|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Mar 2022, 23:37 (Ref:4103208) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,214
|
Quote:
I was thinking possibly a powertrain test for the new Vette hybrid system but Caddy plus spec hybrid option as well |
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 12:34 (Ref:4103251) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,483
|
Maybe, instead of G56 being all about new tech, it could just be run what you brung.
2023: NASCAR 2024: Moto GP 2025: F2 2026: Guy Martin on a bicycle, slipstreaming a truck |
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 13:02 (Ref:4103254) | #28 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 15:35 (Ref:4103277) | #29 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,071
|
A full spec Super GT at their fastest would have been amazing too.
|
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
19 Mar 2022, 15:37 (Ref:4103278) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,483
|
Or that...
|
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 16:30 (Ref:4103285) | #31 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 22:03 (Ref:4103341) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,983
|
I seem to remember Sam Collins on a Midweek Motorsport (or other bit of coverage) opining that a JGTC car at its prime showing up at Le Mans or anywhere else against LMS / ALMS opposition would absolutely clean their clocks. If we could have that counterfactual I'd totally book tickets to see it.
Last edited by isynge; 19 Mar 2022 at 22:04. Reason: annoying typo |
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 22:35 (Ref:4103351) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,566
|
Quote:
The only real point of comparison are Fuji lap times when both series ran there in clear conditions. At their fastest, GT500 would have run the factory hybrids close. At Le Mans, I have my doubts that this would be directly replicated - GT500 run draggier than prototypes, even before taking low-downforce bodywork into contention. If it were to happen with LMH/LMDh, I reckon GT500 would do the business, even taking into account a relative lack of top speed. |
|||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
19 Mar 2022, 23:09 (Ref:4103355) | #34 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,983
|
|||
|
19 Mar 2022, 23:33 (Ref:4103361) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
Not to consider that 007 and GR010 at LM are in the range of >320-330km/h, which isn't a crazy top speed afterall. In my opinion if a GT500 would run at LM, it would lack of some top speed of course, but it would qualify under 3.20 without even pushing that hard.... in fast corners like porsche or tetre rouge would look like f1 compared to LMH, despite having almost the same weight. |
||
|
19 Mar 2022, 23:56 (Ref:4103369) | #36 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,566
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
20 Mar 2022, 21:39 (Ref:4103577) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,713
|
What if a Super GT500 had the same fuel flow limiter as the Le Mans Hypercars?
|
||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
20 Mar 2022, 22:30 (Ref:4103598) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
LMH don't use fuel flow anymore, power/torque curve is mandated by bop and max power is in the range of 670-700hp. Unlike GT500, fuel efficiency and in general fuel consume isn't a problem anymore since max stint is given by a max amount of allocated energy a stint measured through torquemeters placed on shaft/shafts... as consequence of this absolute value taken as reference, it doesn't matter how much fuel a car consumes as long it stays in that limit (infact toyota and glickenhaus have similiar stint length but toyota manages to do that with 20lt smaller fuel tank). Actual GT500 cars should be in the range of 90kg/h, something more something less according to regulations or to success handicap system, years ago when they were close to 100kg/h they had power close or above 650hp... it's impossible to say current power output but I think that despite a decreased fuel flow rate, toyota and honda NRE engines are still in that range of power since they constantly upgraded their pre-chamber ignition technology across the years. |
||
|
4 Apr 2022, 20:38 (Ref:4105336) | #39 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,634
|
I can't find the source at the moment, but some in Nascar aren't happy that Hendrick gets to run this project as they think it amounts to additional testing. They were also mad they had to find out about this via press release.
|
||
|
4 Apr 2022, 21:33 (Ref:4105341) | #40 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,205
|
In getting to grips with the hybrid system I can see that. It will also be beneficial overall for the series for testing that, but just getting used to it could be a help to Hendrick.
The only possible solution is to open it up to a proper class and allow them all to run. Too many Orecas and Ferraris? This is your solution. Too many stock cars. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
19 May 2022, 00:52 (Ref:4110518) | #41 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,634
|
Quite candid story about the displeasure of Toyota and Ford in NASCAR working privately with GM on the G56 entry.
https://www.motorsport.com/nascar-cu...olet/10306058/ |
||
|
19 May 2022, 02:13 (Ref:4110522) | #42 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,205
|
Ha, I bet it caused some, er, surprise. Nice that Toyota were actually at Sebring when it was announced. Did seem to come from nowhere for them.
I vaguely remember an interview on RLM not long after the announcement and being transparent and all learning from it came up. There is only one possible solution though. Make it a class and have at least three cars, one of each. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
19 May 2022, 08:55 (Ref:4110546) | #43 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,483
|
|||
|
19 May 2022, 11:09 (Ref:4110553) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,054
|
|||
|
19 May 2022, 14:08 (Ref:4110572) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 667
|
I think the selection committee has enough of a problem without adding 3 auto entries for NASCAR!
|
||
|
19 May 2022, 15:04 (Ref:4110582) | #46 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,483
|
|||
|
19 May 2022, 15:10 (Ref:4110583) | #47 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
or... being G56 an invisible class, just give a 5 hours turn to each of them...
chevrolet -> 16-21 ford -> 6-11 toyota -> 11-16 everyone gets same visibility + no moving chicane or rocket on straight during more risky and dangerous night hours. |
|
|
19 May 2022, 18:56 (Ref:4110608) | #48 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,906
|
Let them do a 500 mile race at Le Mans, winning manufacturer gets the entry.
|
|
|
13 Jun 2022, 00:38 (Ref:4115275) | #49 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,157
|
During the RLM coverage of the race, Hindy interviewed Roy Carroll, who owns and sponsored the Riley entered GTEPro Ferrari 488, that ended up 5th in class. They spoke about the race, but also about the Hendrick Camaro entry for G56 next year. Carroll is good friends with Hendrick. Richard Childress is doing the engines for the Camaro entry, a friend of Hendricks and Carroll. Also, obviously interested in the money that will flow into this project, ss he owns a Nascar team.
Hendricks was at LeMans for the race. Jimmy Johnson was mentioned in the RLM interview, but by Hindy in a sort of 'wouldn't it be great' comment, and Carroll agreed. Carroll is a Ferrari collector-he doesn't know how many he has (!)-abd races Ferrari Challenge in US. Also, obviously, lots of funds. https://greensboro.com/sports/greens...7675e609e.html Last edited by skycafe; 13 Jun 2022 at 00:41. Reason: Typo |
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
13 Jun 2022, 15:34 (Ref:4115398) | #50 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,634
|
Quote:
On the nascar front, i did hear that Jeff Gordon was also in attendance at Le Mans. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ACO on safety changes at La Sarthe (merged) | valedave | 24 Heures du Mans | 38 | 30 Nov 2013 22:12 |
The class to watch this year at La Sarthe? | Aerodynamic | Sportscar & GT Racing | 16 | 4 Mar 2007 22:57 |
Best way to get to La Sarthe on Friday 16th? | Osella | Sportscar & GT Racing | 18 | 24 May 2006 13:33 |
la sarthe and the nordschleife | heldring | Sportscar & GT Racing | 28 | 6 Apr 2004 12:07 |
la sarthe | kdr | Sportscar & GT Racing | 8 | 1 Jul 2002 08:30 |