|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Jun 2016, 02:30 (Ref:3647029) | #51 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
This was a DP track last year. No surprise it's the same this year. Mazda was only 2 tenths off the Ligier. Both teams in the 25's while the lead DP's are in the 23's. Yeah, doesn't look like it's going to be a great race up front in terms of mixing up the cars. GTD may be interesting, though!
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 04:56 (Ref:3647043) | #52 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
4 Jun 2016, 07:10 (Ref:3647051) | #53 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
Looks like the only way for a P2 car to win is to hope the DP contingent wreaks or make mistakes on pit road.
That last BoP was a dumb, especially with a street course coming up. Idiots. |
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 11:33 (Ref:3647094) | #54 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
I do not honestly believe that IMSA is deliberately fixing the races ... well i don’t always think that ... but Chiana’s point is valid.
No matter who wins, there is always the question of was it the best driver and team, or was this the car that got the best BoP breaks this time around? With cars being adjusted on a race-by-race basis, there is no chance to see if the BoP is right. Okay, this car was fast ... slow it down? Wait, this is racing ... cars are Supposed to be fast. Maybe the engineers got it right and what we saw wasn’t just BoP. Maybe the cars which were slower were less well-prepared for that track. No matter. IMSA will change everything for the next track anyway. There are two reasons I can see for adjusting BoP. Obviously, different levels are needed for Daytona, with its banking, and all the other tracks. And obviously, if something new comes along—like HPD’s bigger V6—then an adjustment is needed. Otherwise, the only reason to adjust BoP would be ... because the series if freaking incompetent to set it correctly anyway. I really don’t care so much anymore about it for the rest of this era ... the DP/P2 era. We have seen nothing but artificial results since this series started. I can accept that for the rest of this season, we will get skewed BoP as we always have. What bothers me, is that IMSA seems likely to continue on with this idiocy even after every car is essentially identical—and that makes me kind of sick. GT3-based series seem to be able to adjust a much wider range of weights, dimensions, chassis and engine types, and can produce excellent racing. IMSA needs to learn from that. Don’t base BoP on practice results. Obviously teams will cheat in practice to win in the race. Have independent test drivers test each car and set its baseline before the season starts, then after Daytona ... and maybe once more after Le Mans if needed. Otherwise, in a series where no real development or modification is allowed, why is constant BoP adjustment needed? Chiana’s real point is that whoever has won in IMSA up until now, has been gifted the win by BoP at least in part. This really does devalue every win. Every other sport in the world strives for fairness and a level playing field; IMSA tries to help whoever lost the last race, at the next race. It is stupid and it devalues each victory. IMSA needs to be told that once everyone has the latest DP, all those BoP games need to Stop. Let the teams and drivers decide the winner, not the stewards and series officials. |
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 11:50 (Ref:3647098) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,190
|
as I've found myself digging too much again: the race event itself on the world clock and the countdown timer
|
||
__________________
Q: How to play religious roulette? A: Stand around in a circle and blaspheme and see who gets struck by lightning first |
4 Jun 2016, 12:53 (Ref:3647104) | #56 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 72
|
I have always felt that once the Nascar faction came to power, the series has been treated as "entertainment" as opposed to a "competition." I think the constant BoP adjustments are just one of the their means to further provide entertainment.
Back in the Can-am days (yes, I am that old) balance of power just meant more cubic inches...when the 917-30 appeared and dominated, nothing was done at the moment to rein it in, and we settled in to watch them mop up for the whole season. Although we had a pretty good idea who would be the victor before the race began, it was still quite enjoyable watching an actual competition. |
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:00 (Ref:3647129) | #57 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
Honestly, I'd rather just see success ballast used as BOP, and nothing else. At least that's upfront and obvious.
Also, does anyone know what links will work for the race in the US? |
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:26 (Ref:3647133) | #58 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
So is anyone else getting a black screen on IMSA.com with a message that says "This video could not be played. Please try again later"?
Is anyone else even watching? |
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:36 (Ref:3647138) | #59 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
http://imsatv.imsa.com Direct media player link: http://imsaintl-lh.akamaihd.net/i/im...3500_av-p.m3u8 Americans: Opera browser's developer version has free built-in VPN. Unlike all other free VPNs it is safe and actually fast. Last edited by deggis; 4 Jun 2016 at 16:43. |
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:39 (Ref:3647140) | #60 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
Not working for me. Oh well. Guess it's too much to ask for anything with this series to be easy.
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:45 (Ref:3647142) | #61 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Quote:
...but now the stream died for me too literally second after green flag. edit: now came back. |
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:48 (Ref:3647145) | #62 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:57 (Ref:3647148) | #63 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,157
|
GOOD JOB!
|
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
4 Jun 2016, 16:57 (Ref:3647149) | #64 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
Did Goossens knew he was without the rear wing?
|
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 16:57 (Ref:3647150) | #65 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,562
|
You'd think you'd notice if your rear wing had just fallen off...
Goosens looks to be fine though. #31 gets tagged as well and has major front left suspension damage, both cars are probably done for today. |
||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
4 Jun 2016, 16:58 (Ref:3647151) | #66 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Marc Goossens is an idiot.
My country has several great, good and decent drivers. Goossens is NOT one of them. |
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:00 (Ref:3647153) | #67 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
Quote:
|
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:00 (Ref:3647154) | #68 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,069
|
Yeah not his finest hour.
|
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
4 Jun 2016, 17:02 (Ref:3647156) | #69 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
I honestly don't understand why that team dropped Westbrook and Valiante and then thought Goossens would do a better job.
|
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:02 (Ref:3647157) | #70 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
I guess if there was any hope of dp's having to stop twice and Mazda winning by only putting once is out the windo now, huh?
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:06 (Ref:3647159) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 740
|
Perhaps someone could explain to me why that Corvette Banner tire barrier that the #90 struck was jutting out a few feet onto the racing surface to begin with?
|
||
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:12 (Ref:3647161) | #72 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
watching at work with the sound off .... interesting race .... I turned on the TV just as Mr. Goosens decided to give the P2s a chance.
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:37 (Ref:3647170) | #73 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
PCs are doing their part. So glad they are in the series.
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:44 (Ref:3647174) | #74 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
Pretty boring and predictable up front.
|
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 17:51 (Ref:3647176) | #75 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
More PC excellence. Bravo!
Up front the only question is which DP will wreck the other. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMSA Race TUSC Round 5: Detroit | joeb | North American Racing | 166 | 5 Jun 2014 02:03 |
FRC 2014 - TUSC Round 5: Detroit | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 14 | 2 Jun 2014 17:30 |
2013 Bet 'Em IndyContest - round 6 Detroit | NaBUru38 | Indycar Series | 11 | 3 Jun 2013 15:04 |
2012 Bet 'Em IndyContest - Detroit round 6 | NaBUru38 | Indycar Series | 5 | 4 Jun 2012 14:14 |
ALMS Round 9 Detroit Aug. 29-31, 08 | HORNDAWG | North American Racing | 150 | 3 Sep 2008 21:19 |