|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 Dec 2010, 03:26 (Ref:2808012) | #76 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Hey Felix ..... Merry Christmas to you and your family too .... Hope you all have a great festive happy time .
I would comment on your eng.drg. ..... but Im not clever enough . I just fix **** !!! ..... but I do it good . |
||
|
24 Dec 2010, 05:29 (Ref:2808026) | #77 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 423
|
Andrew,
My grandfather immigrated from Poland in 1906 at the age of 16 and went on to become a finish carpenter (by American standards) and then went on to provide finished carpentry in alot of very fine homes in Chicago, where he settled. He was a very fine man. A man who admire very much. (I am 63 now). You are AWESOME, but I cannot understand, and not follow your logic. ( And get this: I am an engineer.) Please understand that I think that what you are doing is beyond wonderful, it is magic. At least that's how I describe it, even if I don't understand it, but think I kind of get it. You are awesome. And a fellow Pole. Merry Christmas. Pete Oh man, stabbing at keys before you see it. Last edited by pdxracefan; 24 Dec 2010 at 05:47. |
||
__________________
Tell the truth. It's easier to memorize. |
5 Feb 2011, 15:53 (Ref:2826197) | #78 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
New animations half rotate engine:
And in scale 1:1 350 ccm intake volume: http://www.new4stroke.com/halfrotatedxf.dxf Save file Regards Andrew |
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 22:02 (Ref:2827458) | #79 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
17 Feb 2011, 20:35 (Ref:2832938) | #80 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
"Twin Feliks"
Big air cooled Small air cooled star halfrotate And "Stephenson second" And story this inventions "step by step" Story half rotate engine Regards Andrew |
||
|
18 Feb 2011, 10:30 (Ref:2833208) | #81 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Save these PDF files on your computer and print. These are drawings of the 2-liter engine on a scale of 1: 1
http://www.new4stroke.com/section.pdf http://www.new4stroke.com/long.pdf Regards Andrew |
||
|
26 Feb 2011, 22:12 (Ref:2837309) | #82 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Good old poped and see what they are having a ...
And with the precision control valve, you can only dream.:tsk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_REQ1...eature=related Every cent given to the development of the "old" technology is turer wasted ... Andrew |
||
|
30 Mar 2011, 22:11 (Ref:2856104) | #83 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
The wind energy. Harrier is driven by the wind, the helicopter also...In order to receive a flow venturi nozzle which is in the engine Harier ( 200 KG / sec ), then you need only 6 meters in diameter and 25 length.... and 5 m / sec wind...
With the movement of 200 Kg / sec Harrier has a string of 10 000 KG.... Another way to go. The narrowest point is less Venturiego nozzle pressure. It's like found in the center of the lowlands of atmospheric ( weather ). This causes larger than hurricanes weather. Except that here we have a much shorter way from the boom to the lowlands.... Huricane flows from areas of high pressure to areas of low pressure. QUOTE (Greg Locock @ Mar 29 2011, 21:25) Step back from the equations, and think about what would happen if you put a disc with a hole in it up to the airflow. Now stretch the disc out along the axis of the hole. All the air in the disc bit will be still 'see' disc ahead of them, not the hole you'd like them to go for. A big wodge of stagnated air will build up ahead of the venturi. For the equations just use continuity and Bernouilli, for the lossless case./QUOTE In this reasoning, the disc does not have thickness. The reasoning for the classic windmill, to which all are used: flat disk, with virtually no thickness. Therefore, the classic windmill has a low efficiency, because this disc is not dispensed air mass and its speed is only such as wind. The venturi nozzle are two cones and a not insignificant thickness of 25 meters. And now this whole mass of air that is housed in a venturi nozzle is involved in the flow through it. It should be noted that the cones are of unequal length. Cone output is 30 % longer than the input... why? Well, because this is the output cone of doing it at low pressure in the narrowest point. With reduction in pressure, is involved the whole mass of air in which the output is a cone, that is, the average disk X 16m. Cone can not be shorter because they do not provide laminar flow, which is a prerequisite for good work Venturi nozzle. With disorders of movement ( for a short cone ) in action will take part, only a small mass of air, to lower pressure. The condition is llaminar flow, because the cone has to be quite so long. For that produces a significant vacuum in the narrowest point, causing fresh air to the input cone... Andrew |
||
|
30 Mar 2011, 22:16 (Ref:2856107) | #84 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
I fail to see why this topic falls under "Sportscar & GT Racing". Can the moderators please move this elsewhere on the forum?
|
|
|
31 Mar 2011, 03:24 (Ref:2856178) | #85 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 156
|
Because only Sportscar and GT racing types find this interesting.
|
||
|
31 Mar 2011, 12:02 (Ref:2856326) | #86 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
||
|
31 Mar 2011, 13:55 (Ref:2856368) | #87 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
1 Apr 2011, 10:21 (Ref:2856740) | #88 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
9 Apr 2011, 02:30 (Ref:2860743) | #89 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Animation showing how using venturi nozzle drives the gyroscope to the flight instruments. Historically, the aircraft was not an electric current...
But now, if we do the jets in the right size, we thus also powered electric generator... Even used a double Venturi nozzle, in order to increase the vacuum to best drive "turbine" Regards Andrew |
||
|
10 Apr 2011, 09:09 (Ref:2861164) | #90 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
So yes, I think it best to start with what everyone has long-standing knowledge and know how not to reinvent the wheel.
Ideally we'll see this in professional. http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/vacpro.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/fundament.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/index.php?page=vetheory#matcon http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/DesigSteam.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/a_ejectors.htm http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/vacpump.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/vacwater.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/superheaters.pdf http://www.croll.com/pr/pdf/noisecontrol.pdf I think that for the first time, that's enough. Greetings fromYoda Andrew |
||
|
12 Apr 2011, 21:10 (Ref:2862630) | #91 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
I still have some of the existing achievements Venturi Nozzle:
http://books.google.pl/books?id=RNTvti6Vmd...uri&f=false http://64.201.227.3/~sk/J-1_All_ProductBroch.pdf http://www.pdfio.com/k-214799.html http://www.nitech-vac.com/products/ejector...am_ejectors.htm I think that the next step will be to manufacture large quantities of electricity from wind, by the use of Venturi nozzles Andrew |
||
|
13 Apr 2011, 23:02 (Ref:2863079) | #92 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
16 Apr 2011, 20:52 (Ref:2864437) | #93 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Helicopter rotor blades without ???
Without blades http://www.dysonairmultiplier.com/ four animation. Perhaps,perhaps... Andrew |
||
|
18 Apr 2011, 10:02 (Ref:2865573) | #94 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
In Other Technical Forum :
Quote:
Andrew |
|||
|
20 Apr 2011, 21:06 (Ref:2867223) | #95 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
[quote name='gruntguru' post='4982321' date='Apr 20 2011, 01:11']Total power in the wind.
Power = 0.5 x Swept Area x Air Density x Velocity[sup]3[/sup] from http://www.reuk.co.uk/Calculation-of-Wind-Power.htm...[/quote]In the Wikipedia is a big mistake or inaccuracy Call it what you think. Now why is that: Kinetic Energy = Mass x 0.5 x Velocity2 It is certainly true. But when it comes to the calculated mass is no longer referred to as: Mass / sec (kg / s) = Velocity ( m / sec ) x Area ( m2 ) x Density (kg/m3 ) In my opinion, if we count the mass, we must indicate the volume of the cylinder, which is in addition to its surface and its length. Here, due to an error or a" shortcut calculations" assume that the length of the cylinder is equal to 1. But it is not always true mass depends also on the length of the cylinder, because they can be 50 meters. Of course, if you will take part in the formation of energy. Even in a new traditional windmill blade width can have two meter, and now the model is invalid. * But because the masses are Surface x L x Density. Always. Well, where we have L ? Regards Andrew By the way. What has to calculate the speed of her weight? |
||
|
20 Apr 2011, 21:21 (Ref:2867230) | #96 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
There ya go , a new green project for Jan Lammers & Racing for Holland ..... a windmill powered P1 chassis !!!
|
||
|
22 Apr 2011, 03:16 (Ref:2867927) | #97 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
Holidays are approaching, so we do spring cleaning. For sure we will use the vacuum cleaner. We can using such a vacuum cleaner to see how the underground windmill will run . Namely, you should close the pipe vacum cleaner is best without the caps to a small fan, for example, to cool the CPU, or a computer power supply. We will have a working model of an underground windmill...... The following picture shows the sports exhaust, which are built with a relatively long individual pipes from each cylinder. Their length L is crucial for their proper operation. Mass departing exhaust with a volume of such tubes will help the new portion of air intake into the cylinder, while the common valve opening. This mass is precisely calculated for the speed at which it will perform a so-called dynamic charge of the engine Just the energy contained in the exhaust of precision of the volume of the exhaust manifold vacuum in the cylinder does. Happy Easter to everybody ! Andrew |
||
|
29 Apr 2011, 17:08 (Ref:2871822) | #98 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
3 May 2011, 01:17 (Ref:2873265) | #99 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
6 May 2011, 10:15 (Ref:2875211) | #100 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 383
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differential | silente | Racing Technology | 6 | 11 Jun 2006 07:02 |
Qualifying differential | skidmark | Formula One | 7 | 29 Jun 2000 05:27 |