|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
10 Dec 2001, 07:38 (Ref:184197) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,221
|
Were there any other sub-2-litre cars at Aintree then?
Is it possibly the supplementary regulations for the event precluded these and this subterfuge was simply to get a start? Of course, the old Citroen gearbox was hard pressed enough dealing with 2-litres, of course. |
||
|
10 Dec 2001, 08:38 (Ref:184211) | #27 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Dec 2001, 08:58 (Ref:184216) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,221
|
Well, maybe we're on the track of the reason then... supp regs that stipulated over 2-litre cars only. Otherwise you could be sure someone would have tried to run an Alta, a Cooper Bristol or something.
|
||
|
10 Dec 2001, 11:05 (Ref:184239) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 791
|
Setright, in "Grand Prix Car 1954-66", says specifically that one of the two Coopers at Rouen (presumably Brabham's) had an engine enlarged to 1.9 litres, while the other (MacDowell?) was a straight F2.
For the British GP he says 1.9 litres again for the works car, with the Walker car being 'similar'. At Caen, Setright says one of the Coopers ran with a 2.0 litre engine - Sheldon says both Brooks (Walker car) and Salvadori (works) had this displacement. We then jump to 1958 with Moss' famous victory in Argentina, still with 2 litres behind him and Monaco, where Trintignant also has a 2 litre Walker car (a new chassis with the old engine?). However, Setright now comes up trumps - Of the two factory-entered cars, one had a 2-litre Coventry Climax engine, the other a new one of 2.2 litres. So, no 2.2 before Monaco 1958 .... Last edited by Vitesse; 10 Dec 2001 at 11:07. |
||
|
10 Dec 2001, 17:43 (Ref:184335) | #30 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 95
|
THe 2015cc engine used by Walker cars in early 1958 was an Alf Francis special, built before Climax came up with the 2.2 litre engine. The extra 55cc that Francis achieved over the 1960cc engine can't have had much effect on performance and I can't help but wonder why he did it.
Jack Brabham had an over 2-litre engine built by Repco for the 1958 Australian races. I assume that Setright's references to 1.9 litres and 2.0 litres (Vitesse's post) are the same thing. 1960cc is equivalent to 2.0 litres to one place of decimals, but many people would express it as 1.9. |
||
|
22 Dec 2001, 04:40 (Ref:188627) | #31 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
The new rules restricted boring to 0.040"... in the case of a Cooper S this meant a stretch of 35cc. Everyone did it, and they must have reckoned it was worthwhile because they kept on doing it. And I don't mean only among the Minis... |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aintree remembered | Speedy norm | Motorsport History | 39 | 26 Jan 2009 13:57 |
Aintree - Car Racing? | KayBee | National & Club Racing | 13 | 11 Jan 2005 11:12 |
Aintree festival | Speedy norm | Historic Racing Today | 19 | 10 Dec 2004 10:02 |
Who's going to Aintree 19-21 ? | Ian Lewis | Marshals Forum | 10 | 19 Nov 2004 18:48 |
Aintree Festival of Speed | MikeM | National & Club Racing | 1 | 5 Jun 2004 16:05 |