|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Feb 2012, 06:38 (Ref:3022014) | #76 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
|
you can clearly see that both the Mp4/26 and mp4/27 have a nose that is lower than the top of the front tires as it passes them, while most other teams don't. Red Bull is included as a 2011 car that had a nose higher than the front tires, so I would either suspect a step or going with a McLaren like lower nose
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 07:06 (Ref:3022016) | #77 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 505
|
My sources tell me the new RedBull will not have the ugly nose that you have seen in all the cars but the McLaren.
|
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 07:14 (Ref:3022018) | #78 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
Quote:
Or indeed visa versa if RB and McL don't do as well? I agree the Lotus is the best looking of the new style nose jobs so far. |
|||
__________________
Madness is a normal condition interupted only by spells of sanity. |
6 Feb 2012, 09:08 (Ref:3022047) | #79 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
look at Williams walrus-nose a few years back. though it didn't take them long to figure out it didn't work, the season was nearly over when they finally got round to changing it effectively. |
|||
__________________
Heaven is a checkered flag. |
6 Feb 2012, 09:24 (Ref:3022049) | #80 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,565
|
To redesign the front of is not the work of a moment as the ugly noses have a much higher chassis that that of the McLaren.
To lower the nose of the car like the McLaren would basically need a new chassis and a new aero concept. It will be interesting to see who will be right or has the best compromise. |
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 11:29 (Ref:3022100) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,413
|
|||
|
6 Feb 2012, 12:30 (Ref:3022116) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Great to see the Sauber inundated with sponsers again !
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
6 Feb 2012, 13:09 (Ref:3022133) | #83 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 753
|
Quote:
Stepped... |
|||
__________________
A SQL query walks into a bar and sees two tables. He walks up to them and says 'Can I join you?' |
6 Feb 2012, 13:16 (Ref:3022137) | #84 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:19 (Ref:3022139) | #85 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,013
|
My money is on Newey being right and a certain other team being "out of step"...
... pardon the pun. |
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:28 (Ref:3022149) | #86 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
It seems that McLaren are still alone with the non-stepped nose, and because the chassis they have is already lower than any other chassis at the point where the regulations say the height of the nose should drop to meet the new regulation, it will not be able to incorporate the stepped-nose into its design, because it cannot change the tub, which is homologated.
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:37 (Ref:3022155) | #87 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:41 (Ref:3022159) | #88 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,062
|
Quote:
I wonder if this is a direct result of the regulations stating max heights at different locations, or whether this is simply a case of allowing enough room for the driver's feet and the safety structure that surrounds them? If the latter, would smaller driver = longer drooped nose? |
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:44 (Ref:3022161) | #89 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Maybe, maybe not.
But it's obvious that there are 2 schools of thought here. McLaren think that the nose should not have a step in it, whereas everyone else thinks that it should. Maybe if either Marussia or HRT have a non-stepped nose, McLaren can breathe a sigh of relief? |
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:50 (Ref:3022162) | #90 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:52 (Ref:3022163) | #91 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Madness is a normal condition interupted only by spells of sanity. |
6 Feb 2012, 13:55 (Ref:3022165) | #92 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 13:58 (Ref:3022166) | #93 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
The tubs are homologated at the start of the season, so McLaren could have built a tub that allowed a stepped nose, as indeed so could all the other teams have built a tub that doesn't need a stepped nose. You cannot then change the tub at any point during the same season.
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:03 (Ref:3022171) | #94 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:10 (Ref:3022174) | #95 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
And maybe that will be their undoing. I hope not because we need a team that can take it to Red Bull consistently throughout the season.
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:17 (Ref:3022177) | #96 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 867
|
Ferrari v Mclaren - Side on
|
||
__________________
CG |
6 Feb 2012, 14:22 (Ref:3022180) | #97 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
The McLaren's is well below the maximum height allowed.
It's the height of the chassis/tub just behind the front tyres that is most telling. |
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:27 (Ref:3022182) | #98 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,909
|
see i see it the other way around, every other team has had to sacrifice their design philosiphy where as mclaren have kept theirs that has proven successful
|
||
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:32 (Ref:3022183) | #99 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
If that were the case, we would have seen at least one other team take a step in that direction. None have, which tells me that the majority still think that their philosophy is the correct one. We shall soon see.
|
|
|
6 Feb 2012, 14:36 (Ref:3022184) | #100 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 867
|
I adjusted the image ^
|
||
__________________
CG |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GP 2012 General chat (split from volunteering thread) | Charlyw001 | Marshals Forum | 73 | 29 Oct 2011 08:13 |
The 2010 F1 Car Launch Thread | Marbot | Formula One | 554 | 25 Feb 2010 19:00 |
Britek car at launch | bathurst77 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 7 | 22 Feb 2005 00:16 |
Renault launch the new car! | ralf fan | Formula One | 27 | 1 Feb 2004 07:44 |
Car Launch Dates! | F1FansClub | Formula One | 4 | 7 Jan 2001 11:31 |