|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Sep 2013, 11:03 (Ref:3301423) | #6526 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Is hard to predict, next year there will be a radical regulamentation change, is not like 2011 where the change basicly was: lmp2 engines in lmp1, fin and wider front tires.
What could be predicted is that at least in the first year cars will generate less downforce by the only bodywork because of 190cm width and less mechanical grip because of new lmp2 size tires, so in tracks that require an HDF setting like silverstone I think that 2014 cars will be slower than now. On the other side of the coin, because of -30kg break, lower drag design and hybrid boost 2014 work lmp1 will have a shredder acceleration and an higher top speed, so in tracks le mans (or fuji) that don't require an HDF setting I think that will be able to run under 3.25 already in the first year. |
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 11:36 (Ref:3301432) | #6527 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 246
|
Although i didn't read the new rules carefully, my understanding is that yes, cars will be 10 cm narrower, but they can now have a 1800 mm wide rear wing and a full working front wing.
DonĀ“t know the restrictions on their positions, though. Did i understand right? How big do you guys think the downforce reduction will be? i would say it is not simply new DownForce = (new front section / old front section)* currrent downforce since they should gain something back with the new wings regulations. |
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 12:01 (Ref:3301448) | #6528 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
I would suggest reading the article entitled "Movements in LMP1 aero" in the latest issue of RCE. It assesses and sums up the impact of the new rules in terms of expected levels of downforce and aero efficiency. If one trusts the conclusion of the article, the cars may be able to achieve pretty similar and possibly slighty better aero in 2014 compared to 2013.
|
||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
10 Sep 2013, 12:10 (Ref:3301449) | #6529 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 246
|
hope October RCE will be delivered to my door before the start of next season then!
They are not so fast here in Germany unfortunately. |
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 12:38 (Ref:3301464) | #6530 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Yeah, in 2014 regulamentations the front splitter basicly can be turned in a sort of F1 concept front wing. The 2014 specs will last longer than 3 years, so time after time and race by race, engineers will be able to develope bodyworks with a better aero efficency than 2011-2013 specs lmp1, that is sure. Don't know if this will be achieved already in 2014.
Anyway the mechanical grip lost with the tires downsizing can't be recovered so easily... rear tires will have to support all that torque coming from engine+hybrid boost. An other critical feature will be the weight ratio, 2 different electric engines + batteries or supercapacitors + thermal engine to place inside the chassis with a wished weight of under 870kg to have an optimal weight distribution. |
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 12:55 (Ref:3301471) | #6531 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,203
|
I doubt there will be significant change in terms of braking performance, unless they get similar improvement in tire grip. All that deceleration should still be transmitted through 4 small patches of that black magical stuff. Cars are to become somewhat lighter though, that should help.
|
||
|
10 Sep 2013, 18:50 (Ref:3301599) | #6532 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
With smaller tyres but possibly more power especially out of the corners, maybe there is little hope that the cars will look slightly more loose and more often "out of control"? Despite AWD, traction control and probably pretty advanced KERS electronics taming the boost, but there is always a trade-off... Now it is so rare to see especially top LMP1s to have any kind of visible slides or opposite lock moments.
|
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 18:55 (Ref:3301601) | #6533 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Sep 2013, 18:57 (Ref:3301603) | #6534 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Sep 2013, 19:05 (Ref:3301609) | #6535 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
Hope that porsche won't hire pedro lamy or vanina ickx to oppugn my theory. |
||
|
10 Sep 2013, 19:52 (Ref:3301624) | #6536 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
I did not mean spinning, but generally less stable car in the corner exists, resulting in more corrections. Because of AWD exact opposite might happen.
Spinning is boring, seeing a car getting out of the corner in an aggressive manner once in a while is exciting. Last edited by deggis; 10 Sep 2013 at 19:57. |
|
|
10 Sep 2013, 21:42 (Ref:3301713) | #6537 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 08:20 (Ref:3301924) | #6538 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 20:31 (Ref:3302348) | #6539 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 20:35 (Ref:3302353) | #6540 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 65
|
The rear wing will be the same width as it is now, cars are just narrower.
|
|
|
11 Sep 2013, 20:50 (Ref:3302364) | #6541 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
The higher hybrid power will only be available for a short period. Assuming a hybrid system of 450 kW, the system will only be active for 18 sec during a lap of 3m30 = 210 sec. For the rest of the lap, the car will be driven by a less powerfull internal combustion engine. |
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 20:57 (Ref:3302374) | #6542 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
Anyway, audi and toyota because of double plates basicly have a rear wing 200cm wide. Next year will be less wide. |
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 21:16 (Ref:3302396) | #6543 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 22:01 (Ref:3302425) | #6544 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 65
|
||
|
11 Sep 2013, 22:11 (Ref:3302429) | #6545 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Sep 2013, 08:15 (Ref:3302572) | #6546 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
Excuse me, who was comparing lmp2? First of all, lmp2 cars were close to 3.30 only before the 2011 lmp2 regulamentatin, when an lmp2 car was lighter than 900kg and was powered by full born race engines that currently are used in lmp1. In 2011 lmp2 pole was 3.41, this year was close to 3.38. Like work lmp1, lmp2 improved of 3 seconds at le mans in 3 years, but I guess is a bit far from 3.30, don't you agree?
Is useless to compare lmp2, super GT or LMGTP because work 2014 lmp1 will be however able to run under 3.30 at le mans already in 2014 (my bet is 3.25). There will be an higher top speed at mulsanne and a huge better acceleration in slow point like mulsanne corner and arnage, to compensate, the price to pay will be a slower ride on porsche sector. |
|
|
12 Sep 2013, 10:38 (Ref:3302634) | #6547 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
2014 p1s might well be marginally slower than 2013's, simply because they will be brand new cars on narrower tires with engines tuned for fuel efficiency.
If there is a difference, it will likely be slight, as the differences are slight and in some ways balance out (less downforce but also less drag, less mechanical grip but front wings and wider rear wings, narrower tires for less grip but less drag ...) Either way, by 2015 I;'d bet they will be right back at pre-2014 speeds. Engineers Always seem to figure out ways to go faster while the rules always find ways to slow the cars, and we end up with about the same speeds every time. I am particularly interested to see what the various teams do with economy/hybrid balance. I wonder if for some races it will be possible to eliminate a stop or two by running extra-efficiently, or to push the economy limit and make up for the extra stop with quicker laps. I imagine the teams will be learning on the fly, and fine-tuning both engines (brand new) and hybrid systems (either all-new or mush bigger) with tire and drivetrain loads, and economy, and discovering a lot of stuff they can do. I can deal with cars being a second or two slower per lap for a year if there are a lot more strategy options. |
|
|
12 Sep 2013, 17:01 (Ref:3302864) | #6548 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 407
|
The less drag matter in my opinion is smoke in the eyes. Will be extremely important only at le mans, where manufacturers already use low drag car. In all tracks but le mans audi uses an HDF setting, that basicly means also high drag package!
In a not le mans like track I think that is more important how fast you can run a turn than to have 3 or 4 km/h more on top speed. Basicly the lower drag will be close to useless before and after le mans. |
|
|
12 Sep 2013, 17:48 (Ref:3302894) | #6549 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
That's a good point, and with the narrower tires, downforce might need to be increased even more. Interesting to see how it goes.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2013, 22:38 (Ref:3303032) | #6550 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] Toyota plans Le Mans return with hybrid! | Bentley03 | 24 Heures du Mans | 424 | 8 Nov 2010 19:56 |
[LM24] Best LMP1/LMP900/LMGTP Manufacturer of the '00s at Le Mans | Danny_GT2 | 24 Heures du Mans | 11 | 11 Aug 2009 18:26 |
[LM24] Acura Heading to Le Mans in 2008 and LMP1 in 2009 | Mal | 24 Heures du Mans | 45 | 11 Jul 2007 23:05 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |