last as long as there is sufficient funding/will to keep it so, but it is past the point of ever being a "business". The IRL folks are all praying for CCWS to cease to exist, or waive the merge white flag, so that their weak side will have some hope for growth. Fans of the Open Wheel we knew in the 80's and 90's want one series, hoping that we can get back a relevant series of some kind. Hardline forum posters on both sides spew rhetoric and hate that devalues their thoughts. This is crazy talk, the my series sucks just slightly less than yours does. |
|||||
|
3 Jan 2008, 07:24 (Ref:2098390) | #34 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
What we say on the IRL side is, on the contrary, that the basic problem of CC is a wrong business idea (i.e. AOW racing without Indy500 at first, then searching for courses worldwide just to attract some local drivers) which leads to bad results regardless the management skills of the amigos, which have proven , in different businesses, absolutely good. |
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
3 Jan 2008, 08:40 (Ref:2098415) | #35 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
3 Jan 2008, 11:09 (Ref:2098508) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
While that is a reasonable thought, D.R.T., there is just not enough fan base/sponsor dollars to support both.
Despite the histrionics vis a vis the 500, imho it is clear that the funding for CC is primarily personal and the funding for the IRL comes out of business revenue. Without major progress, I do not see anyone, no matter how much they love it, funding CC indefinitely from their own pocket. And could we discuss this pretty-please without the whole "well you know who started it" routine. I am tired of having our collective heads up our arse examining our own entrails about who did what to who first. It is ten years on. It is a formula that is broken. It needs to be fixed. I wish anyone who could, would. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
3 Jan 2008, 16:55 (Ref:2098706) | #37 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
- is attendance down on race day? Yup see the bare aluminum
- are the seats that much cheaper? Yup, you can buy them on race day for $10 - What is the real revenue for the month of May to IMS? Not what it used to be. It used to be a month event, now only has one day of interest. Ask any indy business in the tourist trade to compare. "Who is the we, who can't tell if the IRL turned a profit, or a loss? Is there evidence either way, in the public domain? " Yes there is. Indystar archives is were you can start. Have fun I'm not pulling it up for you yet again. "I'm sorry, I see this post as an attempt to derail the thread, to have what is a painful discussion closed, by starting an argument." With the constant bashing of champcar here, it is fair to examine how we ended up here. "In my opinion, the IRL is nearly a break even proposition, maybe a small loss, maybe a small profit. That isn't the topic here though. We know CART (MPH) was a massive money loser. We assume that revenues have not increased since it became CCWS. We assume that there are basic costs that cannot go away, and that CCWS is nowhere near a break even proposition. There is no real business case for CCWS." They don't have the expenses they used to for one thing. "Hardline forum posters on both sides spew rhetoric and hate that devalues their thoughts. This is crazy talk, the my series sucks just slightly less than yours does." When the indy circuit is bulldozed and replaced with a Home Depot and Sonny's BBQ all will be right with the world. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 16:57 (Ref:2098709) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 17:54 (Ref:2098739) | #39 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
There is NOT credible evidence of profits for IMS, the IRL or The Hulman Corp. in the archives of the Indianapolis Star or the Indianapolis Business Journal. It's a private company. No numbers have ever been released.
And whose hand is going to be forced to do what? |
|
|
3 Jan 2008, 19:30 (Ref:2098800) | #40 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 175
|
"When the indy circuit is bulldozed and replaced with a Home Depot and Sonny's BBQ all will be right with the world."
Having read your previous statement I suspect you're serious with that thought. You perhaps should read Fogulhund's post again. Carefully. I was born in Indianapolis, attended my first 500 in 1949, and still have ties to people in the area who have been associated with the Indianapolis Motor Speedway for a very long time. There will always be an Indianapolis Motor Speedway. There will always be an Indianapolis 500. The cars racing in that event will not necessarily always have open wheels. Those who don't understand this strategic possibility or the Hulman family are deluding themselves. Fz. |
||
__________________
Support Kyle Petty's "Victory Junction" camp |
3 Jan 2008, 19:40 (Ref:2098807) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
No numbers, but proof is there. I've posted it several times before and don't see the need to do so again. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 19:48 (Ref:2098813) | #42 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
[QUOTE=fazzazThere will always be an Indianapolis Motor Speedway. There will always be an Indianapolis 500. The cars racing in that event will not necessarily always have open wheels. Those who don't understand this strategic possibility or the Hulman family are deluding themselves.
Fz.[/QUOTE] That's a pretty outstanding statement considering world history and logic. What tangible item has ever lasted forever? Keep in mind at one point in it's life indy had grass growing though the track. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
3 Jan 2008, 19:48 (Ref:2098814) | #43 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
By "someone's hand is going to be forced," I'm assuming that this will refer to either Honda or ABC "forcing" the IRL to merge with that viable juggernaut known as CCWS, or they will pull all of their support?
Only the dwindling bank accounts of the Amigos would "Force their hand" in 2008....after all, they have no manufacturer or network support.... Just a guess But I'll bet I'm pretty warm, aren't I, mountainstar? |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
3 Jan 2008, 22:48 (Ref:2098907) | #44 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
mountainstar, Indy DOES have grass growing through four holes of a redesigned golf course and for the races, spectator mounds of grass on the infield between Turns 2 and 3. The track is now asphalt, but the yard of bricks is still there. It has a new pagoda, bigger and taller than the previous one. It has new garages from the old wooden green-and-white ones.
|
|
|
4 Jan 2008, 02:09 (Ref:2098995) | #45 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Quote:
I have never seen a link to actual numbers, to be honest, but am willing to read any you care to provide a link for. As far as the grass growing, aside from the golf course, there was this little matter called World War II that interrupted activities at the Speedway. Having grown up in a house with a brick front sidewalk, I know only too well how quickly grass will appear - and how long it takes to remove... Since there is no obvious money coming in to CC, I reckon you can say CC is not losing any as it had none to begin with. |
|||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
4 Jan 2008, 03:29 (Ref:2099015) | #46 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
4 Jan 2008, 10:34 (Ref:2099176) | #47 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
Quote:
Please keep serious ms, of course nobody care what will be in 10.000 yrs; we're just considering a realistic time horizon, and unless you join Al Quaeda and make 10 planes drop on IMS, Indy500 is not in jeopardy. Even a disgrace like the ones you wish er... refer to, could provoke nothing more than one year stop, but certainly not the end of Indy500 Quote:
Last edited by climb; 4 Jan 2008 at 10:39. |
|||||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
4 Jan 2008, 10:53 (Ref:2099185) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Of course, at this point the focus of the conversation has been successfully changed with nary a reminder from some of the other folks for us to keep on track lest the mods be alerted...
My only comment in re: the nihilism is that if the 500 is not permanent, CC is less permanent... Hopefully now we can get back to discussing CC's lack of permanence. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
4 Jan 2008, 15:20 (Ref:2099330) | #49 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 11,005
|
I think most people are suitably bored by now, John. The bitterness of what has happened in the past is downright tedious and turns people off. That's why no one outside the die hards cares two tosses about either Champcar or IRL these days. Until people on this board can see the bigger picture then things are not going to be any better. Same with the organisers. If they persist in going in their own directions for their own petty reasons then both series are dead. Period.
|
|
|
4 Jan 2008, 16:10 (Ref:2099353) | #50 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
Agree to an extent, Craig. "Confused" might be a closer term than bored. The casual fan doesn't have ENOUGH interest to keep 'em straight or take a side. Geography is more important. Is one of 'em running near here? Oval or road course are important because the vast majority out there are fans of or lean to one or the other. And if he can't keep 'em straight easily, he goes fishing.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This years Championship with last years points system | brendan24688 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 1 Oct 2004 10:48 |
Who's left? | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 3 | 2 Jun 2001 12:35 |
If anyone is left........ | Lee Purnell | Trackside | 1 | 22 Aug 2000 08:15 |