|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Mar 2017, 07:55 (Ref:3717701) | #1176 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 8,298
|
As fans you DO have a choice
If you all start the sheep herding and just pay for it relentlessly like Hindu cows, it will just carry on getting more expensive. Move around to different companies meaning you have to sub to different ones too. If you don't and you fall away in your droves they will have to do something about it. You have to understand these sports are sold like milk is to supermarkets. If you can make a series sound amazing, cretinous tv companies will get sold down the river just like granny with her fake PPI claim does every day. They are sold on figures that don't add up, ratings that are make believe and numbers that are thrown at people to make it look like an unreal deal! If the series booms like MotoGP has, you get a good deal like BT did, if it flops like speedway or WRC, then you get a dud that gets passed around like a poor relation. It is up to us as fans to not pay, or suffer the consequences. We were not consulted in this route, it was just decided by FOM, Dorna, IMG or whoever needed to make more money, and the only way they could was to sell the rights to people. The figures were fine, ratings were fine, just they weren't making enough money from the host tv company, so they put it out to tender. We were not asked, we are being asked to pay for their greed, that's all. Time to put a stop to it once and for all. |
||
|
10 Mar 2017, 09:44 (Ref:3717717) | #1177 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,311
|
Thats very true. If the first "pay per view" boxing events of the mid 90's had flopped, then we wouldn't have had to put up with it, however enough people with more money than sense was willing to fork out for the "event" and a precedent was set. If everyone had voted with their feet and refused to buy it, it would have died a death and the sport would still be on either pay channels or free to air TV.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2017, 14:44 (Ref:3717786) | #1178 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,185
|
Isn't £10 a race cheaper than now? If I was to pay for Sky, I'm pretty sure it'd cost more than £20-£30 a month to get it. If I get each race individually through NowTV, it would cost £7 just for the race, without practice and qualifying. A pass for the whole weekend would cost £11.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2017, 15:25 (Ref:3717790) | #1179 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,783
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Mar 2017, 16:20 (Ref:3717816) | #1180 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,995
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Mar 2017, 19:34 (Ref:3717870) | #1181 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,676
|
I watch other channels other than just F1 or indeed just sports so I'm not paying £x just for F1. I'm paying for a whole TV service enormously better than the tripe Channels 1 to 5 trot out as alleged "entertainment"
|
||
__________________
"If we are all god's children, what's so special about Jesus?" - Jimmy Carr |
10 Mar 2017, 19:44 (Ref:3717873) | #1182 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,185
|
Quote:
To put £30 in perspective, the entire WEC season (9x6 hour races, plus the Le Mans 24) is £40. Blancpain is free for the entire year. Creventic is free for the entire year. BTCC is free on ITV4 (also available online on ITVs website). ELMS is free, IMSA is free (outside the US), etc etc. These series are no where near the scale of F1, so obviously could never charge what F1 does. But if you want to know why I now watch other series, but can only dip into F1, there's the reason why - I simply cannot afford or justify the money for it, when literally every other series I'm interested in is cheaper by a magnitude of 10, or free. |
||
|
10 Mar 2017, 19:47 (Ref:3717874) | #1183 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,185
|
The channel around 2002 - ish did include practice. I watched a Malaysian GP, I think 2002, including practice sessions. I don't know about earlier or later though.
|
|
|
10 Mar 2017, 23:50 (Ref:3717910) | #1184 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
IIRC it was later than 1996. Around 2002 as mentioned as I was still a student. Multi screen and £10 for each race including practice. I liked it. About half way through the season there was a 'season' discount making it cheaper. I got sky because of it (had cable before).
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
11 Mar 2017, 09:08 (Ref:3717942) | #1185 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,804
|
Definitely was 2002, just before Bernie closed it down due to lack of interest
Of course anyone remember when you could watch the entire weekend on Eurosport? |
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
11 Mar 2017, 10:54 (Ref:3717960) | #1186 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,676
|
Ahhh the good old days back when before Bernie's pension fund wasn't the prime motivator behind most F1 decisions.
|
||
__________________
"If we are all god's children, what's so special about Jesus?" - Jimmy Carr |
12 Mar 2017, 18:51 (Ref:3718228) | #1187 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
12 Mar 2017, 19:51 (Ref:3718238) | #1188 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
Or the four hour season review programme they did! When did that stop? Was 1996 the last season?
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
13 Mar 2017, 09:18 (Ref:3718327) | #1189 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,804
|
Yes in 1997 ITV made sure they got exclusive rights, as they were afraid when they went to their adverts, viewers would switch to Eurosport and not come back
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
13 Mar 2017, 12:16 (Ref:3718349) | #1190 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,311
|
Those ITV adverts bloated from 3, 30 second ads to about 6-7 by the end of their contract. Funnily enough I watched a race in Italy in about 2003 and they only had a single ad break of 20-30 seconds then back to the race. Maybe had a handful during the whole race.
|
||
|
13 Mar 2017, 21:33 (Ref:3718454) | #1191 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 660
|
|||
__________________
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true." -Robert Wilensky |
24 Mar 2017, 09:17 (Ref:3721092) | #1192 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,406
|
Sean Bratcher, F1 commercial boss, has announced that Liberty Media are currently looking into ways fans would be able to pay to watch F1 qualifying and races using the internet.
Sounds like a move in the right direction. Apparently to be introduced as soon as pre 2018 season. |
||
|
24 Mar 2017, 11:07 (Ref:3721121) | #1193 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,329
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
24 Mar 2017, 14:06 (Ref:3721178) | #1194 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,030
|
Quote:
which isnt so bad...a free version with ads with an option for a 'premium' subscription without ads is pretty much the prevailing model for app based distribution. its important to have both imo. i am curious to see what they would do for commentary though. |
|||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
24 Mar 2017, 14:31 (Ref:3721189) | #1195 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,710
|
Commercials? Cars with logos are commercials themselves.
If I were Red Bull, Mercedes or Martini, I would want as many viewers as possible. |
||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
24 Mar 2017, 15:27 (Ref:3721202) | #1196 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,804
|
Sponsors will be unhappy if there are too many unable to pay to watch them
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
24 Mar 2017, 19:27 (Ref:3721253) | #1197 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,185
|
A preimum online subscription without ads would be a lot cheaper than the premium TV subscription we have at the moment.
|
|
|
27 Mar 2017, 11:32 (Ref:3721841) | #1198 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 8,298
|
Sponsors know the deal before they get involved, they know that F1 is behind a paywall and likely to be behind an ever bigger one in the future.
So it's up to them if they think they are getting a good or bad deal. The sport is rapidly losing fans, so that is more of a worry than anything else, I think the sort of deals that are done by major F1 sponsors, tv coverage is not that pivotal, it is tie ins, advertising away from actual racing channels, media, social media that is the big thing. Networking really. |
||
|
27 Mar 2017, 11:49 (Ref:3721844) | #1199 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,908
|
i disagree completely, the only reason major sponsors are involved is the coverage that they get in the markets they sell in so with falling audiences and also the narrowing of that audience to the point where only those paying high fees for it then the returns the sponsors will get will reduce the return on that investment. Yes there are sponsors who spend company money for there own reasons but they are small fry now days and will never bring in enough to run a top team. If F1 goes totally pay to view then IMHO it will slowly die
|
||
|
27 Mar 2017, 11:52 (Ref:3721846) | #1200 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,724
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
Tags |
pinks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If you have Sky, who did you watch the Chinese Grand Prix with -Sky or the BBC? | Born Racer | Formula One | 59 | 21 Apr 2012 19:45 |
2011 UK TV coverage - Sky to drop IndyCar? | jondownunder | Indycar Series | 23 | 8 Feb 2011 19:48 |
UK viewers - what did you think of the Sky Sports coverage? | Knowlesy | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 76 | 6 Apr 2008 06:13 |
[TV] F1 TV coverage in the UK (merged) | TheMong | Armchair Enthusiast | 30 | 13 Apr 2007 08:33 |