Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Oct 2005, 09:18 (Ref:1440418)   #76
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBoehm
My point K-B is I dont really understand why they were used in the first place. My discontent with F1 is that Technoligy plays to big of a role. So my point is with tyre warmers and other driver aids, it might be more fun to watch robots drive.
But that's one of the intrinsic elements of F1 - technological progression and evolution. wing mirrors, disc brakes, slicks, wings, ground-effect, semi-auto gearboxes, anti-lock brakes, diffusers, adaptive steering, traction control, pneumatic valves all originated in F1 [OK, someone's gonna correct me on one of these and say it was invented by Volvo ].

The FIA have [correctly] policed the situation in terms of safety, competition and costs. However we do need to allow a platform in motorsport for technical progression. If you look around, its prohibited from almost all other racing series [GP2, F-Renault, Champcars, A1GP etc...]

Provided the FIA stick to the ethos that the driver remains the most significant factor in an F1 package [i.e. prohibiting devices that assume control of the car i.e. adaptive steering, traction control etc...], then all will be well. The problem is that IMO, they're not doing that effectively enough right now.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 09:21 (Ref:1440420)   #77
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Banning tyre warmers wouldn't change anything, the teams would just find some other way to heat the tyres. If you want to see driver skill as the major factor in how a car performs, banning all electronic aids and traction control wouild be a good start. Makes GP2 good.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 09:30 (Ref:1440432)   #78
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan89
Banning tyre warmers wouldn't change anything, the teams would just find some other way to heat the tyres. If you want to see driver skill as the major factor in how a car performs, banning all electronic aids and traction control wouild be a good start. Makes GP2 good.
You're absolutely right. People are confusing tyre warmers with driver aids. Tyre warmers, present or absent, have little effect on the show. Electronic aids and aerodynamic devices that restrict overtaking do.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 09:34 (Ref:1440438)   #79
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
These add-on aero parts that have appeared since last season have really spoiled the racing. Ban them and overtaking should be at least semi-possible rather than close to impossible.

Having cold tyres at the start of a race would be dangerous, would it not? Look at how everyone was running wide at Japan when there was no grip. If 130R didn't have a tarmac run-off area, Christian Klien would have had a big accident.

Getting rid of tyre warmers could make the opening laps dangerous, and if teams want to pay for them, let them.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 09:39 (Ref:1440443)   #80
SpawnyWhippet
Veteran
 
SpawnyWhippet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Singapore
Posts: 730
SpawnyWhippet has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Then the drivers need to go slower till they warm up their tyres. They are the ones in control of the thing, thats part of the skill. Drivers who are better at judging cold tyre grip will be at an advantage.
SpawnyWhippet is offline  
__________________
"Centipede: An ant built to government specifications"
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 12:01 (Ref:1440531)   #81
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,195
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan89
These add-on aero parts that have appeared since last season have really spoiled the racing. Ban them and overtaking should be at least semi-possible rather than close to impossible.

Having cold tyres at the start of a race would be dangerous, would it not? Look at how everyone was running wide at Japan when there was no grip. If 130R didn't have a tarmac run-off area, Christian Klien would have had a big accident.

Getting rid of tyre warmers could make the opening laps dangerous, and if teams want to pay for them, let them.
If a driver hasn't the maximum grip, he will have to slow down. It should be up to him to determine his speed.
Pingguest is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 12:02 (Ref:1440533)   #82
JohnSSC
Veteran
 
JohnSSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Slovenia
Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,073
JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!
I wonder if when synchromesh gearboxes were first used if they were decried for taking away "driver skill?"

In some ways these are indeed "easier" cars to drive - at least in the sense that they don't have a tendency to kill you (literally) when you make a mistake. "Driver aids" or not, today's F1 pilot has to be able to react to changing conditions while going at average speeds that are essentially ridiculous compared to what the previous generations of cars have been capable of. However, the complexity, adjustability and just the overall raw speed requires a huge amount of driver skill. Are the skillsets needed somewhat different than 40 years ago? Yes. But that does not make these drivers "lacking" by comparison.

Now if we could just talk the FIA into requiring "crash" boxes...
JohnSSC is offline  
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton.
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 14:07 (Ref:1440610)   #83
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
20 years ago, there's was nothing to stop you from 'buzzing' an engine and ending your race there and then. A fairly simple piece of engine management code now makes this impossible. Is that a driver aid ? Should we say remove that piece of code because its up to the driver and his skill to ensure an engine's not over-revved ? Its like telling people to leave their cellphones at home because in years gone by you had to go home or to public call box to make a telephone call if you were out.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Oct 2005, 14:31 (Ref:1440627)   #84
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
The problem with driver aids is that they give the general viewing public the illusion that F1 cars are easy to drive.

ABS,just stand on the pedal at a predetermined braking point and let the system do it all for you.

TC,just floor the throttle mid corner and away you go,no wheelspin or power oversteer,just a nice smooth exit and a splutter from your motor.

Semi-auto gearboxes,what could be easier,well fully-auto of course.

Of course it's not that easy is it,but then i'm under no illusion.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Oct 2005, 18:40 (Ref:1441438)   #85
EERO
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
EERO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
United States
Massachusetts
Posts: 5,306
EERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridEERO should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyboy
20 years ago, there's was nothing to stop you from 'buzzing' an engine and ending your race there and then. A fairly simple piece of engine management code now makes this impossible. Is that a driver aid ? Should we say remove that piece of code because its up to the driver and his skill to ensure an engine's not over-revved ? Its like telling people to leave their cellphones at home because in years gone by you had to go home or to public call box to make a telephone call if you were out.
I think the sense of the arguement is that if you give a driver more things to consider that tax his skill, the likelyhood of a misstep is possible. Not a catastrophic misstep, but someting like a muffed downshift that allows a following driver who shifted cleanly to gain momentum and pull off a clean pass.
EERO is offline  
__________________
Go Tribe!!!!
Quote
Old 24 Oct 2005, 01:45 (Ref:1441699)   #86
JohnSSC
Veteran
 
JohnSSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Slovenia
Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,073
JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!
On the converse of that, EERO, think of all the things now that a driver must consider that he/she did not have to 20 or more years ago:

Tire choice
Tire pressures
Engine mapping
Aero settings
Etc

Further, with all of the electronic recording devices, a driver really can't fool the engineers with lurid stories of opposite lock and potentially deflating tyres (I am equal opportunity: time for the UK spelling) to explain a visit to the tire wall. "I was flat out in Eau Rouge." is now an easily verifiable statement.

My point here is that there is now much more pressure on the driver to perform: "Here. We are giving you this car that can do X,Y & Z. We can monitor the data to see if you utilize it or if you bend it, what you were really doing (as opposed to what you told us)."
JohnSSC is offline  
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton.
Quote
Old 24 Oct 2005, 16:18 (Ref:1442302)   #87
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
OFFICIAL: The teams have voted to keep tyre warmers
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Oct 2005, 17:20 (Ref:1442357)   #88
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,195
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kicking-back
OFFICIAL: The teams have voted to keep tyre warmers
That's a shame.
Pingguest is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Oct 2005, 17:35 (Ref:1442366)   #89
Kirk
Veteran
 
Kirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
Kirk has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnSSC
On the converse of that, EERO, think of all the things now that a driver must consider that he/she did not have to 20 or more years ago:

Tire choice
Tire pressures
Engine mapping
Aero settings
Etc

Further, with all of the electronic recording devices, a driver really can't fool the engineers with lurid stories of opposite lock and potentially deflating tyres (I am equal opportunity: time for the UK spelling) to explain a visit to the tire wall. "I was flat out in Eau Rouge." is now an easily verifiable statement.

My point here is that there is now much more pressure on the driver to perform: "Here. We are giving you this car that can do X,Y & Z. We can monitor the data to see if you utilize it or if you bend it, what you were really doing (as opposed to what you told us)."
Some good points there John. I bet there was many an outrageous yarn told back in the "good ol' days". The drivers are under more pressure than ever to perform. All the gadgets allow the driver and engineer alike to remain on the same page and virtually every situation is monitored and measured in the modern F1.

As for the decision to keep tyre warmers, I think it's a good idea ... and perhaps this can be revisited when (or is it, if?) slicks are reintroduced.
Kirk is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Oct 2005, 19:03 (Ref:1442458)   #90
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pingguest
That's a shame.
No its not.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ferrari tyre warmers causing controversy... Sodemo Formula One 86 29 Jun 2005 17:54
Why no tire warmers? Tailwind ChampCar World Series 24 4 Jun 2003 18:19
Tyre 'Pick-up' removers are tyre-warmers? Sparky Racing Technology 2 31 May 2000 03:46
Why ban tyre warmers? Super Tourer Touring Car Racing 3 24 May 2000 12:02
Tyre warmers debate ganda123 Touring Car Racing 6 15 Apr 2000 21:07


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.