|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Jun 2011, 15:01 (Ref:2895168) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
V10s will pretty much be extinct at Le Mans next year. That's a different story though. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:05 (Ref:2895172) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:06 (Ref:2895174) | #28 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Nonetheless, it is a class according to the rules and it is a fairly popular category. Well, at least in Europe it is. There's a good chance that a full-time LMS LMP2 team who has been loyal to ACO racing that could win the class will be left on the sidelines so the Sausagemobile can run unclassified demo laps.
|
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:17 (Ref:2895181) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
Of course, ideally something like the 918 RSR or even the Porsche GT3 hybrid that ran at Petit last year would be the 56th entry. That would combine technology, performance, endurance, and sensual appeal. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:19 (Ref:2895184) | #30 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 50
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:50 (Ref:2895196) | #31 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Significant developments in motorsport have often been greeted with huge sceptism, mid-engine location, wings, turbocharging, carbon chassis, diesels, hybrids..............
Rather than getting hung up on the Delta Wings strange shape, the real story is the concept behind it, less weight, less power, same performance, better economy. Imagine an R18 weighing 200-300kg less, with a 300-400bhp IC engine, supplemented by a 200bhp hybrid system, and downforce generated soley by sophisticated ground effects. |
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:51 (Ref:2895197) | #32 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
As much as I like the old rumbling V8's and whining V12's, thundering your eardrums down your bum while passing by, I understand that there is a need for changes. But do not make it a laughable showcase for nutters. Is this the end already with the Fia barely invited to LM by the ACO, are times that bad to come with a landspeed car to LM. As much as I would like to see a demo of an audi/peugeot battling a F1 car for a lap. This isn't the right way of stimulating electrical cars which aren't into a current class at all.. What is the problem of electrical cars on the road and petrol engines @ LM?... I would turn in my petrol fuel for that if it had to be that way... As much as I dislike the whole hybrid/electrical car idea (where does that energy come from? from the sky?.. or just from a powerplant (what a eco friendly alternative to fosilfuel cars!...) |
|||
__________________
Supporting Aston Martin and Corvette in the GT2 (sorry GT1 :( ) |
10 Jun 2011, 15:52 (Ref:2895199) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Stallone already wants to do a movie about these things ..... sponsorship is lined up with Red Bull (gives you wings) , and Harrison Ford and Lee Majors ..... get to do the honors against the mad hatter brewing potions in his soup kitchen .
Utter ****in rubbish !!! |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:55 (Ref:2895202) | #34 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Supporting Aston Martin and Corvette in the GT2 (sorry GT1 :( ) |
10 Jun 2011, 15:57 (Ref:2895203) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 690
|
Quote:
Side cars single front tire doesnt have a large contact patch and it corners well. It weighs 880 lbs compared to a 908 or R18 weighing 2000 lbs so that will help it corner. I think it running LMP2 lap times is not out of the question And if they give it a 60 liter tank it could go 16+ laps at the estimated 12mpg! Last edited by Holt; 10 Jun 2011 at 16:05. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 16:07 (Ref:2895209) | #36 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
Quote:
My feeling is that the ACO wanted to fulfill their 56th garage plans in 2012 and the Sausagemobile was the closest and most surefire plan they had to actually meet deadlines. Plus, they probably like having the name Gurney involved in the race again. Whether it fit into their initial vision for the 56th garage idea or not became irrelevant. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2011, 16:14 (Ref:2895212) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
The 56th grid slot is for unique concepts, like the BRM turbine and Chapparell fan car, some may work, some maybe adapted, some will be dead ends. Modern motorsport is extremely conservative, whether the Delta Wings works or not, it's going to be interesting viewing, both for enthusiasts and the wider public. Within a few years hybrid systems will be standard in both LMP and GT, the 56th grid slot will be around for decades. Last edited by JAG; 10 Jun 2011 at 16:35. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 18:00 (Ref:2895283) | #38 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,860
|
I'm not going to hold my breath as to the re-emergance of the D-Wing after the ICONIC committe rejected it but if it races at Le Mans it should certainly be interesting.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
10 Jun 2011, 18:59 (Ref:2895319) | #39 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,909
|
Quote:
On topic: If this is the future of sports car racing, no thank you. I'll take my money elsewhere. As for simulation videos, how much can I pay someone to make my Jeep do a 3:22 lap at la sarthe? As for weight, why do we need the genital shape for that weight? I find it hard to believe that manufacturers wouldn't be able to design p1 cars several hundred pounds lighter than they are now if it meant a smaller car overall. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2011, 19:31 (Ref:2895331) | #40 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Apparently it hasn't been that long since we've had LMP675... so we should without a great deal of difficultly get cars down some 225 kg lighter than they are now. I think the biggest challenge is the weight of the diesel engines, and we know that the ACO couldn't put them at a disadvantage. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2011, 20:22 (Ref:2895362) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 20:35 (Ref:2895365) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 21:04 (Ref:2895374) | #43 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Jun 2011, 21:10 (Ref:2895376) | #44 | ||
Team Crouton
1% Club
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 40,008
|
Just a reminder that there is a dedicated '56th Garage' thread in the sub-forum. Unless we keep discussion in here to the Delta Wing thing, I'll have to think about merging/moving for the second time today.......
|
||
__________________
280 days...... |
10 Jun 2011, 21:14 (Ref:2895380) | #45 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,630
|
Quote:
as far as the "delta schwing" goes, if a team wanted to make a light weight car with crazy proportions I dont' have a problem with it, but I wouldn't expect other teams to follow. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2011, 21:24 (Ref:2895385) | #46 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,016
|
What a joke.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 22:11 (Ref:2895398) | #47 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
My concern is the wieght and power vs. Safety cell of thedriver.how long would devlopment of this go on before that engine can make crahorsepower and speeds
I doubt safety will keep up as fast. That the problem for me. The small engine meansnothing as power gains can be massive. I expect tire failure before any handling issue. |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
11 Jun 2011, 00:06 (Ref:2895448) | #48 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
A WRC engine and restrictor would give it around 325bhp, the aim is low drag and fuel efficiency.
As for the safety cell, it's a two seater, and renders show it's quite hefty, certainly larger than single seaters. Some of the reaction to the DW is strange, spec racing and standardisation is so common place, anything out of the norm polarises views. There's nowhere to hide for DW, it'll either work or not, if the latter they may adapt their design to a more traditional LMP form, yet still see some of the benefits. Greater reg freedom in years gone by encouraged innovation, and some of the greatest developments the sport ever saw. P1 manufactuers are already at the cutting edge of design and powertrains, to qualify for the 56th grid slot a car is going to have to buck many conventions, if not why even bother. |
|
|
11 Jun 2011, 00:39 (Ref:2895452) | #49 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jun 2011, 10:13 (Ref:2895530) | #50 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 170
|
Wow. I've never seen such a bunch of whiners in my life.
|
||
__________________
"Dude, Scott Sharp wrecked again." Uttered by my buddy at various races the past couple years. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wide Front Wing / Narrow rear wing | browney | Formula One | 30 | 21 Nov 2011 12:13 |
Delta S4's that were in Rallycross | M.Lowe | Rallying & Rallycross | 23 | 30 Aug 2007 11:47 |
Delta wing , inverted delta wing | effuno | Racing Technology | 3 | 8 Apr 2007 13:45 |