|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 May 2023, 14:54 (Ref:4157453) | #76 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,066
|
||
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
22 May 2023, 15:12 (Ref:4157456) | #77 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
Agreed, I wouldn’t want that at LM, or WEC, or IMSA, etc…
The N24 is ace. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
4 Jun 2023, 10:00 (Ref:4159634) | #78 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 176
|
New Safety Car procedure just got tested, using a debris cleaning as a pretext to launch it.
It took 26 minutes while the débris got swept after 2 minutes. So 24 minutes with half the cars in the pits. |
|
|
4 Jun 2023, 11:12 (Ref:4159651) | #79 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
Unlike IMSA then, who leave big parts or car and signs all over the track!
I wondered if they would test it. In previous years at test day they are extremely cautious with cautions and reds. Anything brings it out. Good bit of timing three - thanks. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
4 Jun 2023, 20:58 (Ref:4159871) | #80 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
So there was a practice of the procedure.
https://twitter.com/onlyendurance/st...325078529?s=61 How’d it go? Worst thing ever? |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
4 Jun 2023, 21:48 (Ref:4159883) | #81 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 176
|
They did it again in the afternoon it seems. It lasted... 37 minutes. It is still time to ditch it, it won't be the first time the ACO changes its mind without telling anybody if you see what I mean.
|
|
|
4 Jun 2023, 22:11 (Ref:4159885) | #82 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,166
|
This new procedure is catastrophic, too long and unintelligible. They should replace it with a code 80 on the whole track for the intervention of vehicules followed by a slow-zone. And if vehicles have to take the track again, code 80 again.
Nobody would lose time or get penalised. |
||
__________________
BoP = egalitarianism |
5 Jun 2023, 02:25 (Ref:4159908) | #83 | ||||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
In the morning slow zones and the full SC procedure was tested.
I wasn’t doing the live timing screens, but DSC was: Quote:
Then there was another chance in the afternoon Quote:
So very similar to IMSA. At Laguna Seca a FCY procedure was taking 18 to 19 minutes, but that is a short track. At Sebring, a longer track, it was a litle under 24 minutes. It does vary a little. In the morning there were also a couple of reds, but that is not that unusual for practice. Last edited by Adam43; 5 Jun 2023 at 02:47. |
||||
__________________
Brum brum |
5 Jun 2023, 08:09 (Ref:4159940) | #84 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,386
|
What takes a long while is when they decide to replace a damaged rail and its poles… The procedure is the Chef de poste calls the race direction, then endless discussions, then they call for new components to be fitted, then they start working… If dicusssions are shorted, the first part takes at least 30 minutes. Or when possible/amissible, they put a YF on the rail…
|
||
|
5 Jun 2023, 08:13 (Ref:4159942) | #85 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,476
|
If they are doing barrier repairs somewhere on circuit and can do all the wave by, class rearranging etc on another part of the circuit then time loss can be reduced. If they wait for all repairs and then do the theatrics, it's more dead time.
|
||
|
6 Jun 2023, 02:10 (Ref:4160148) | #86 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
Yes, barrier repairs can take a long time. It’s been a fan moan for a long time.
Best thing they can do there is practice in the off season. In the dark. Get good and efficient at it. That will also add to the confidence that it is done well. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Jun 2023, 02:20 (Ref:4160150) | #87 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
I’ve been trying to look at the timing of the two practice runnings today, but I can’t find the timing replays. I didn’t record them live so don’t have them.
I do have the timing of when the first and last car to crossed the line in the safety car period, but I don’t have the actual time it was called. In the first session the first car to cross the line after the safety car came out was #16 1h26m57s into the first session and the last was #55. #55 crossed the line 20m28s after. DSC timing this at 24minutes. S365 say 26 minutes. For second one it was #23 first crossing the line at 1:23:48 into the second session and then #93 crossing the line last before it was withdrawn 26m38s after. DSC has this at a “shade over 30 minutes”, Paul Truswell said 32 minutes on the coverage and that included sorting out the problem. S365 say 37 minutes. Could be the case as there will be time before and after these cars crossed the line that will be under safety car. Anyway, no real info here, but it is an appeal to say does anyone have the data of when the safety car was actually out (IMSA gives good data on this), or did anyone record the timing (say on Timing 71?). Last edited by Adam43; 6 Jun 2023 at 10:07. Reason: Added links to source. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Jun 2023, 02:40 (Ref:4160151) | #88 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
I thought it would be interesting to post the procedure. Here is an article from when it was announced:
https://en.endurance-info.com/auto/a...letely-revised And these are the regs: https://assets.lemans.org/explorer/p...ons.pdf#page86 A summary of this is shown by listing the articles in order. 14.6.1 Start of the procedure 14.6.2 When you are allowed to overtake 14.6.3 SC may use the pit lane if needed 14.6.4 Merging behind one SC 14.6.5 Pass around 14.6.6 Drop back (the classes LMP2 and then GTE) 14.6.7 End of main SC procedure. The procedure is different in the last 60 minutes of the race: 14.7.1 Deployment of SC in last 60 minutes 14.6.4, 5 , 6 and 7 won’t apply. Two things I couldn’t find: 1. How is garage 56 treated? 2. Do they do anything different if there is a safety car just after we’ve had one (IMSA does this - they have SC light if it is less than 30 minutes (IIRC) after the last one). |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Jun 2023, 06:04 (Ref:4160159) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,476
|
What happens if the overall leader is not a Hypercar when the SC is called? Do we end up with an IMSA-style joke situation where the leader on the road is told they aren't allowed to be the leader any more and they get shuffled back to their group? I mean, that would be really embarrassing, right?
|
||
|
6 Jun 2023, 07:37 (Ref:4160173) | #90 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,386
|
Quote:
All this will be different during the last 60 minutes of the race, of course I wonder how teams, drivers, marshals, commentators can cope with so many rules. |
|||
|
6 Jun 2023, 08:01 (Ref:4160177) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,386
|
Imagine they want to train all the marshalls, all the drivers and team principals to the described procedures it will take a month! May be more.
|
||
|
6 Jun 2023, 17:51 (Ref:4160264) | #92 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,624
|
Quote:
I mean we can talk and bemoan this new way of doing things, but with any luck we won't have to find out if it works! Race is going green the whole way |
|||
|
6 Jun 2023, 18:47 (Ref:4160274) | #93 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,386
|
Agreed. Either green all time, seems impossible to me, or FCY / code 80 sometimes but no SC. When the teams will have to manage situations like pitlane entry closed/exit open then vice versa, they gonna have a moment! Place au sport as they say in Surrey! Or is it Yorkshire…
|
||
|
10 Jun 2023, 17:04 (Ref:4161662) | #94 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
First SC was 35:15 long. Hard to judge anything as it was early on.
Re-ordering the class went well. Barrier repair probably meant it was that long whatever. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Jun 2023, 18:06 (Ref:4161788) | #95 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
They surely could have slow zone the mulsanne in the first hour rather than 30 misn plus safety car |
|||
|
10 Jun 2023, 18:44 (Ref:4161888) | #96 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
Second SC was a tedious 1:25:29.
I felt it was the right call to start it. And the length wasn't to do with the procedure. That added some minutes, but was done fairly quick. would have been nice if it was one lap less. But it was very long. Just didn't want them to race in those conditions? I don't think there were any track repairs to do. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Jun 2023, 19:42 (Ref:4161995) | #97 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,386
|
May be they had to call individually each Pug shareholder to take a picture? "Total" waste of time.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2023, 23:02 (Ref:4162272) | #98 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
They had a 20 odd second lead. Do it this way it will be 1 second or so. If they didn't then the Toyota ended up quite a bit behind and the next SC, I think. So 20s even became 1s or 1 minute! Which is worse. I'm not saying, but it is debatable.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Jun 2023, 23:22 (Ref:4162287) | #99 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,191
|
Third SC summary
00:16:57 SC starts 00:53:34 Incident clear - prepare for merging 00:53:46 Pit Land Closed 00:54:20 Eduardo on the radio - "let's do the merge" - this wasn't on the timing screen 00:59.24 Prepare for Pass Around 00:59:34 Start Pass Around* 01:07:32 LMP2 prepare for drop back 01:07:47 LMP2 Start Drop back 01:09:51 Car 24 start drop back 01:10:32 GTE prepare for drop back 01:10:39 GTE Start Drop back 01:16:15 Car 80 let the cars pass before MP30 01:16:21 SC in this lap 01:16:47 car 80 to RHS on the run off 01:17:30 GREEN FLAG 01:18:36 Team manager car 80 to the race director immediately. 36:37 to sort the incident 23:56 to do the procedure. *The procedure could have been faster, but 77 (I think that was the number Eduardo said) was tardy getting round. Grrrr. And we had the annoying #80 LMP2 breaking down in the middle of the procedure, but they didn't care and still started anyway. Eduardo told him to pull over! |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
11 Jun 2023, 00:25 (Ref:4162360) | #100 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,301
|
Far too much of this race is being lost to the terrible new safety car procedures. These days all the cars are GPS tracked with full telemetry. I see absolutely no reason why the zones with incidents can't be managed with a set speed limit and no overtaking, and then green conditions the rest of the way round. The only reasonable exception I can see to this is an incident so severe that emergency service access to cars trackside requires further intervention.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Doctors to overhaul car wreck rescue techniques amid new evidence | TWRv12 | Marshals Forum | 6 | 9 Aug 2022 14:59 |
When is a Safety Car not a Safety Car???? | trogladyte | Australasian Touring Cars. | 24 | 4 Apr 2009 01:31 |
F1 Safety Car Regs Overhaul | mark_l | Formula One | 23 | 19 Oct 2006 18:39 |
Tipping Contest Overhaul? | Hazza | Bike Racing | 14 | 25 Jun 2006 12:23 |
Rules overhaul by TEGA... | vortexo | Australasian Touring Cars. | 52 | 30 May 2004 10:15 |