|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Jun 2014, 01:42 (Ref:3417276) | #76 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,199
|
Quote:
Richard |
||
|
9 Jun 2014, 02:51 (Ref:3417291) | #77 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Jun 2014, 01:35 (Ref:3417919) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 914
|
|||
|
10 Jun 2014, 02:29 (Ref:3417928) | #79 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
As I heard it the money for the racing program was budgeted in under promotion and the argument was that cutting it would hurt sales which would be counterproductive.
|
|
|
10 Jun 2014, 06:07 (Ref:3417971) | #80 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jun 2014, 12:06 (Ref:3418096) | #81 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 203
|
Quote:
You're right a lot of the funding comes from Chevy. I know some folks on the Corvette team and Pratt & Miller does a lot more than just racing. They do military DoD stuff too. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2014, 15:45 (Ref:3418192) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
It depends on the circuit. It changes at other tracks.
|
||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
10 Jun 2014, 20:06 (Ref:3418302) | #83 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,199
|
Quote:
Bob: I don't know guys. How do we spin this? They are about to pull the plug on funding! Fred: I know it sounds crazy, but how about the same way we got money in the first place? We say that racing helps sales? (Uproarious nervous laughter fills the room. It trails off to giggles and finally all is quiet) Bob: Its a long shot, but I like it! Richard |
||
|
17 Jun 2014, 02:58 (Ref:3422847) | #84 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,157
|
http://www.motorsport.com/lemans/new...88381481237582 Steven Cole Smith's commentary about manufacturer involvement circa 1999. Entertaining for the commentary about taking a Cadillac representative into the Mercedes compound as they were withdrawing.
It probably is a good observation-if the company is not willing to carpet the garages, they are not willing to invest to win against other companies. Last edited by skycafe; 17 Jun 2014 at 02:59. Reason: spelling |
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
20 Jun 2014, 23:28 (Ref:3424413) | #85 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 60
|
History has proven that an American effort to win at racing outside of U.S. borders is irrelevant to automobile sales in the 50 states. Therefore, why should they spend the money. Viper withdrew from Le Mans this year due to lack of budget. They would rather focus on TUSCC with their available dollars. That seems to be the way American car companies prioritize.
Cadillac, Panoz, Viper, Corvette, those are small potatoes compared to the quantity of cars the U.S. companies need to sell to stay in business. They also know that they cannot compete with the likes of Audi, Porsche, Toyota, Ligier, Oreca, Rebellion in endurance racing. American car manufacturers are flash in the pan when it comes to endurance racing. They never stay for long, they never do really well. That is their history. |
||
|
20 Jun 2014, 23:47 (Ref:3424414) | #86 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
21 Jun 2014, 00:49 (Ref:3424417) | #87 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
1964--1969----Not a long commitment. Outspent Ferrari to settle a grudge, won Le Mans a couple times, walked away.
Anyway, the thread title maybe should be: "Can the Current American Sports Car Racing Business Offer Reasonable Return to a Manufacturer Considering LMP1?" Pretty obviously the U.S. is the major market, so aside from winning Le Mans I don't see any WEC involvement being sustainable (from a marketing perspective.) And well .... not many places to race a P1 in the U.S. |
|
|
21 Jun 2014, 05:29 (Ref:3424461) | #88 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,126
|
One primary item that's missing in the American scene is an understanding of 'relevance' and how important it is to the future. Without that, it will be the SOS.
|
|
|
21 Jun 2014, 06:02 (Ref:3424468) | #89 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
|
||
|
21 Jun 2014, 07:55 (Ref:3424491) | #90 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
Yeah, how long has vette been there now? Since early 2000's.
|
|
|
21 Jun 2014, 11:07 (Ref:3424539) | #91 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
GTE?
WEC Are American Manufacturers incapable of fielding LMP1?" Why not bring up NASCAR if you want to show U.S. manufacturer commitment to racing in general? |
|
|
21 Jun 2014, 17:15 (Ref:3424667) | #92 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
Incapable? Probably not. Unwilling? Certainly.
|
||
|
21 Jun 2014, 21:42 (Ref:3424723) | #93 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,620
|
Quote:
|
||
|
22 Jun 2014, 01:43 (Ref:3424780) | #94 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Oaky. I thought the post was from RWintle, not Rwindle ... the former I know from long board exposure, the latter is sa stranger.
Because I thoucht the post came from RWintle, who is fairly knowledgeable and would be aware of the long Corvette program, I assumed he must be focusing still on American manufacturer involvement ion P1 where even the Corvette, like the Probe and the Northstar, were all short-lived and sort of half-hearted. Do you believe all that? I might ... or not. The real question is whether an American manufacturer can make an onboard fire extinguisher for a P1. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Manufacturers vs Privateers (LMP1) | Mr Pink | Sportscar & GT Racing | 15 | 19 Apr 2014 00:43 |
Your dream All-American Racing Team (LMP1) | FstrthnU | Sportscar & GT Racing | 22 | 31 Jul 2013 05:14 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
Are Jag incapable? | Super Tourer | Formula One | 39 | 27 Apr 2001 08:48 |