Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 Sep 2003, 09:46 (Ref:723944)   #26
Tristan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location:
In a secret location, unknown even to me
Posts: 2,946
Tristan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"*ban all driver aids....
*ban radio!!!"

So then why not just ban the POWER SUPPLY??? There'd be no arguments as to who's "cheating" or whatever. Rather than ban electronics, BAN ELECTRICITY!!
Tristan is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 10:07 (Ref:723959)   #27
carrera
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
England
Gatwick
Posts: 1,055
carrera should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Remove the mirrors on all cars.
carrera is offline  
__________________
Looking for this season's budget.
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 11:59 (Ref:724098)   #28
Williamp
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Kent
Posts: 111
Williamp should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
At the beginning of the season, give the teams a front wing and a rear wing. With one element...


1 point for fastest lap
1 point for pole

1 pint for the winner (sorry)....

A gearlever, so they have to remove a hand from the wheel.

Allow other manufacturers to supply Chassis for other teams (to increase the grid)
Williamp is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 12:09 (Ref:724107)   #29
Smokey 6 litre
Veteran
 
Smokey 6 litre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
The Total Perspective Vortex
Posts: 1,707
Smokey 6 litre should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
keep the 1 shot quals,,
give the top 6 on Saturday a second chance shoot out,
Point for Friday pole,
Point for Final pole,
Point for fastest lap,
Point for Minardi,
Ban refueling,
ban all driver aids,
Ban radio,
Ban TGF.

Last edited by Smokey 6 litre; 19 Sep 2003 at 12:12.
Smokey 6 litre is offline  
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now"
Douglas Adams. 1952-2001
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 15:31 (Ref:724342)   #30
Redblurr
Veteran
 
Redblurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
United Kingdom
Posts: 1,254
Redblurr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Armco Bender
26 Identical spec cars,so we can actually see who the BEST driver.
I have been thinking about this. But the dilema for F1 is that we have a WDC and Constructors Championship. It would be good to see who the best driver is but we know that already - MS.
Redblurr is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 16:17 (Ref:724378)   #31
Spritle
Veteran
 
Spritle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
46 Egernon Road
Posts: 1,013
Spritle has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Old style qualifying.

Points 12-8-6-5-4-3-2-1

More races!

No launch control.
Spritle is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 16:35 (Ref:724392)   #32
ljakse
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Serbia
Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 1,341
ljakse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridljakse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Tristan
"*ban all driver aids....
*ban radio!!!"

So then why not just ban the POWER SUPPLY??? There'd be no arguments as to who's "cheating" or whatever. Rather than ban electronics, BAN ELECTRICITY!!
Ban driver aids 'coz they're nothing but that - driver aids - I believe there is enough hi-tech stuff in F1 that driving should be left for drivers. (I'm not saying it would have any influence on who's going to be better)


Ban radio 'coz it would (hopefully) cut down strategic driving and increase pure racing - without a radio, driver doesn't know what's going on more than 5 sec ahead or behind him, he doesn't know if 'the other guy' went for pits, or whatever...


And leave electronics to take care of engine&stuff, but nothing more.
ljakse is offline  
__________________
Let it be
Quote
Old 19 Sep 2003, 18:02 (Ref:724498)   #33
Stevespurr
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Lincoln
Posts: 540
Stevespurr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fastest lap over the Friday and Saturday not a specified lap or session then if they had a bad lap they could pull it back in another session.

No restrictions on what they can do to the cars (so long as it is safe) Any tyres that they can get made for them no control on them. No money restrictions if you cant afford it you should not be there.

points system stays with extra for pole and fastest lap.
Stevespurr is offline  
__________________
[FONT]=[Franklin Gothic Medium]STEVE[/FONT]
Quote
Old 20 Sep 2003, 01:11 (Ref:724759)   #34
The Other Chris
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
united states
Posts: 71
The Other Chris should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
point system i think should be
11
8
6
5
4
3
2
1 with a bonus point for pole.
They should make friday as a test day and limit all the teams to 20 days or whatever it is the renault etc. get. single lap quals on sat and sunday and the fastest of the two counts as pole. allow refuelling and i think that it would be an exciting year and as a spectator at the track id see a hell of a lot more.
The Other Chris is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Sep 2003, 17:39 (Ref:725111)   #35
ElScOrChO
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Montreal
Posts: 286
ElScOrChO should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by The Other Chris
point system i think should be
11
8
6
5
4
3
2
1 with a bonus point for pole.
They should make friday as a test day and limit all the teams to 20 days or whatever it is the renault etc. get. single lap quals on sat and sunday and the fastest of the two counts as pole. allow refuelling and i think that it would be an exciting year and as a spectator at the track id see a hell of a lot more.
I like your ideas!
The Other Chris for FIA president!
ElScOrChO is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Sep 2003, 22:31 (Ref:725258)   #36
Liz
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,451
Liz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridLiz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Everyone to drive in 1993 cars. Anyone who was actually in Formula One in 1993 ought to be retired by now anyway, but for those few who remain, make them drive in a different car from the one they drove back then. Assign drivers to teams by drawing numbers out of a hat. All drivers paid only on results.

Definition of "Results" points for top 5 finishers only plus -- 2 points for beating your own personal best; 5 points for beating your teammate in a straight fight. +10 at the end of the season for being the most fan friendly, +15 if you actually step out of the paddock to meet fans not chosen in advance, during the race weekend.

MINUS POINTS: -2 for contact with another car on the first two laps; -5 for chopping across the track on the start; -10 for unsportsmanlike conduct for the first offence -- -20 for 2nd offence; 4 race ban for third; fired for anything after that. Team to lose 25 points for filing frivolous protests, and 50 points for team orders except in the final race of the season.

UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT: Ramming another car and claiming you didn't see him; accusing a driver you hit of trying to kill you; claiming a win when you didn't win, then trying to push the REAL winner onto the top step to make people quit booing you; telling your team over the radio to order a driver from another team who is ahead of you but racing for position to move over because you have more points than he has or have a better looking girl friend; or refusing to talk to fans when ordered to do it. Or anything else the Race Stewards' Moms think well brought up children should not do.
Liz is offline  
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2003, 00:03 (Ref:725286)   #37
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
Bring back slicks (not gonna happen)

Make the fuel tank large enough to last the distance giving teams more options on stratergy or ban re-fuelling full stop.
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2003, 03:24 (Ref:725346)   #38
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Tristan
For me?? A ban on all electrical power sources (batteries, dynamos, solar panels)
You mean diesel engines?
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2003, 04:45 (Ref:725360)   #39
brightline
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
United States
Temple Terrace, FL
Posts: 390
brightline should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
no launch control or traction control!
Slicks!
limit number of mechanics who can service the car during a pit stop...really how many mechanics does it take to change a tire.
Allow drivers to choose their numbers, who else misses things like number zero on a car?
brightline is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2003, 09:13 (Ref:725439)   #40
DriverT
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United Kingdom
Silverstone
Posts: 2,147
DriverT should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Liz
MINUS POINTS: -2 for contact with another car on the first two laps; -5 for chopping across the track on the start; -10 for unsportsmanlike conduct for the first offence -- -20 for 2nd offence; 4 race ban for third; fired for anything after that. Team to lose 25 points for filing frivolous protests, and 50 points for team orders except in the final race of the season.

UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT: Ramming another car and claiming you didn't see him; accusing a driver you hit of trying to kill you; claiming a win when you didn't win, then trying to push the REAL winner onto the top step to make people quit booing you; telling your team over the radio to order a driver from another team who is ahead of you but racing for position to move over because you have more points than he has or have a better looking girl friend; or refusing to talk to fans when ordered to do it. Or anything else the Race Stewards' Moms think well brought up children should not do.
Is this a reference to anyone in particular, Liz?
DriverT is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2003, 09:32 (Ref:725453)   #41
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Um,lets see...
Shoot bernie
Send max to work at the safety department of skoda
Get a bunch of brains together and ask what will allow the cars to run close without affecting each others aero so much,and DO IT.
Ban lateral grooves(in fact make max wear suits with lateral groove patterns for the rest of his life,LOL)
Bring back slicks OR use a 'maximum tread area' formula so they can make the tread any shape they like
Put sensible prices on the racetrack enty and have a draw if nessesary to cut down on the non race fan type people at events(yes those rich w**kers)
Bring back some form of the old type of qualifying agian.(as much as i like the idea of single lap-it's not good for the fans at the track)
Make it a rule that any tyre company MUST BE PREPARED TO SUPPLY ALL TEAMS THAT WANT THEIR TYRES THAT WEEKEND.Most teams would stick to the brands that they are used to but small teams that can't test anyway would be better off.
Teams can buy old cars from another team.They don't HAVE to make their own as now is the case.
And the biggest change of all---All drivers are pre approved by the constructors and will rotate between teams thoughout the year so that every driver drives for every team.Any time someone is injured there will be a bunch of 'teams approved' standby drivers ready to fill in.
This way drivers really do have a FAIR drivers championship!
and constructors really do have a fair championship!
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 09:40 (Ref:726165)   #42
Korr
Racer
 
Korr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Alaska, USA
Posts: 288
Korr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
1) Ban launch control.

2) Smaller rear wing and slicks!

3) 12 second mandatory length pit stop.

4) Ban automatic up and down shifting of transmissions.
Korr is offline  
__________________
"I'm not speeding, I'm qualifying"
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 11:47 (Ref:726290)   #43
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally posted by Korr


3) 12 second mandatory length pit stop.

Not sure what this would acheive Korr as all driver pit stops would be the same length and wouldn't allow for different stratergys.

At the CART race at Brands this year, all teams/drivers had to make 2 fuel pit stops that weren't under yellow conditions, so all cars stopped roughly the same time in the race. Turned, what should have been an exciting race at an exciting venue into one of the most boring CART races seen for a long time.
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 12:37 (Ref:726343)   #44
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 44,191
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
I guess having a madatory pit stop length would remove an aspect which is outside the drivers control. The strategy would remain, but the teams would build in a 12s stop rather than a x second stop to there calculations.

I'm not really bothered one way or the other, but it is certainly an idea.
Adam43 is offline  
__________________
Brum brum
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 12:42 (Ref:726355)   #45
Mr V
Veteran
 
Mr V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
The city of bridges (one day!)
Posts: 13,211
Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!Mr V has a real shot at the championship!
A 3 stopper takes approx 6-7 seconds, a 2 stopper 10ish seconds and a 1 stopper (have we seen any of them this year?) 13+ seconds, so going on a 3 stopper but having to stay in the pits for 12 seconds wouldn't gain anything when a 2 stopper stops for the same ammount of time but fills up with more fuel.
Mr V is offline  
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 12:49 (Ref:726371)   #46
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 44,191
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Yes, but it is more complicated than that. It isn't just the shorter stops that is a factor. In fact I think this is the least important aspect of deciding strategy. In rough order of importance things to consider are
1) Weight saved and quicker lapping.
2) Time lost entering and leaving pit lane.
3) Time staitionary.

There would be a difference, but you would only have to build in an extra few seconds for each stop. It does mean that any strategies that were marginal might be pushed more towards a strategy with less stops.
Adam43 is offline  
__________________
Brum brum
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 15:10 (Ref:726542)   #47
Tristan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location:
In a secret location, unknown even to me
Posts: 2,946
Tristan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Seriously, the only two things I'd change would be:

1) Slick tyres made legal with current dimensions intact.

2) Ban all power sources on the cars (as I explained previously).

The advantage of the second one would mean manual gear boxes, no TC, no LC and, best of all, ZERO AMBIGUITY.

It's the way forward, people!! Accept it!!
Tristan is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 16:39 (Ref:726637)   #48
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Allow differnt amount of cylinders and not just v10s. Have it like 60s/70s/90s where you could run things like v8,v112,v10 etc.
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 16:42 (Ref:726643)   #49
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 44,191
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally posted by Edmonton
Allow differnt amount of cylinders and not just v10s. Have it like 60s/70s/90s where you could run things like v8,v112,v10 etc.
Yes, I agree with this. Variety. Nice!
Quote:
Originally posted by Edmonton
v112
Not even BRM would be that crazy!
Adam43 is offline  
__________________
Brum brum
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2003, 16:54 (Ref:726662)   #50
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by AdamAshmore
Yes, I agree with this. Variety. Nice!

Not even BRM would be that crazy!
Opps -a little typo i ment v12 But I could see a v16maybe or a v6,hell if they want they could a 4 as well.
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gran Turismo 5 - Wishlist peteconnors Virtual Racers 70 20 Feb 2006 21:47
2005 BTCC Wishlist: Drivers BootsOntheSide Touring Car Racing 26 9 Dec 2004 11:34
Your F1 wishlist? Lee Janotta Formula One 30 9 Sep 2002 04:12
The New Rules macdaddy ChampCar World Series 13 14 Mar 2002 10:03


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.