Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 Aug 2005, 18:19 (Ref:1386534)   #26
Rubinho
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United Kingdom
Cambridge, UK
Posts: 167
Rubinho should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
As well as the smaller manufacturers wanting to move up, how about the larger manufacturers wanting more customer cars? Couldn't LMP2 manufacturers make down speced (lighter and with smaller engines) versions of their cars? They could support them themselves or farm that out to a third party. Since the aero regs would be the same as the existing cars they'd be minimal development work which would mainly go into taking the expensive bits out. Seems unlikely but food for thought...
Rubinho is offline  
__________________
"Ah," said Dirk "it is a rare mind indeed that can render the hitherto non-existent blindingly obvious."
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 18:23 (Ref:1386539)   #27
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubinho
As well as the smaller manufacturers wanting to move up, how about the larger manufacturers wanting more customer cars? Couldn't LMP2 manufacturers make down speced (lighter and with smaller engines) versions of their cars? They could support them themselves or farm that out to a third party. Since the aero regs would be the same as the existing cars they'd be minimal development work which would mainly go into taking the expensive bits out. Seems unlikely but food for thought...

Absolutely....

Lola, Riley, Courage, and others want to sell race cars....

and an LMP3 series like this would introduce prospective drivers and teams to their cars....

I believe that they would jump at the chance to do so...
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 19:42 (Ref:1386597)   #28
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Let's have the rulebook formulated, let's see the manufacturers' response to it, let's have some championships where the cars can run, and then I'll join in the euphoria.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 19:49 (Ref:1386600)   #29
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The Britsports Open Sports racer Series has a very good ruleset...

So does the "V de V" Modern Endurance Series...

Both formulas work very well via weight/displacement-horsepower ratios, and provide great racing action...

and believe it or not, a number of manufacturers would find those rules to be to their liking....

there could be minor variations here and there to either one of those rulesets that would serve as an excellent standard for such a Series....

Thus, you wouldn't have to re-invent the wheel....

I can say this with confidence for two reasons:

1. I've done my homework...like every good boy should, and

2. I ask a lot of questions.....there is no such thing as a stupid question if you don't know the answer....

I'll leave it at that...
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 19:57 (Ref:1386607)   #30
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fine. Let's have a series then, and we'll see how many entrants show up. I will be glad to see the first race, until then - we all have seen too many such plans come to nothing, haven't we.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Northcutt
Thus, you wouldn't have to re-invent the wheel....
No, just build another wheel that turns just as well. As we know it is possible to take an existing, proven concept and f°°° it up beyond recognition.

Again, it would be nice but that doesn't mean it will be. Somebody put a rulebook on the table, and then we'll talk.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 20:04 (Ref:1386610)   #31
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
That day may just come your way, cy....

Maybe sooner, maybe later.....
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 20:14 (Ref:1386615)   #32
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fine! I can't wait!
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 20:18 (Ref:1386620)   #33
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Heres your rulebook.......

Any open/closed protoype that:-

Weighs less than 750KG
Atmo engines 2.5 or under
Turbo engines 1.5 or under

Dozens of chassis are available from bike engined Radicals to Ford V6 powered ProSport 3000's.

Bring them together and let them loose, ala BritCar.

National series require loose regs combined with a race what you bring attitude.

Check out the variety of GT cars we saw in the early years of national GT racing.

Adopting ACO/FIA regs simply descimated fields and increased costs tenfold.

Only when a team/manufactuer is ready to step upto the international scene should they have to adhere to more stringent and costly regs.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 20:37 (Ref:1386633)   #34
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAG
Check out the variety of GT cars we saw in the early years of national GT racing.
And check out what they turned into within a matter of two or three seasons!

Quote:
Only when a team/manufactuer is ready to step upto the international scene should they have to adhere to more stringent and costly regs.
Ah but as we have established, lots of them are!
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2005, 21:30 (Ref:1386665)   #35
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybersdorf
And check out what they turned into within a matter of two or three seasons!
That was on the international scene.

Nationally we lost cars like the Renault Spider GT1, 935s, Marcos, De Tomaso's etc. and where left with a field of 911 GT3s/360s.

There isn't the budget or need to build expensive specials just to compete on the national scene.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 05:50 (Ref:1386782)   #36
Fab
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
Fab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
European Union
Hicksville...
Posts: 9,482
Fab has a real shot at the championship!Fab has a real shot at the championship!Fab has a real shot at the championship!Fab has a real shot at the championship!Fab has a real shot at the championship!Fab has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubinho
I just finished reading an interesting article in Racecar Engineering called Time for LMP3?.
Sam' gonna love this thread

Sorry for that, Rubinho

A special one for our tech nuts, keep on mates !
Fab is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 07:43 (Ref:1386820)   #37
Nordic
Veteran
 
Nordic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
West Sussex
Posts: 2,133
Nordic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Maybe its also time for some tough love, kill off all the struggling series that can't field more than 15 cars. Have a worldwide set of LMP3 rules for national series that maybe lead to a world final with worthwhile prize money.

Below the LMP3, strenghen the Clubmans type series that already florish to try and generate a ladder for both teams and drivers.

The same principle could be used for GT1 & GT2 at international level, GT3 at national

What is certain, to me at least, if LMP3 was introduced into what is already a crowed scene, it will still futher dilute to driver and team gene pool unless space is made for it.

Quote:
There isn't the budget or need to build expensive specials just to compete on the national scene.
If history has taught us nothing else, it is that teams want to win, so in most situations the team with the biggest budget/richest driver will win, if that means building expensive specials, then that is what happens and we lose the cars that can't cut anymore, like the De Tomasa, Marcos etc.
Nordic is offline  
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better.
H S Thompson 1937 - 2005
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 09:25 (Ref:1386849)   #38
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Let me just point out that LMP3 would replace BritSports and VdeV or become the top class within them, whilst still not preventing any car from competing in it. BritSports gets grids of up to 40 cars all which would pretty much fall into the LMP3 rules proposed - same with VdeV. Our Austrian friend has clearly not seen either of these series in action otherwise he would realise that there are probably 25 manufacturers in europe and 10 in the USA that this would work for.
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 11:59 (Ref:1386917)   #39
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss_collins
Let me just point out that LMP3 would replace BritSports and VdeV or become the top class within them, whilst still not preventing any car from competing in it. BritSports gets grids of up to 40 cars all which would pretty much fall into the LMP3 rules proposed - same with VdeV. Our Austrian friend has clearly not seen either of these series in action otherwise he would realise that there are probably 25 manufacturers in europe and 10 in the USA that this would work for.
Your Austrian friend works for one of these series. (to clarify: not for Britsports or VdeV, but for "one of these series he has never seen").
A nice horse you've got there, and so high.
LMP3 rules proposed - which are these?
There are a number of manufacturers the current LMP1/2 regs could work for. Same for the current CN regs. Same for the current GT regulations. All you ever see is the usual suspects, and there will be a reason for that.

Last edited by cybersdorf; 20 Aug 2005 at 12:04. Reason: clarification
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 12:02 (Ref:1386922)   #40
The Badger
Veteran
 
The Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Innsbruck , Austria
Posts: 13,763
The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Northcutt
Why not do it as an ALMS Support Series...
Exactly ..... support series or national series . As a stepping stone to the bigger classes . I certainly dont want to see LMP3 cars racing with LMP1 and LMP2 . Next we will have GT3 as well !!!
The Badger is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 12:03 (Ref:1386923)   #41
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Badger
Exactly ..... support series or national series . As a stepping stone to the bigger classes . I certainly dont want to see LMP3 cars racing with LMP1 and LMP2 . Next we will have GT3 as well !!!
In FIA-GT, we will. Don't forget where the current GT2 cars came from.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 15:43 (Ref:1387025)   #42
Spiteful
Racer
 
Spiteful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Belgium
Posts: 134
Spiteful should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
edit: sorry double post
Spiteful is offline  
__________________
We are the ones that want to choose, always want to play, never want to lose. -
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 15:47 (Ref:1387028)   #43
Spiteful
Racer
 
Spiteful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Belgium
Posts: 134
Spiteful should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm not very well informed about the subject, but it seems to me lmp3 rules should stick close to what we have now in britsports, vdev etc. Certainly not adapted lmp2s. Costs should be kept low. I think the main benefit of this will be unified rules, so that sportscar manufacturers and teams and drivers with proto interests from around the globe can compete in a fair and professional manner. (I don't mean a global championship offcourse, travelling around North America in support of the ALMS would be hard enough for small teams I imagine)
And certainly don't let them run in the same races as the bigger lmps and gts, or worse, replace gt2! Support races should be fine, that might be a support race I actually watch...
I see little problems with the current four class system, although the rules for the gt classes could be better layed out imo.
Spiteful is offline  
__________________
We are the ones that want to choose, always want to play, never want to lose. -
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2005, 17:54 (Ref:1387070)   #44
cybersdorf
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Austria
Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,580
cybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcybersdorf should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiteful
I'm not very well informed about the subject, but it seems to me lmp3 rules should stick close to what we have now in britsports, vdev etc. Certainly not adapted lmp2s.
On the other hand, why not allow the older, "pre-hybrid" LMP675 chassis in? With smaller engines of course. Performance-wise, they would fit in; and these cars exist, with no place to compete at the moment.
cybersdorf is offline  
__________________
Oops
Quote
Old 22 Aug 2005, 16:05 (Ref:1388499)   #45
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
If you fit a smaller engine into a 675 then why not.
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Last Time Peter Mallett Formula One 12 8 Oct 2004 21:53
When was the Last Time??? Lyris Australasian Touring Cars. 11 19 Aug 2003 11:40
What time does first quali start UK time? Sodemo Formula One 6 18 Apr 2003 17:11
How come I have to log in every time Hans.ca Announcements and Feedback 16 23 Mar 2002 19:54


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.