|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Dec 2005, 09:09 (Ref:1487855) | #26 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
It does not make a new tyre any softer. Dave |
|||
|
21 Dec 2005, 10:09 (Ref:1487894) | #27 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 860
|
I do have it on very, very good authority that there WILL be random fuel test's next year.
A not so little bird told me. |
|
|
21 Dec 2005, 10:34 (Ref:1487924) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Ruling the waves!
If you want to be pedantic most cars would fail scrutineering IF there were proper Scrutineering Bays at all hillclimbs.
The sight of a scrutineer at Doune with a block of metal on the end of a stick so he could check ground clearances was turned into a Marx Brothers farce when you looked at the part of the paddock where he was attempting to do the check. I also noticed that the checks were not done on all cars running slicks. So we have a double dilemma. Rules that are contradictory and impossible to enforce. On the subject of which cars were illegal at Doune - possibly any car that competed without a mirror of at least 50 sq cm that would give a clear view of the rear? |
||
|
21 Dec 2005, 13:58 (Ref:1488076) | #29 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
Quote:
Dave, thanks for that. Potentially, then, chemicals can make tyres useable for longer if I've understood it correctly? For speed eventing I'd have thought that would be beneficial to most copetitors. Which makes me wonder (not being technical in these things). What does cover general regs for hills/sprints? Part of the interest to me is the weird and wonderful variety of vehicles which are competitive. Clearly there's all sorts of local/championship/class regs. Does the blue book over-ride these where there's a conflict or not, because clearly a lot of the MSA regs about racing are really unnecessary for speed events as Steve's post beautifully highlights. As long as it's not a safety issue, or stupid expenditure, then does it matter? It's a branch of sport where people will spend what they want in order to go faster whether it means they'll win or not, and you can't buy the extra bravery or talent you need to be ultimately competitive. So the checks - ride height is good - I've seen the results of high speed suspension failure possibly due to excessively low ride heights. You wouldn't want to risk it, so enforce it. Minimum weight - because a lighter car is potentially a weaker car (see Steve Owen for how to build a chassis that seems able to withstand almost anything - good work, Steve.) Fuel, because rocket propellant is hugely expensive and can make a difference. So test it and make sure it came from a commercial pump. Perhaps organisers provide it at cost so that everyone's using the same? Don't know how practical it is. Silencers. Because we don't want to annoy the neighbours. Unfortunately! (Ooh, that Ferarri sports car...) I presume certain dimensions are prescribed? Wings, etc.? Anything else worth bothering about, or would you go for a free-for-all beyond the above in keeping with the old Shelsley Special idea. After all, what rules could you write that would allow someone like Nic Mann to build such amazing beasts? And you really wouldn't want to outlaw that kind of inventiveness. |
|||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
21 Dec 2005, 14:27 (Ref:1488095) | #30 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Quote:
Ride Heights: these must be checked on a calibrated level surface. To enforce this a calibrated level surface would have to be available at every venue preferably not just championship ones. Also it would be vital to check ALL competitors in each of the classes where a minimum ride height rule applied. Minimum Weights: these must be checked on calibrated scales, this could be done using calibrated transportable units that could be set up in a Scrutineering Bay (more expense for the organisers/venue owners). Fuel: this would have to be checked in some sort of portable laboratory. This would require as well as noise scruutineers a pair of fuel scrutineers. Alternatively you could take fuel samples from each car as they complete their final run of the day so that they can be checked thoroughly at a later date. All of this takes money which in Speed Events is in short supply. |
|||
|
21 Dec 2005, 16:01 (Ref:1488148) | #31 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 173
|
Quote:
Ride heights don't seem to be that much of a problem as nobody wants to take there expensive floor off and be faced with expensive bills to repair replace. eg Barbon last year Minimum weights, This isn't a control formula, so having a minimum weight limit doesn't achieve anything, Would you outlaw the PCD which weighed 208kgs iirc. We all try and build our cars to be as light as possible ,but not at the expense of safety (i hope anyway ) Fuel : commercial pump fuel doesn't have the consistency of octane rating to be viable to use with the full race engines, why risk a 50k engine for a bad batch of fuel. I'm not advocating the use of nitro, just that commercially available race fuel is available for use with highly strung engines and is a consistent formula. Noise limits and wing sizes are all covered by the rules/regs so we are all covered there by the same standards Without the freedom of regulations to build your dream we wouldn't have the likes of the GWR predator. Dave |
|||
|
21 Dec 2005, 17:24 (Ref:1488194) | #32 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
Full marks to Renault for their end-of-a-V10-era sound run after the last GP. Regards Jim Last edited by JimW; 21 Dec 2005 at 17:25. Reason: To get quote right. |
|||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
21 Dec 2005, 19:00 (Ref:1488240) | #33 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
Secretly I agree with you, Jim, but I fear we'd have nowhere left to play. Both the BRM and Keith Harris's Chevron were highlights at the Shelsley centenary but I believe some of the residents of Worcester were disturbed from their lawn mowing.
|
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
21 Dec 2005, 23:21 (Ref:1488422) | #34 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 214
|
Silenced V10
|
||
|
21 Dec 2005, 23:23 (Ref:1488425) | #35 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 214
|
100th
It's my hundreth.
.............comments invited ... Richard |
||
|
21 Dec 2005, 23:26 (Ref:1488427) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
Thats whats been on my mind as well Dave... In the start hillclimbing,as with any branch of motorsport I guess,was one guy pitting what he had built against what another guy had built.... Simple as that.... Now obviously there needs to be some common ground with regards to what can and cant be done but to me it seems that the rules and regs may be starting to get a little bit OTT.... Lets try and take a step back and try and get back closer to what motor sport was when it was first born... As Dave rightly says..... If rules and regs were too stringent then we wouldnt have things like The Predator.....Nick Manns 4 wheel drive helicopter etc etc..... |
||
__________________
If your not confused......You dont know whats going on... Diesel..........The fuel of the future |
22 Dec 2005, 11:41 (Ref:1488627) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Formula Libre?
So are you advocating a free formula for hillclimb and sprinting?
With for example: 1) No ride height restrictions 2) No minimum weight 3) No restrictions on rear wing widths and heights 4) Fuel open to any type 5) Tyre softener allowed However the MSA would have to ensure that the devices being run were safe and fit for purpose. Therefore there would have to be regs about: 1) Roll Bars/Cages 2) Noise Limits (now a health and safety issue) 3) Materials used in construction 4) Safety regulations with respect to fuel cells 5) Racewear 6) Brakes 7) Electrical 8) Timing Strut 9) Fire Extinguishers 10) Engine Equivalencies 11) Category Specific Regs etc. |
||
|
22 Dec 2005, 13:41 (Ref:1488700) | #38 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
Sounds fairly reasonable. I do wish racewear included gloves. Apart from banging your hands against things, the times I've seen an uncovered hand come out to try to stop a car rolling over. Do yourselves a favour and cover it. Even thin material helps.
|
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
22 Dec 2005, 13:50 (Ref:1488708) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
Sounds good to me... As I said there would need to be SOME rules and regs but let the inventor invent and show the world,or at least the Worcestershire countryside,what he/she can do... |
||
__________________
If your not confused......You dont know whats going on... Diesel..........The fuel of the future |
22 Dec 2005, 15:37 (Ref:1488771) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Way forward
Right then all it needs is someone (NOT ME!) to put together a proposal for the Speed Events committee. It would probably have to have the backing of ...
A) the drivers B) the constructors (Gould/Pilbeam/Force/OMS) C) the Championship Co-ordinators for the British Hillclimb and the British Sprint Championships So relatively easy then! |
||
|
22 Dec 2005, 19:53 (Ref:1488882) | #41 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8
|
Seems to me Steve that he current regs are about as loose as you are ever likely to get in terms of freedom of expression for inventors/extrovert engineers. I suggest we leave well alone as any suggestion is likely to spurr the powers that be into having a closer look and clamping down on f1 up the Garden path or flat garden path driving.
May the moose be with you. |
|
|
22 Dec 2005, 22:47 (Ref:1488986) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
Is anything worth having if its so easy to get? Its all pie in the sky anyway as nothing that is ever said on here is likely to be acted upon/implemented.... Its nice to dream though... |
||
__________________
If your not confused......You dont know whats going on... Diesel..........The fuel of the future |
22 Dec 2005, 23:50 (Ref:1489022) | #43 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
TBH, sounds pretty much what we've already got. Sensible rules, sensibly applied. A benevolent dictator who runs things because he loves it. Lots of like-minded competitors and officials who understand that a great meeting is only as good as the party on Saturday night.
I knew there was a reason I loved it other than just fast cars. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
23 Dec 2005, 07:55 (Ref:1489116) | #44 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
|
Having gone from running hillclimb and sprint cars to now running circuit cars i have seen how easy the speed events people have it regards to rules and regulations and the ability to stick to them.
Every event we have done this year the top3 from the race and a few random cars are picked up by the championship scrutineer and are checked for a regulation of some sort. We have even had to strip the top end of the engine after the first day on a 2 day meeting, this meant that we were late to the pub, but also a paddock is not the best place to keep race engines clean while rebuilding them, but it means the level playing field. Now i am not moaning about this though as it means that eveyone knows that if they cheat they will be caught, and as such keeps things good and competative with no back biteing (well not much anyway). The scrutineer is a fair chap and as long as it is not blatent cheating he just says get it fixed for the next race i.e floor bolt broken thus under the ride height. I do miss the friendlyness of speed events though as it is possible to go a whole weekend without speaking to any other teams and that is the way to try to keep speed events, fast inventive and fun, with the competative element thrown in. Cheers Rich Whitefoot |
||
|
23 Dec 2005, 09:21 (Ref:1489146) | #45 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 860
|
In response to Woolley,You don't even have to wear shoes!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As Midland Rescue found out when attending a "shout" at Prescott the driver was helped out of his car and only had sock's on!!!!! Last edited by rescue dude; 23 Dec 2005 at 09:24. Reason: cock-up on the communication front. |
|
|
23 Dec 2005, 11:59 (Ref:1489203) | #46 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Quote:
Yes but......were they flame retardent socks? If so it was probably better than the guy at a VSCC meeting I saw hop out of his car with patern socks and tennis shoes! It's all relative, and it's usually a relative who is taking the PI55! |
|||
|
24 Dec 2005, 11:59 (Ref:1489614) | #47 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 860
|
No they weren't.
Lovely man made fibre. |
|
|
24 Dec 2005, 12:44 (Ref:1489637) | #48 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
27 Dec 2005, 01:53 (Ref:1490365) | #49 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,750
|
Anyhoo, to get back to the point. One aspect I have not yet seen mentioned is... It might not be the effect on competition that caused these agents to be banned. There might be several other reasons like (for instance) 1. They might have an adverse reaction on the track surface. 2. They might cause the tyre to wear and fail at an unpredictably fast rate. Even with my limited grasp of Chemistry, I can deduce that by definition a tyre softener would change the compound of the tyre. And it would be near impossible to apply evenly. Wouldn't that cause weak points in the tyre? The tyre people spend and awful lot of time reshearching the compound and contruction of the tyre to make it as safe as possible. Doesn't changing it seem like a very silly and dangerous thing to do? 3. A tyre softener is likely to involve a powerful solvent which is difficult to store or apply safely. One of those is bad enough, I all three are possible, the ban has some significant benefit IMO |
||
__________________
I want a hat with "I only wanted one comb" written on it. |
3 Jan 2006, 11:15 (Ref:1494037) | #50 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
|
Happy New Year
|
||
|
Tags |
blue book |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2006 msa blue book | soper | Racers Forum | 60 | 3 Mar 2007 19:25 |
Marshals and the Blue book | ss_collins | Marshals Forum | 72 | 8 Jan 2006 00:17 |
Blue Book changes for 2004 | JimW | Marshals Forum | 26 | 5 Feb 2004 12:45 |
Blue Book for 2004 | Richard Sneader | Marshals Forum | 44 | 12 Jan 2004 13:38 |