Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 May 2004, 03:43 (Ref:980715)   #26
Nivola
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location:
Perth Western Australia
Posts: 445
Nivola should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So this means that sports sedans become the ultimate roofed racing in Australia again!

I see a lot of danger in these rules. We might aswell get toyota to build the Motors now! This class has just become a one make formula.

Will they become slower then the GT3's in Carrera Cup?
This shall become very interesting!
Nivola is offline  
__________________
remember the past embrace the future
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 08:00 (Ref:980868)   #27
D.R.T.
Veteran
 
D.R.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Sydeny
Posts: 8,963
D.R.T. should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridD.R.T. should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by B!tchie Renault
As I said before, the way it is heading is for Paul Pickett to build 32 cars, skin 16 each as Holden and Fords and them place them with the teams to race.

Imagine that, a control race team.
Is this what Project Blueprint has already achieved
D.R.T. is offline  
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 08:08 (Ref:980875)   #28
single keel
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 62
single keel should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Do not like the rules at all. When you give all the cars the same characterstics, they are all fast/slow in the same areas, hence passing is very difficult. IMO, a better solution is to further differentiate the cars, so cars are quick at different parts of the circuit.
single keel is offline  
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen, 2005....
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 10:26 (Ref:981005)   #29
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I thought NASCAR first came to Australia in 1988 .......

All this control stuff is a joke. Will it really limit the costs? I thought this was a motor racing series, not a spec series.

All these control components will just make the field closer, and isn't the closeness of the cars technically wise nowadays the main catalyst for the processional racing?

The one thing i do like is getting rid of the front airdams. Why can't they get rid of the rear wing properly (no control rear wing) and get them looking like proper cars (ie...like the road goings ones they are meant to be).
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 12:40 (Ref:981242)   #30
Kerri
Veteran
 
Kerri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Australia
Adelaide
Posts: 1,348
Kerri should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridKerri should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oh no racer69, you can't get rid of the spoilers, then they would look to much like Saloon Cars PMP
Kerri is offline  
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 13:00 (Ref:981282)   #31
1200Datto27
Veteran
 
1200Datto27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Australia
Croydon
Posts: 1,534
1200Datto27 has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I know, lets go for the fulsik riceboy look, with massive chunks ofdrag and lift producing plastic, WRX style bonnet scoops, flouros underneath and massive sound systems. Then we will have a real match with what is on the roads

btw, I am being just a little sarcastic here.
1200Datto27 is offline  
__________________
Mos Eisley spaceport, A more wretched hive of scum and villiany you will not find anywhere in the galaxy, we must be careful.
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 13:09 (Ref:981293)   #32
woodbine
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Australia
Peterborough
Posts: 586
woodbine should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by 1200Datto27
I know, lets go for the fulsik riceboy look, with massive chunks ofdrag and lift producing plastic, WRX style bonnet scoops, flouros underneath and massive sound systems. Then we will have a real match with what is on the roads

btw, I am being just a little sarcastic here.
Hey that could be good. Just imagine Cromley and his clipboard "Marcos will be starting on Eminem's latest cd before changing to AC/DC, while there is talk that Mark Skaife will be running Snoop Dogg......."
woodbine is offline  
Quote
Old 24 May 2004, 23:27 (Ref:981991)   #33
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by woodbine
Hey that could be good. Just imagine Cromley and his clipboard "Marcos will be starting on Eminem's latest cd before changing to AC/DC, while there is talk that Mark Skaife will be running Snoop Dogg......."
Greg Rust " So Max what happened down at turn 1"
Max Wilson " Well Greg it was really hard to see around the tacho on the B Pillar as I was going into the turn and I missed the apex and ran a little wide and clipped the wall.But we did some really sic lap times in the morning and the new turbo whistle is a big hit with the fans so all in all an awsome weekend"
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 09:20 (Ref:983577)   #34
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Just one question, how many retrenchments are we to expect from the rule changes in the fabrication,machining and development departments of the big teams? You would have to think around 4-5 people in the bigger teams and 1-2 in the smaller level 2 teams are occupied manufacturing and developing parts.HRT would lose a fair few if they are forced to halt development and buy a large proportion of their bits of say PWR or Larry.Infact if they could even be buying parts off SBR or FPR. All in all say somewhere between 65 and 80 people could face possible redundancy.Added bonus I guess is if all the parts are the same you would be able to have one truck that carried a whole host of spares that fit every car and buy parts on a "as required" basis.
Then you could get rid of the B Doubles the teams have had to buy so they could sell them at a loss,get a tax break on that and save even more money on rego and fuel and tyres.Tracks would not have to build as big a paddoclk area to fit them in.
It's all good
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 10:00 (Ref:983625)   #35
pete55
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
sunshine coast Qld
Posts: 6,387
pete55 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think it is mostly good. What does worry me is the aerodynamic reductions especially on tracks such as Bathurst, Philip Island (if it gets a round) and Eastern Creek. I feel with the car specs as they will be especially power wise, they will still be too fast and too powerful in comparison with aerodynamic grip.
pete55 is offline  
__________________
Life is all about Ass. You're either covering it, kissing it, kicking it, laughing it off, busting it or trying to get a piece of it.
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 10:26 (Ref:983643)   #36
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well Seieria's had bugger all grip and not the widest of tyres so I guess they just have to slow down.
I don't think it will be a step forward, we may as well just go NASCAR and be done with it. The smart people will get bored and leave if paint colour becomes the only "freedoms" in the category.
Like imagine for one second that anyone bar MoTeC would get the deal on the dash's.Larry had to buy all new ECU's a few years ago as he used some other brand retrain his staff to work with the system etc and they said that they suffered for a period of time whilst adjusting to it., if HRT have to switch to Motec,think of the software etc that is all Pi compatible and may no longer work,even the ability to look at an old lap for comparison will be harder to do,or Pi get the deal and what 26 of the 32 cars all chuck out there dashes and whack $20+K worth of Pi into there cars and train all there staff on how to use it, configure all new dash's and functions and no doubt a new bunch of "hot keys" on the laptops. At the moment everyone has a dash and staff and computers that talk to them,what is the point of changing it.It's just change for the sake of it.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 13:09 (Ref:983832)   #37
vortexo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Brisbane
Posts: 1,005
vortexo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Jnr has reported in the paper that all components will be subcontracted out - the cheapest quote will get the contract - if this were to be true it would certainly cut back on the number of team members.
vortexo is offline  
__________________
»-(¯`v´¯)-» vørtex ©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~
v8 Supercars Holden/Toyota/Ford
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 14:06 (Ref:983904)   #38
Bigguy
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 472
Bigguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Surely you guys can see the writing on the wall... the constant escalation of campaign costs in simply not sustainable. It is all very well the bemoan the loss of jobs if there is widespread switching to control components, but the alternative is whole teams going bust because they can no longer afford to be competitive. Then sponsors start to query the justification for spending such huge amounts, and the whole house of cards collapses.

THAT is what the TEGA board is trying to avoid.

I would like them to standardise on control glassfibre panels as well - I mean who are they kidding insisting on "factory" steel panels... the cars are not Holdens or Fords, but race cars built from the ground up, so as long as they look like real ones, who cares, as long as it can save major costs.
Bigguy is offline  
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 21:50 (Ref:984463)   #39
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
We may well bemoan the lost of jobs as about the only employee in motorsport an reduction infact reduces the size of the pool that exsists and makes it harder for new comers to join,where would a budding young engineer hone his skills? You have Sam Micheal as now head of Williams Engineering dept and Chris Dwyer as Micheal Schumachers engineer.What is PROCAR going to employ all these bods? most of the parts like suspension etc are fairly cheap to make in house,sure lock in some of the spec's but let a team build there own stuff if they desire.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 22:05 (Ref:984481)   #40
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
There's going to be a heck of a lot more lost jobs if costs keep spiraling and we wind up with 4 cars in the series...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 26 May 2004, 22:15 (Ref:984489)   #41
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
IF that did occur maybe but I doubt it.Some peole ar comparing it with the BTCC of old and F1 now in reducing costs but we are not even in that league. @ litre was way to expensive,and why not you had rules that allowed engines to be run in reverse all sorts of stuff going on.Most things are fairly tightly controled now anyway.I doubt that you would see huge savings in making things redundant that exsist today.People are setting up ne teams,teams are running junior programs,new cars and trucks appear regulary at venues,merchandising is huge and has way more potenial than is currently explioted.But hey look at the V8 site to see how well it is being marketed.I am understanding of the need to contain costs but ripping the guts out of the teams and cars to reduce costs seems dumb,

Do you rise to the challenge or lobby that the task may be adjusted to your comfort zone to measure achievement and success.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 27 May 2004, 05:14 (Ref:984687)   #42
Techo
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 334
Techo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with Onlooker & Louonline.
Costs are ok, if ya can't afford it don't play !
The cost saving wil be passed on the cream grabbers anyway, as the sponsors aren't given discounts.
It's supposed to be our Top class series.
Slow & steady change is cost effective, many quick changes will cost.
I would think a selection of controlled brake packages would be OK....( one thing at a time )
But then again the richer teams will spend more money getting an edge on the others anyway.
Who says it costs too much anyway ?
Techo is offline  
Quote
Old 27 May 2004, 05:41 (Ref:984697)   #43
pete55
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
sunshine coast Qld
Posts: 6,387
pete55 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quoted by Techo
Who says it costs too much anyway ?

Most of the teams, that's who.
pete55 is offline  
__________________
Life is all about Ass. You're either covering it, kissing it, kicking it, laughing it off, busting it or trying to get a piece of it.
Quote
Old 27 May 2004, 05:51 (Ref:984703)   #44
Techo
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 334
Techo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Never heard FPR say it's too expensive !
HRT & SBR have been around for a while & never heard them whinging either...
Cheap I say..why else would OUTSIDERS snap up teams, must BE PROFITABLE...!!! of course they still have to learn a bit, everything tight chaps, off we go.
Techo is offline  
Quote
Old 27 May 2004, 22:20 (Ref:985534)   #45
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Was it not Roland Dane who said at the rate we are going, costs will continue to rise, and we'll go down the road of the BTCC. Why not fix things now before things become knackered?...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 27 May 2004, 22:34 (Ref:985550)   #46
Chucky
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Australia
Port Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,767
Chucky should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Techo
The cost saving wil be passed on the cream grabbers anyway, as the sponsors aren't given discounts.
Exactly, this latest round of rot will end up costing the have nots to implement it and giving the haves a better margin.

The best way to manage costs is to let nature take it's course. When the dollars start drying up, they'll figure out pretty darn quick how to economically make a race car.

Although the FG panels are a good idea.
Chucky is offline  
__________________
"...full of sound and fury, yet signifying nothing...."
Quote
Old 28 May 2004, 15:23 (Ref:986399)   #47
vortexo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Brisbane
Posts: 1,005
vortexo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
TEGA met on Thursday and formed a technical committee to iron out any problems with the changes - Larco is leading the charge on this.

The noise from TEGA is that items like brake calipers will be common to all teams but items like tail shafts can still be made by the teams to TEGA specs.

(Apparently some teams are using different tail shafts in qualifying and on race day.)

R Dane is a committee member.

The aero pack is being down graded to increase braking distances so that passing can be made a better option.

The lap times should not change significantly.
vortexo is offline  
__________________
»-(¯`v´¯)-» vørtex ©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~
v8 Supercars Holden/Toyota/Ford
Quote
Old 28 May 2004, 21:28 (Ref:986704)   #48
Average Punter
Veteran
 
Average Punter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Australia
a drug store in Wagga
Posts: 1,661
Average Punter should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAverage Punter should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAverage Punter should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
So Larry's move to sell his L1 all makes sense.....

He'd be able to engineer and manufacture components for half the field
Average Punter is offline  
__________________
Punters Beer Fest. Indy 02, Clipsal 03, Winton 04, Paperclip 05, Darwin 06, Oran Park 07, Phillip Island 08, Sandown 09, Townsville 10, Symmons 11, Eastern Creek 12, Winton 13. Townsville 14. Paperclip 15, Sandown 16, Symmons 17, PI 18, The Bend 19
Quote
Old 29 May 2004, 00:06 (Ref:986802)   #49
vortexo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Brisbane
Posts: 1,005
vortexo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
0/t
Actually with the test restrictions on Larry richo is getting very nervious.
vortexo is offline  
__________________
»-(¯`v´¯)-» vørtex ©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~
v8 Supercars Holden/Toyota/Ford
Quote
Old 29 May 2004, 00:14 (Ref:986807)   #50
vortexo
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location:
Brisbane
Posts: 1,005
vortexo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
.........and TEGA are looking at a much harder tyre compound.
vortexo is offline  
__________________
»-(¯`v´¯)-» vørtex ©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~
v8 Supercars Holden/Toyota/Ford
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has TEGA done a backflip? pete55 Australasian Touring Cars. 11 7 Jan 2005 10:33
Tega Cameras Bradley Australasian Touring Cars. 5 16 Feb 2004 09:56
Tega pete55 Australasian Touring Cars. 30 22 Apr 2003 02:38
TEGA gets TOUGH on HRO. V8 Fan Australasian Touring Cars. 25 19 Mar 2003 21:39
TEGA Revolt??? RaceTime Australasian Touring Cars. 13 16 Apr 2002 22:08


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.