|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Oct 2010, 18:30 (Ref:2770473) | #751 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
|||
|
6 Oct 2010, 20:43 (Ref:2770536) | #752 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14
|
so sad , every race it pass these team fails more.
|
|
|
7 Oct 2010, 13:21 (Ref:2770862) | #753 | |||
Team Crouton
1% Club
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 40,009
|
Quote:
[OLD ARGUMENT]Well no, at Le Mans in the relevant years, Jaguar was better - by the smallest of margins, I admit, on the basis that nothing could conceivably be worse than the performance of a certain Japanese car at Le Mans in 2009...... Just setting the record straight. [/OLD ARGUMENT] |
|||
__________________
280 days...... |
9 Oct 2010, 04:04 (Ref:2771770) | #754 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,595
|
Well....this year, RSR came VERY close to matching JLOC's (or who whoever ran under the banner name) pitiful 2009 performance....
|
|
__________________
On a mission to get back into following GT racing series again. |
9 Oct 2010, 04:18 (Ref:2771774) | #755 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Far from it!
L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
9 Oct 2010, 05:02 (Ref:2771782) | #756 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 62
|
|||
__________________
Corvette Racing (ALMS), Larbre Competition (ILMC), Callaway Competition (ADAC GT Masters) But most of all, Flying Lizard Motorsports. |
9 Oct 2010, 09:02 (Ref:2771863) | #757 | |||
Team Crouton
1% Club
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 40,009
|
Quote:
Not really. The Jag was seriously poor yes, but the 2009 JLOC performamce was way beyond poor. Thankfully for them, they at least partially redressed the balance this year. As for Autocon - my impression was that they tried hard but were completely out of their depth. |
|||
__________________
280 days...... |
9 Oct 2010, 12:54 (Ref:2771953) | #758 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
The RSR Jag may go down as one of GT2's rare failures.
It's amazing considering that Porsche, Ferrari, Chevrolet, BMW, Aston Martin, Panoz and (to a certain extent) Doran-Ford and Spyker have all built cars capable of running at the front of various ACO-sanctioned events. |
||
|
9 Oct 2010, 14:04 (Ref:2771978) | #759 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
I'd wite off RSR if they were missing every other race but they've shown real commitment to both the ALMS and ILMC, expanded to two cars and have a decent driver line-up.
In a PLM interview it sounded as if RSR needed the winter to iron out known issues with the engine. |
|
|
9 Oct 2010, 14:19 (Ref:2771981) | #760 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Would be a disgrace if they don't let the wayyy more deserving Robertson Doran Fords to enter 24 hours next year, but instead give this pitiful team 2 entries (now that they have both up and running)... unless RSR enters the ILMC, then I guess there's no excuse to complain.
|
|
|
10 Oct 2010, 21:31 (Ref:2772792) | #761 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
But your info on the AMV8 is inaccurate. The engine in that car is based on the previous family AJV8 engine with port injection and while a very good engine, bears no resemblance to the AJ133 Direct Injection engine currently in production, entirely different beasts. Last edited by Jaguarman1; 10 Oct 2010 at 21:38. |
|||
|
12 Oct 2010, 20:04 (Ref:2773986) | #762 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 14
|
roberton team deserves the 24 hours of le mans entry... i think jaguar need to send his cars to PRODRIVE or scott riley for full support because they haved shown only poor results while they have all the support that a 5 stars team have , good drivers , testing sessions , brand support , 24 le mans race ( reability and issues and competition test ) more than 12 races to show , 2 factory cars... sorry but gentilossi need to retire of these team
|
|
|
13 Oct 2010, 08:50 (Ref:2774221) | #763 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
I'm sure RSR reads the board...
So I expect the find the criticism a bit harsh but we as sports car fans and the purist among us like to see Jag do well.
I think they'll be okay, they have tested some, they found some more speed in the car and are not that far off the pace. Another off season of changes and testing which are all planned anyway and maybe a change to a better tire might start to bare fruit. The engine woes seem to had been sorted until Petit, seems that's another back to the drawing broad issue, but I think they'll be fine in that area. They'll be ready to rock and we'll all be looking forward too it. |
||
|
14 Oct 2010, 04:02 (Ref:2774671) | #764 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,595
|
I hope you're right...
|
|
__________________
On a mission to get back into following GT racing series again. |
7 Nov 2010, 18:50 (Ref:2786572) | #765 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 33
|
||
|
7 Nov 2010, 18:54 (Ref:2786577) | #766 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
they said it lost power .. so engine or transmission?
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
7 Nov 2010, 22:00 (Ref:2786725) | #767 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
I've said it all along, I would love to see the Jaguar name up there being competitive again, but, unfortunately, it doesn't appear that the glory days are going to be repeated. They are wasting their time and money on this thing. It should have been in a reasonably competitive state, well before now, but is just an embarrassment to the once great Jaguar name. I would have thought that Jag themselves would have pulled the pin on whatever funding they are providing and got out of this sooner.
|
||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
8 Nov 2010, 09:01 (Ref:2786867) | #768 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,103
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8 Nov 2010, 10:52 (Ref:2786936) | #769 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
People keep telling me racing is irrelevant to brand image
|
||
|
8 Nov 2010, 13:27 (Ref:2787020) | #770 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 141
|
very, very disappointed!
|
||
__________________
GO JAGUAR GO |
8 Nov 2010, 15:26 (Ref:2787077) | #771 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,595
|
Yeah, considering that the GT2 version of the Lamborghini is almost completely untested, but is finishing races, this just makes RSR and Jaguar look even worse.
|
|
__________________
On a mission to get back into following GT racing series again. |
8 Nov 2010, 15:30 (Ref:2787080) | #772 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Someone needs to put this program out of it's misery, or give it to a team that can get the job done.
|
||
|
8 Nov 2010, 15:35 (Ref:2787084) | #773 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,595
|
^ I'm thinking the latter. However, this is a several year deal, as widely reported. How much worse will it get before the car gets better, I wonder?
|
|
__________________
On a mission to get back into following GT racing series again. |
28 Nov 2010, 11:16 (Ref:2796718) | #774 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 141
|
news?! In my opinion, Jaguar has officially participate! You can no longer accept these humiliations on track
|
||
__________________
GO JAGUAR GO |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LMS GT2 vs FIA GT2 who is stronger ? | Subaru_WRX_STi | Sportscar & GT Racing | 40 | 19 Oct 2008 16:31 |
Ferrari F2008 launch tomorrow. Launch season begins! | Knowlesy | Formula One | 110 | 7 Feb 2008 14:13 |
Jaguar launch | Glen | Formula One | 18 | 23 Jan 2003 11:34 |
Jaguar e-launch | Asp | Formula One | 13 | 21 Jan 2003 20:48 |