|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Jun 2007, 12:51 (Ref:1944902) | #51 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Is it me, or does that picture labelled "Schuey tries the 250 DTO prototipo for the first time" look 'shopped?
|
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
23 Jun 2007, 12:59 (Ref:1944907) | #52 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,178
|
Welcome to 10-10ths.
and it is a brilliant link, especially the date of the article! Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
23 Jun 2007, 13:03 (Ref:1944909) | #53 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,338
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Jun 2007, 13:42 (Ref:1944923) | #54 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
Does that look like an LMP2 Pilbeam to you? |
|||
|
23 Jun 2007, 14:00 (Ref:1944941) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,936
|
i was about to say that bob but you beat me to it, that is no ferrari 250 proto, thats a pilbeam MP93 in green with a few ferrari stickers on it, and i have to say that photo does not look very real at all to me, something just not right about it.
|
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 14:24 (Ref:1944956) | #56 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 47
|
that article is dated 1st APRIL 07
|
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 14:25 (Ref:1944957) | #57 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,178
|
Yes 2007, this year
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
23 Jun 2007, 14:29 (Ref:1944959) | #58 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 47
|
lol
|
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 14:45 (Ref:1944967) | #59 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,894
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 14:53 (Ref:1944977) | #60 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4
|
Hi guys
I think you may be right about the photo. However the story could be true! |
|
|
23 Jun 2007, 16:01 (Ref:1945011) | #61 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 234
|
I just spent ages trying to decide if the helmet was photoshopped in and didnt bother to scroll down the page! Doh! I guess that answers my question
|
|
|
23 Jun 2007, 16:17 (Ref:1945015) | #62 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Jun 2007, 16:51 (Ref:1945027) | #63 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,178
|
Even ignoring the above story, it is possible that the ACO may allow diesels in LMP2. There are many things that aren't allowed, until you ask! If anything could do it it might be a road car based engine, for a customer team, in a class that is percieved to be weak?
Last edited by Adam43; 23 Jun 2007 at 16:54. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
23 Jun 2007, 16:56 (Ref:1945029) | #64 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 234
|
Thats a good point, I really don't see the ACO saying no to a diesel P2, motorsport is trying to become (or at least appear) more environmentally friendly, why would they allow LMP1 to go diesel but not LMP2?
|
|
|
23 Jun 2007, 17:04 (Ref:1945031) | #65 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Adam, But don't you think there would be a rule change to allow them before someone put time and money into the project?
|
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 17:23 (Ref:1945039) | #66 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,178
|
Yes, they would want assurances from the ACO that it would be allowed. However I am talking more generally than the story highlighted here.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
23 Jun 2007, 18:09 (Ref:1945061) | #67 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Of course and in reality, so am I. I just can't see anyone developing and funding something that is outside the rules, hoping to somehow get it allowed at a later date. Sorta goes against 'normal' thought process of building something that is within the rules in the first place. Yes, anyone can build anything they want outside any rule set and then attempt to get it allowed, but who would really take that chance?
Look at the MC12 that was built to the rules, only to have the rules change and be left standing on the outside looking in (with no hope of having their car ever allowed in an ACO sanctioned race). |
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 18:42 (Ref:1945083) | #68 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4
|
The Ferrari would be inside the rules because it is bio-diesel which ACO could allow under the current rules for LMP2.
|
|
|
23 Jun 2007, 18:50 (Ref:1945085) | #69 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Where does it state that?
And for that matter, where does it state that bio-fuels are legal too? I can't find it in the AOC rules. Last edited by Hugewally; 23 Jun 2007 at 18:57. |
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 18:52 (Ref:1945086) | #70 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Art. 5.1 for engine specifications and Art. 17 for fuel. Biofuels might be legal next year (Audi and others are interested) and Welter is planning a diesel P2, so that rule might also change. |
|||
|
23 Jun 2007, 19:15 (Ref:1945096) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Arn't WR supposed to come back in 2008 with a bio-fuel ?
Maybe thats a clue as to a possible rule change , cuz im sure Gerard Welter wouldnt go ahead with that , without the approval of the ACO . |
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 19:28 (Ref:1945106) | #72 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,894
|
Quote:
http://www.welterracing.fr/team/_FR/WR_2008.html (Great looking car ) http://www.welterracing.fr/team/_FR/projet2008.html Diester = French bio-diesel brand? |
||
|
23 Jun 2007, 20:57 (Ref:1945123) | #73 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chevrolet WTCC Ultra diesel car, debut in 2007 or 2008! | FIRE | Touring Car Racing | 48 | 26 May 2007 15:51 |
Which LMP2 car? | I love 04s | Sportscar & GT Racing | 62 | 29 Dec 2006 22:19 |
Ferrari to build new generation LMP | pink69 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 66 | 4 May 2002 19:12 |
Ferrari won't build 550's | pink69 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 7 | 17 Dec 2001 09:53 |