|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Aug 2014, 00:09 (Ref:3445563) | #76 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 740
|
Quote:
Hmm, that would be an interesting track to think about. However, I sense that attendance would struggle at such a venue. To be honest, I can't remember the last time a major sports car racing series has run at Magny-Cours. Perhaps FIA GT3 several years ago? Last edited by Nick Woodbury; 20 Aug 2014 at 00:29. |
|||
|
20 Aug 2014, 07:40 (Ref:3445615) | #77 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
BES 2011
|
|
|
20 Aug 2014, 11:08 (Ref:3445652) | #78 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 239
|
I would like to see one additional race in Europe (August) and one additional race in North America. Right now, it feels like, out of sight, out of mind. Hard to build WEC series when there is such a huge break after Le Mans - all momentum is lost.
In Europe, would like to see the race at Monza, Imola or A-1 ring. In North America, Montreal would be a possibility. Strong history of supporting Motorsport. Fantastic location - walk-able to the circuit from the city center. Great city - nice potential road trip for fans. Could easily convince my wife to attend that venue. Based on the attendance at COTA this year, if it's weak, would moved to a circuit that has a history of a large fan base - Road America or Mid-Ohio. Last edited by Brake dust; 20 Aug 2014 at 11:14. |
|
|
20 Aug 2014, 18:58 (Ref:3445779) | #79 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Quote:
Heck, historically they have enough trouble attracting people to F1 at Catalonia; I'm sure Alonso saved that GP. Four wheels is two too many (and I don't fault that mentality)...... I know we've been over it several times, but it seems such a pity that we're talking about 3 North American WEC venues and they are the Texas car park, Indianapolis' former car park and Montreal. Although I can find little fault with the latter, in a land with Road America, Laguna Seca, Sebring, Road Atlanta and Watkins Glen, that really is shameful. |
|||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
20 Aug 2014, 19:11 (Ref:3445786) | #80 | |||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
And by 2009 the works teams and Genes had gone Quote:
Anyway at least with Indy and GV you get a sense that you are actually in America, when I look at Cota from TV it might just well be the parking lots of Turkey, who can tell the difference. |
|||
|
20 Aug 2014, 19:13 (Ref:3445788) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
I don't disagree with you there, there are few venues that wouldn't be an improvement!
|
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
20 Aug 2014, 19:14 (Ref:3445789) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 19:16 (Ref:3445790) | #83 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 19:16 (Ref:3445791) | #84 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
He is. Next competition: guess the year and driver!
|
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
20 Aug 2014, 19:19 (Ref:3445793) | #85 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 19:21 (Ref:3445794) | #86 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Well done. You win a cookie. To collect in person at the N24 next year.
Apologies for the detour, back to the topic... |
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
20 Aug 2014, 19:50 (Ref:3445802) | #87 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,905
|
The WEC tracks all seem more complicated than Indy. Sure Indy 500 and all that, but the roval really reminds me of a slightly larger, parking lot auto cross that happens to tie into the local short track back straight. I would respond with something along the lines of NA having greater historically significant tracks, but then I think - Indy. Even so, there are tracks in NA that have significantly (I believe buttload is the technically accurate term) more character than Indy. I'd be curious to see if participants actually enjoy racing the layout. Take the name out and see how decent the track is. I can't imagine it would garner much praise.
|
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 19:53 (Ref:3445804) | #88 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,596
|
Quote:
If it has history, its ok to race there. Cant race at cota, bahrain, fuji, shanghai because theyre not historic enough. Or they have too much tarmac run off etc. Well you drop those races and who will take their place? Its just a fantasy to believe there are so many other "real" tracks/venues willing to put up enough money to host the wec. Its a two way street. People should think about that. Whats it take to host a wec race? You cant just go anywhere. |
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 20:10 (Ref:3445807) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,483
|
Quote:
Saddest thing is the end of this development is nowhere in sight. |
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 20:17 (Ref:3445809) | #90 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
The track doesn't have to be historic to be on WEC calendar (although in some cases a la Sebring etc it is justified) - but it doesn't always have to be up to F1 standards either when we know these cars are ratified for Grade 2. By practising this they are limiting themselves to corner for no reason. There are other options, many many other options, just buried under the rock. Of 18 races this year on the ACO calendars, only two are not Grade 1 (Inje and LM - for obvious reasons) But as I've said before, with North America in particular I believe also it's the lack of European styled big indoor garages and VIP facilities that really keeps them out. Anyway it all comes down to my personal preferences of course - and with North America in particular it's annoying to just ignore the fabulous circuits, best in the world, and go to the boring ones. And yes I believe quite few of them would have the capability to host this events The other thing with choosing the venues is the marketing point of view, but we've gone into that before so let's not bore ourselves with that Last edited by Deleted; 20 Aug 2014 at 20:23. |
||
|
20 Aug 2014, 20:21 (Ref:3445811) | #91 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,596
|
Of course not. "Safety first". Gravel traps arent doing anything in their opinion. Pushing back fences, barriers, adding pavement, access roads and all that are measures the governing bodies have taken for their aim at being safer. Maybe there are other ways to go about it, but thats not the direction theyre taking. Things change, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse.
|
|
|
21 Aug 2014, 00:09 (Ref:3445852) | #93 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
VIR wasn't trying to please ACO or seeking Grade One credentials, and so daf as I know, none of the people who are quoted have actually raced or maybe even driven on the new track.
Not saying it is not good, just that this is a much a promo piece as anything else. Personally, I expect VIR to be a better track with a little added width and no gravel traps. but I will wait until I see a race their to make a judgment. Alos, if VIR was trying for a major upgrade, maybe to attract WEC someday, they owners might have had to sacrifice a little character and add some gravel traps. I sincerely hope Road Am can find a middle way. |
|
|
22 Aug 2014, 17:17 (Ref:3446297) | #94 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
http://www.speedcafe.com/2014/08/21/...-ten-coverage/
Quote:
|
||
|
22 Aug 2014, 17:21 (Ref:3446300) | #95 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
I'm sure we've been through this before, but the series is like 3 years old, extra rounds mean extra money and doing all that too quickly will just kill the series. Stability is more important than expansion is it not?
|
||
|
22 Aug 2014, 17:35 (Ref:3446303) | #96 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
Yes every year they say the same thing about stability and making the existing events get foothold in the sportscar world, but seriously for how many years can you say that the same thing for Shanghai 6 Hours or whatever when clearly sportscar fans still see them as "just championship rounds". And it's not like the current schedule is trouble free either or have we forgotten the sea freight logistics / cost saving difficulties? Btw technically it's 5th year if you count the ILMC. Anyway Porsche buying Kyalami brought hope, but it's probably just for their testing. Just to make it clear - there are FAR more international circuits in the world that I love than hate, it's just that they've been picked this way Last edited by Deleted; 22 Aug 2014 at 17:40. |
||
|
22 Aug 2014, 17:45 (Ref:3446306) | #97 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
Quote:
a) I don't count the ILMC b) Yes, it's going to be the same, I'm sure the teams want that, they know what they're getting into, they know the costs etc. It's still early days for the series and we can see they're looking into extra rounds (Montreal). I'm sure that'll start to happen and we'll see the calender grow. The 6 limits are there for TV purposes and you can say that's silly but it;s better than having distances and then suddenly having to change when a company comes in wanting to air the whole thing etc. It's early days relatively speaking and given a bit of time the series is sure to expand |
|||
|
22 Aug 2014, 18:20 (Ref:3446316) | #98 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
It's just that I don't want to be served the same exact dishes every week. Even if we got ten 6 hour races at Road America every single year it would get tiring after few seasons
Also, it doesn't need to be distances necessarily, I mean I've gone on record before that I would love 3-4 hour regular races. There's no real need to endure the 6 hours every race - we know these are sprint races nowadays and the equipment will last - and old WSC was famous for the 500km ish distance ie roughly that timeframe in it's glory years. And since we talk about TV here, surely shorter races would also please them? But above all you need a standout races besides just LM, something that stands out - and if we really can't have established events like Sebring or Petit nor can we go anywhere outside Grade 1 tracks for no real reason, at least make one of the events last 12 hours. Or 10. Now would something like Fuji 12 Hours really make it special? I mean quite literally that would just mean 6 extra hours to the current format on a track not universally loved anyways. No not really, but it would still be different and 12 hours actually does test the car. You could improve the spectacle by inviting other classes in too, like AsLMS did (and only did, foolishly) with Super GT's GT300 class last year at Fuji. Or heck just integrate the Asian Le Mans Series for that one race, as ILMC did. Or ELMS if we we're talking of European event, eliminate filler classes if grid capacity is too high. You could also start giving automatic invites for the class winners as PLM used to do. Sky is the limit - unless it's the FIA burearchy that is preventing all these different things out of total standardization that ILMC and previous series practiced. Sportscar racing has always been about the events, not series. Nobody really remembers who won the championships in year X but everyone remembers the big events with factories and heritage. No don't get me wrong "regular" events like Spa 6 Hours or Mosport Grand Prix are still important parts of the season for various reasons but you need the big events. With LMP1 in particular there quite literally is nowhere else to go so this is the only place to showcase the cars, and when you only have seven regular rounds run "wherever" and start of the season used as LM-prep anyway it just kinda underlines the whole thing and centers everything around Le Mans... which is obviously logical as Le Mans means more than all of world's other sportscar races put together but when everything is so focused on just one event it just builds bigger gap between LM and all the rest. And that's how it feels to common folk too, there's Le Mans and "the other rounds". Last edited by Deleted; 22 Aug 2014 at 18:30. |
|
|
22 Aug 2014, 19:31 (Ref:3446333) | #99 | ||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree that there can be one other "big event" but right now, it's not necessary. Stability is necessary right now and possible expansion can be considered. The standardization isn't a big deal...every championship in the world has a standard distance outside of its big events. I forgot to add this. Le Mans is bigger than the championship itself, that's true. But Le Mans is also 80+ years older. The WEC will become more important/prestigious as it gets older. Last edited by Salamus; 22 Aug 2014 at 19:46. |
||||||
__________________
Roger Penske to Paul Tracy about the Indy 500: "We both won it but I've got the trophy" |
22 Aug 2014, 20:32 (Ref:3446344) | #100 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,483
|
Quote:
If the WEC had one or two other big events, the lure for entrants would be bigger, now it's all and only about Le Mans, keeping everything the same (or even converting to a 'winter schedule' without changing anything else) will maintain that situation. Sportscars are not F1 - somebody should have told Neveu and you would have just thought that FIA's Petit General would know that like nobody else... |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMSA USCC in 2016 and 2017 | Bob Riebe | North American Racing | 5472 | 29 Sep 2017 11:27 |
2015 Silly Season | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 2559 | 20 Jun 2016 03:31 |
2015 IndyCar schedule | NaBUru38 | Indycar Series | 330 | 19 Jun 2015 12:11 |
2015 Dakar Rally | NaBUru38 | Rallying & Rallycross | 16 | 28 Jul 2014 14:47 |
Melbourne has contract to 2015 (?) | Marbot | Formula One | 23 | 18 Jun 2008 13:09 |