|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
7 Mar 2004, 11:23 (Ref:896874) | #51 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Mar 2004, 11:27 (Ref:896878) | #52 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
7 Mar 2004, 11:37 (Ref:896887) | #53 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,577
|
Despite the result an enjoyable race I feel. The Ferrari's were clearly very quick but it would have been the same last year had it not rained so there's no real need to panic just yet.
The McLarens are in trouble, they could we be the Williams of last year though and come good in a few races time. Montoya looked combative all afternoon and that was nice to see, it kept the race interesting. He made an error at the start, but he got his head down and dug himself out of his own mess until the pitstops intervened. Having passed Ralf earlier in the race he deserved 4th place and lost out big time in the pitstops. Ralf chose to circulate as usual. Button looked very impressive, as did Alonso. It would have been nice to see how close Montoya could have run FA had he not made the mistake at the start, I think we missed the chance of seeing a good scrap there. Overall, and despite the result, I feel this has set up the season very nicely. Ferrari looked leagues ahead yes, but the track and conditions suited them perfectly. Alonso and Button look genuinely fast and we have the old Montoya back, looking far more hungry and racey than he did at the end of last season. If McLaren can get up to speed then you can hopefully add Kimi to the mix us well. I not worried and am already looking forward to Malaysia. |
||
__________________
Brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds: "A-bunch-a-munch-crunch-a-human" |
7 Mar 2004, 11:40 (Ref:896894) | #54 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Well, that was slightly dissapointing given the build up, but nevertheless, not the end of the world.
The gap to Ferrari is exaggerated I feel by a perfect day for them......the temperatures were ideal for their tyres, their main challenger went off at turn one and got stuck in traffic all day, on a Ferrari track etc, etc.... They could have lapped everyone rather worryingly...... Can Williams and Renault close the gap? Well, think to last year.......Montoya and Alonso took dominant wins but were pegged back at Monza by ferrari immediately. It could all change like that, and Malaysia should suit Michelin down to the ground. It is a big gap to peg back however.... I don't want to talk about McLaren. Embarrassing to put it politely..... |
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 12:06 (Ref:896924) | #55 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
WHat in hells name was thaT??? Ferrari 1-2... ho hum.. bore bore bore.... lets hope Malaysia is better
|
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
7 Mar 2004, 12:08 (Ref:896929) | #56 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
What a load or Do they favour Ferrari? Well DER!!! Of course they do, its their best team and they put most of their resorces behind them. Should they plow equal money into Minardi? If the answer is yes, let your wife take care of the finances from now on. Do you really think Michellin put equal resources into Williams and Jaguar? |
|||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
7 Mar 2004, 12:10 (Ref:896931) | #57 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Having said that though, the race behind the Ferraris was pretty good. So I didn't lose interest at all.
The thing that bugs the most is the new rules.......why not stick to last years rules, they were very successful. And the engine rule is horrible....if all we see every race is 20 cars driving to the line in first gear, then I will be slightly upset frankly.... As I say though, things will get better. |
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 12:12 (Ref:896933) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 729
|
Webber wasn't special today? Maybe. But if he was something average, alot of other drivers need to buck up.
From what I saw, Webber had qualified 6th in one of the heaviest fuelled cars, managed to maintain 8th after he was slow off the line due to a little wheelspin (and that weight handicap), and then managed to keep in touch with the Williams of Montoya and a slightly damaged Trulli, Possibly the second and third best cars out there. In about the 5th or 6th best car. (Only the Toyotas, Jordans, Minardis and Saubers looked clearly worse, while the Macs seemed to be on different strategy.) Webber posted quicker racing laps on his second set of tyres than on his first within laps of coming out of the pits with heavy fuel on, indicating the previous tyres had been out of sorts. So nothing spectacular, but he was doing a damn good job in the Jag. |
||
__________________
Gawky supermodels may look stunning in the right clothes, on the right catwalk, in the right city, but in an M&S jumper, on a crowded street, on a wet Wednesday afternoon, only classic good looks will catch the eye. - Ian Eveleigh. |
7 Mar 2004, 12:13 (Ref:896934) | #59 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
He looked pretty solid to me.....
|
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 12:21 (Ref:896941) | #60 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
Webber was good today...
Massa was his erratic self and Fisi didnt look quick at all..... JPM and RS solid if not spectacular.... |
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
7 Mar 2004, 12:25 (Ref:896948) | #61 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Massa's usual erratic self with small offs and a spin still had him ahead of Fisichella until he retired.
Make of that what you will.... |
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 12:37 (Ref:896959) | #62 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
i can see... no ones mentioning Alonso... But WHAT A STAR we have.... almost 1.5 secs a lap faster than Trulli... and he kept it together... WHAT A START.... solid race....
|
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
7 Mar 2004, 12:39 (Ref:896962) | #63 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Alonso did a very good job.
On "Michelin days" he'll win a few races this year. |
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 12:45 (Ref:896963) | #64 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Trulli is supposed to have his car damaged after the first corner...that's the official reason for the poor performance.
I agree that today's conditions had perhaps favoured Ferrari/BS more. I have little doubt that there would come races where it suits Michelins runners more and we'd see Michelins dominate..hopefully BS plugs the gap too in hot conditions. |
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
7 Mar 2004, 13:06 (Ref:896988) | #66 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 33
|
Rookie Christian Klien did rather well don't you think? He overtook Panis and stayed out of trouble. Finishing 11th was a good result for him.
|
||
|
7 Mar 2004, 13:38 (Ref:897029) | #67 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 897
|
All credit to ferrari once again they have produced an outstanding car. Ok one race down 17 to go is there any cause for concern i think there is. While watching the coverage on ITV Martin Bdundle said something during the race which i think really sums the whole thing up he said towards the end of the race that the both ferrari,s have really reduced there pace quite alot he then laughed and said that they where still quicker than the rest of the field. The problem we have here is ferrari have done such a fantastic job with there car that they will be so far ahead that they will have ne need to get involed in racing they can do there own thing its just like two are three sprints pending on how many stops the race requires.But i think there is an even bigger cause for concern not to far away and thats the PRESS they are going to slate this big time
|
||
|
7 Mar 2004, 13:38 (Ref:897030) | #68 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
Great job by Ferrari. A real pity no one could match them, but that is their fault.
And Michael Schumacher joins Lex Davison as the only drivers to win the Australian Grand Prix 4 times. |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
7 Mar 2004, 13:51 (Ref:897044) | #69 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
7 Mar 2004, 14:07 (Ref:897056) | #70 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
Quote:
Contrary to what some here had said its not a lack of power that was BAR's biggest problem, it was tires as I said. They could set fast times but not consistent times. Their fast laps dont reflect their pace because if they had pushed harder they would have torn the tires up even more. BAR may be in for a hard time with the Michelins. At least they dont have to wait for Williams's, Renaults or anyones approval to run the tires they feel they need. |
|||
__________________
Eventually we learn |
7 Mar 2004, 14:10 (Ref:897061) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Mar 2004, 14:19 (Ref:897068) | #72 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
|
I think Ferrari has done a decent job today.
Too early to decide whether or not they will be dominant this year, though ... We don't know how the Williams cars would have done, if Ralf wouldn't have made a mistake in qualifying, and if Montoya wouldn't have made a mistake at the first corner. I think both had a solid performance today. McLaren clearly has got a problem at this moment. But I would suppose thay are trying to solve that problem. And I would expect that they are perfectly capable of solving it. Renault showed today that both drivers are competitive. They are capable of holding their first lap positions against (almost) any competitor. And even without launch control they can make very goog starts. Not quite certain about BAR yet. |
|
|
7 Mar 2004, 14:25 (Ref:897073) | #73 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,157
|
The replays clearly show Sato booting Trulli up the arse at the first corner which lets him off the hook maybe.
|
|
__________________
Racing is in my...err... I was born to...um... Winning is...things and stuff...etc.. For sure! |
7 Mar 2004, 14:41 (Ref:897088) | #74 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 269
|
Great start for Michael. Kimi's comments pre-season about problems with the McLaren didn't seem exaggerated on that performance.
|
||
__________________
Unless I'm very much mistaken...I am very much mistaken! |
8 Mar 2004, 12:37 (Ref:897990) | #75 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Michigan race result - SPOILER | Kicking-back | IRL Indycar Series | 20 | 2 Aug 2004 22:14 |
Le Mans Predictions #2 - Race Result | Aysedasi | Predictions Competitions | 59 | 26 Jun 2004 06:49 |
[FIA GT] FIA race result site? | hartham | Sportscar & GT Racing | 6 | 24 Jul 2003 21:13 |
Brands Hatch Race 1 result | rdjones | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 1 Apr 2002 18:50 |