|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Mar 2016, 08:26 (Ref:3626216) | #6776 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
2016 livery...yes
2016 bodywork... don´t think so!!!!!! |
||
|
23 Mar 2016, 08:43 (Ref:3626224) | #6777 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 08:58 (Ref:3626231) | #6778 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 09:22 (Ref:3626237) | #6779 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Quote:
"In 2016 the 919 will start the season running a high downforce package. It will be tackling Le Mans with an extremely low downforce configuration and will have another high downforce package for the following six WEC races". - Porsche |
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 09:35 (Ref:3626239) | #6780 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
I may have an explanation: It is possible that Porsche is quoting total power at Le Mans (with the hybrid power capped), whilst Audi is quoting non-Le Mans configuration.
|
||
|
23 Mar 2016, 09:51 (Ref:3626243) | #6781 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
power figures official statements are a joke... only engineers know real data. I just think that because of engine updates and developements, the loss of hp from thermal engine because of most recent fuel flow values will be minimal and timelaps will be close to 2015. Only at le mans unlikely we will see again 3.16 because of 1000hp limit.
It doesn't exist 1000hp or 900hp... max power changes time after time, because there are infinite situations and variables (ERS settings, ERS maps, battery degradation, long or short boost release, etc....) |
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 09:58 (Ref:3626244) | #6782 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Quote:
The main purpose of my observation is to try and understand the discrepancy in the claimed output from one marque and the other. 100 bhp is quite significant. |
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 10:10 (Ref:3626249) | #6783 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
claims are just words and numbers to write a press release...
early in 2014 there was toyota "PRring" with his >1200hp and the "little" audi with only 800hp... |
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 10:14 (Ref:3626253) | #6784 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Yes, this could be an explanation: Just words.
Let's hope. |
||
|
23 Mar 2016, 11:12 (Ref:3626263) | #6785 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Here is the car with what looks like a high downforce package:
http://www.porsche.com/usa/eventsand...rs/919-hybrid/ Last edited by Spyderman; 23 Mar 2016 at 11:18. |
||
|
23 Mar 2016, 12:30 (Ref:3626284) | #6786 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
23 Mar 2016, 12:50 (Ref:3626292) | #6787 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
I remember when both Audi and Peugeot kept insisting that their cars had around 550hp during the peak of the Diesel-battle years when Alex Wurz years later later revealed that the 908 had an excess of 800hp
|
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 13:05 (Ref:3626299) | #6788 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
really bad new livery for porsche in my opinion. it almost looks like the cars crashed before their presentation with all that black concentrated on the front of the car.
|
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 13:19 (Ref:3626303) | #6789 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Like this livery MUCH more than the old one, but I'm still hoping for LM oneoff colors again.
|
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 13:25 (Ref:3626305) | #6790 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
the red and black ones were really beautiful last year indeed. but as the german custom predicts, it was still the white one of the three to win.
|
|
|
23 Mar 2016, 13:51 (Ref:3626324) | #6791 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
I'm not a great fan of this new livery. It looks ok from some angles and less so from others.
I would have nothing against an all white car with some black, red and yellow accents. |
||
|
23 Mar 2016, 13:54 (Ref:3626325) | #6792 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 15:26 (Ref:3626349) | #6793 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,199
|
New livery is much better, but far short of what could be done. It is amazing how much they spent to create cars that have a boring livery, or livery that can be easily confused with a competitor.
Richard |
|
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
23 Mar 2016, 16:09 (Ref:3626368) | #6794 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
23 Mar 2016, 23:46 (Ref:3626522) | #6795 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,167
|
I think he was speaking of the V12 5,5 litres of 2010. The V8 3,7 litres was supposed to give 550 hp, but not much more.
|
||
|
24 Mar 2016, 02:21 (Ref:3626550) | #6796 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
I'm so disappointed in the livery (which is a lazy effort in my opinion)and the 919's overall evolution. The pictures on the Porsche media site are last years photos edited with the new livery!
|
||
|
24 Mar 2016, 02:46 (Ref:3626554) | #6797 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,860
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
24 Mar 2016, 03:02 (Ref:3626558) | #6798 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
I don't get the bashing of this livery, it's very nice to me.
Very underwhelming aero development there and I expect Porsche to fight with Toyota, miles behind the much faster R18 "After intense testing in February, an increase in performance on the part of the Michelin tyres is expected." Toyota was like this last year, they improved 2s but most of that came from Michelin and it seems Porsche will rely mostly on them this year too as ERS is on the ceiling and the aero it way too conservative. |
|
|
24 Mar 2016, 05:22 (Ref:3626563) | #6799 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Different strokes for different folks.
Quote:
Also - At this stage of the game, there is no evidence at all (other than your suspicion) that Audi is much quicker than either Porsche or Toyota. Quote:
This may very well be the case (although right now there is little evidence besides our reading in between the lines). It may be one of the reasons behind Hitzinger's desire to move on to a more challenging project. |
||||
|
24 Mar 2016, 06:23 (Ref:3626571) | #6800 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
Audi being faster is a guess right now. But based on last year, they'll need to step it up big time. They were slower over one lap and a stint. And Porsche could go further on a stint, not to mention their refueling trick. It'll be interesting to see how Audi and Toyota respond.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] The Unified Power Rankings (GTP / Hypercar) | GT3_Fan | ACO Regulated Series | 125 | 12 Nov 2024 15:16 |
Lamborghini GTP / Hypercar: weigh in | veeten | North American Racing | 95 | 9 Nov 2024 01:11 |
Cadillac GTP / Hypercar: Fan favorite | Adam43 | North American Racing | 68 | 22 Aug 2024 08:10 |
Are there any differnces between a Porsche carerra cup Porsche and GT3 class Porsche? | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 25 | 6 Feb 2008 21:06 |
Joest Porsche VS Factory Porsche | H16 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 10 | 20 Dec 2001 14:07 |