|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 Jul 2010, 15:54 (Ref:2735861) | #76 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
30 Jul 2010, 15:56 (Ref:2735862) | #77 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
30 Jul 2010, 15:57 (Ref:2735863) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
The rules obviously allow it, otherwise the car wouldn't be legal to race. And it is, and nothing you can tell me can make that go away... BMW has build the most sophisticated GT2 racer so far (you admitted that yourself) and instead of getting to work and improve their own cars, all Ferrari and Porsche do is ***** and moan to have them penalised. I thought you cheerish engineering above all else, if that would be the case you would admire BMW for building an excellent car. But I guess engineering is only cool if your favorite manufacturer ends up winning.. I would understand this discussion if BMW would beat Porsche and Ferrari week in, week out, if there was an obvious balance problem. But that is not the case! Even in the ALMS where the M3 is least restricted they haven't managed to win one single race this year! So much ado about nothing... |
||
|
30 Jul 2010, 16:04 (Ref:2735864) | #79 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
30 Jul 2010, 16:14 (Ref:2735872) | #80 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,487
|
They have had a car on the podium at pretty much every event this year, and if i remember correctly they have had a 2-3 finish twice, all thanks to there fantastic 50:50 weight distribution gained by moving the engine back further than the regulations allow.
|
||
|
30 Jul 2010, 21:59 (Ref:2736098) | #81 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,958
|
Quote:
The deal with the tires is most likey hogwash. Last edited by chernaudi; 30 Jul 2010 at 22:16. |
|||
|
30 Jul 2010, 22:18 (Ref:2736109) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,958
|
And now on topic, with the GT2 and GT3 cars being so equal, why not mirge the two classes(not just for IMSA but the LMS and FIA GT endurance races)? The cars perform about the same and cost about the same. Makes sense to me.
However, it also begs the question: How are FIA and ALMS/ACO GT2 cars different? Because the ACO GT2 cars have out-ran the FIA GT1 cars in LMS races. |
||
|
30 Jul 2010, 22:56 (Ref:2736121) | #83 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
On ultimate pace, the FIA GT1s are still quicker than GT2s, to the tune of 3 seconds in qualifying for the Spa 1000km. In racing conditions, which are less ideal, the gap will be reduced. Also, the Saleens running in LMS this year are NOT up to the pace of the GT1 regulars this year, as they were 3-4 seconds off the leading pace in class at Spa.
There is also the sprint nature of the new GT1s to consider, but then, some of those cars did last several hours at Le Mans this year, so they aren't nearly as close to grenading as some would like to think. I think GT1 was pegged back in anticipation of the slower LMPs coming in for 2011. Now that this concern is no longer an issue, they could, theoretically, crank things up on their GTs (the FIA, I mean), which could make the new LMP2s, at least, look a bit slow. This could, though I'm not expecting it will, get very interesting. As for GT3, there was mention in the announcement that they would be giving the FIA GT2s more power to give a more pronounced separation between classes. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
30 Jul 2010, 23:19 (Ref:2736126) | #84 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
giving gt2 more power, wou;d separate the classes, but it might unfairly benefit some teams, those porsche engines are preaty thin as it is, (i thing the old gt engine started its life as a 3l now its a 4), and adding more hp might make them seriusly unreliable.
It would be far more easier to reduce the power of the gt3, since they are all performance equalissed, they could easily lower the bar at the begging of the season. |
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
31 Jul 2010, 06:13 (Ref:2736209) | #85 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Arakis- Those Porsche engines, in turbo form, have produced over 600 hp so I think they can handle another 5% increase in air restrictor diameter quite comfortably.
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 06:53 (Ref:2736214) | #86 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
and since the stroke didn't change it means the bore did, and that means thiner walls, I am just saying its not exacly fair to porsche to push the power anvelope, because as the power of the cars increasses and the speed with it the 911 platform becomes less usefull. and it not fair since all other engines i the class are downtuned versions of the road cars, only Porsches engine is overtuned |
|||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
31 Jul 2010, 07:16 (Ref:2736217) | #87 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
I understand. My point is that the 4L were required under the current engine regulations in order to remain competitive. If those regulations are changed, then 4L may not be required.
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 08:41 (Ref:2736232) | #88 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,437
|
DSC reports that the #92 G2 Ferrari is already a DNF following a heavy qualifying accident. Down to 40.
|
||
__________________
Nulla Tenaci Invia Est Via |
31 Jul 2010, 13:47 (Ref:2736347) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
TV coverage started- weather looks dry but overcast
|
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
31 Jul 2010, 13:47 (Ref:2736348) | #90 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,487
|
Johnny bloody Herbert commentating, where is RLM when you need them...
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 13:49 (Ref:2736350) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
any direct stream links, I am at the university and their IE is out of wack
|
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
31 Jul 2010, 13:50 (Ref:2736352) | #92 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,167
|
if there's nothing wrong with my maths,the race is going to start in 10 minutes,but the bloomberg tv is still showing some GT3 videos while GT2 tv is still relaxing.
|
|
|
31 Jul 2010, 13:52 (Ref:2736354) | #93 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,487
|
Im watching on Motors TV here in the UK.
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 13:52 (Ref:2736355) | #94 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Does anybody have a live-timing link? Thanks..
|
|
|
31 Jul 2010, 13:54 (Ref:2736356) | #95 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Timing should work here: http://static.sportresult.com/federa...ml?class=TOTAL
TV at http://gt2europe.com/liveGT2.php |
|
|
31 Jul 2010, 13:59 (Ref:2736361) | #96 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,167
|
Quote:
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 14:05 (Ref:2736367) | #97 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Is timing working for anyone? All I get is a black page..
|
|
|
31 Jul 2010, 14:08 (Ref:2736369) | #98 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 216
|
Same here
|
|
|
31 Jul 2010, 14:12 (Ref:2736372) | #99 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,857
|
No need for live timing Bruni is running away with it and if they have a trouble free race they will win. This shows exactly what is wrong with GT3.
|
||
|
31 Jul 2010, 14:13 (Ref:2736374) | #100 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 712
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[FIA GT Race] FIA GT Rnd 6: Spa 24 hours 27-29 Jul 2007. | minimangler | Sportscar & GT Racing | 290 | 5 Aug 2007 18:56 |
Spa 30/1st oct Weekend | v8mgbgt | Motorsport Art & Photography | 17 | 12 Oct 2006 15:12 |
Spa 24 Hours | MikeHoyer | Motorsport Art & Photography | 8 | 7 Aug 2006 00:13 |
Who is going to the Spa 24 hours? | Osella | Trackside | 10 | 28 Jul 2005 08:14 |
[FIA GT Race] FIA GT Rnd 7: Spa 24 Hours 29-31 Jul | vandijk | Sportscar & GT Racing | 100 | 5 Aug 2004 15:17 |