New rod differential - Page 5

Feliks · 8 May 2011, 22:59 (Ref:2877114)

You know how it works "Underwater Windmill" ?

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 13 May 2011, 09:39 (Ref:2879764)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ3Pohh502E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW1Fedhx6Nc

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 15 May 2011, 16:40 (Ref:2880687)

"The gain in kinetic energy resulting from the increased linear velocity in the throat is offset (i.e., balanced) by the decrease of pressure in the throat. The reduction in pressure which occurs when the fluid flows through the throat is called the Venturi effect and is named after the Italian physicist Giovanni Battista Venturi (1746 - 1822) who first observed the effect."

http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Venturi_effect
http://www.hippocampus.org/homework-help/P...Simulation.html

Andrew

Feliks · 28 May 2011, 20:48 (Ref:2887240)

Lesson Two: in terms of fundamental historical

Venturitubes 1937.pdf

On the pictures below you can see how small the venturi nozzle is to drive the gyroscopes in the strands. My finger and applied on the next hand, illustrate the size of the venturi tube. It is almost equal to the diameter of my finger. Now, please imagine how much energy to give the fan with the same diameter of my finger...

Since the narrowest point of the venturi tube, we can easily get up to 10 times higher air velocity, we can mount the engine behind the jet frame, which at high speeds the inlet has a good performance.
For example, you can mount an engine on an Tourist Plane, which reaches 200 km / h at the entrance to the RAM JET would be about 2000 km / h....
This will generate additional good sequence, using a very simple engine ( or two )

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 31 May 2011, 16:09 (Ref:2888830)

Quote:

Originally posted by Feliks

On the pictures below you can see how small the venturi nozzle is to drive the gyroscopes in the strands. My finger and applied on the next hand, illustrate the size of the venturi tube. It is almost equal to the diameter of my finger. Now, please imagine how much energy to give the fan with the same diameter of my finger...

Regards Andrew

A venturi tube so small as my finger is able to propel a large heavy rotating disk gyroscope air to 10 000 RPM, and even walk through the air filter....

Since the gyroscope can be power, relatively high compared to the diameter of the venturi tubes (1 ") and he has the 2 ", then maybe you can do in F1 KERS Venturi "?
The air sucked into the engine can be sucked through a venturi tube so, resulting in a negative pressure to drive the gyroscope, which will keep energy....:tsk

That would be something like a turbine gives energy, but the intake pipe. Turbo

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 2 Jun 2011, 10:22 (Ref:2889888)

http://www.pilotfriend.com/training/..._wing/gyro.htm

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/1982636.pdf

Andrew

Feliks · 21 Jun 2011, 21:57 (Ref:2903159)

Another animation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz2rQvCxp44

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 23 Jun 2011, 17:48 (Ref:2904851)

Quote:

Originally posted by monkeysandbearspants
Having digested the content of the thread i conclude that the answer could be one of these !!

However weight may be an issue and mostly certainly there would need to to be some boot modifications!

[img]http://gallery.seloc.org/albums/userpics/32421/****_off_engine.jpg[/img]

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/s..._index_ang.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/s..._urw_zawor.htm

http://www.full-ahead.net/Silownia/s..._index_ang.htm

double bottom fo foam
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus?gl=PL&hl=pl#p/u/53/Cfp0BWKwdgY dno

large swimmer:
http://www.youtube.com/user/pawielus...92/mnxWu3oWghs

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 30 Jun 2011, 22:01 (Ref:2908924)

[quote name='Feliks' post='5125841' date='Jun 24 2011, 15:36']I thought about that. The float on the animation gives the impression of a small..[/quote]

I think that this would be accurate...

http://www.dieselduck.net/videos/04%20weat...ough%20seas.wmv

I wonder how many tons of water would be able to pump out the 100-meter high tank, during one cycle of the wave?

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 3 Jul 2011, 03:41 (Ref:2914161)

The Red Baron Windmill:

Due to the vacuum created by the wing, over which the wind flows, wind turbines in the channels of collective spin vacuum and provide energy....

Here you can see demonstrations of the film that created a vacuum at the top of the wing when the wind blows on him.
The resulting vacuum can suck the ball into the pipe passing through the wing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IFfnbjY8

By placing many of the holes on the top of the wing, use the vacuum on the entire surface of the wing. The Assembly shall meet in two sustaining supports and drives the suction fans to them with normal air pressure.
This will of course be used to produce energy,
and its amount will depend on the size of the system...

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 6 Jul 2011, 00:40 (Ref:2922603)

Well, some developing:

Of course, you must use the entire art of loving wing aerodynamics.
And How companies grow one way: speed amplifier in the form of air intake venturi nozzle.

Well, and a new kind of wings...
Venturi nozzle flat... After all the two wings made contrary to each other..

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 8 Jul 2011, 11:48 (Ref:2923633)

In other forum :
[quote name='gruntguru' date='Jul 6 2011, 08:37' post='5147823']
Those wings need endplates.

Seriously - using the flow in a secondary device means that a lot of the wind power is wasted, because the mass flow through the turbines is much less than the wind mass flow captured by the machine.

I have seen some interesting and original ideas in this thread, but you are wasting YOUR energy trying to improve on the efficiency of a modern wind turbine.
[/quote]

All of this, I waste my energy ,you able to understand that there are other, much more efficient ways of using wind energy.

I know your great love for modern wind turbine, but you must remember that any excessive love sent your eyes, and impossible for an objective view of reality.

Besides, is not just about the same efficiency, but also for it to be able to build a very simple structure that even the next 4,000 years will exist. I makes sense to build on the sea, because they almost always wind blows from one direction - from the sea. And so it will probably still over the next 4000 years...
* In such a structure may be, for example, 100 such horizontal " flat venturi " and long for 300 meters. Constructed channels will lead to negative pressure turbines which generate much electricity. And the only element consuming to be turbine generators. The rest should survive 4000 years without repairs...

So with these issues will be decisive, not only we can improve the efficiency of Venturi amplifier.

Well unless the people have lost the ability to build such structures ...

And here in a better resolution though you wanted to see more details:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...h_Pyramids.jpg

But who will be Pharaoh??

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 11 Jul 2011, 00:07 (Ref:2924851)

And here's the picture of Homer family watching the Red Baron Windmill prototype with flat Venturi nozzles.
If you meet all expectations, this is a prototype of Homer performs with Stone, as Pharaoh himself had wished.
And it will be a very durable building, well, for example, compared to the ridiculously short life of nuclear reactors...

Best Regards Andrew

Feliks · 15 Jul 2011, 17:03 (Ref:2927140)

[quote name='gruntguru' post='5167127' date='Jul 12 2011, 06:36']With a dash of fantasy.[/quote]

Oh yes, a little bit of you have, then a little knowledge and work reliably over the idea and new invention ready.....

Here you can see perfectly that we can get plenty of potential energy generated by the aerodynamics, without any propellers....
It allows a range of up to 3000 km by glider...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding

Andrew

Feliks · 18 Jul 2011, 17:55 (Ref:2928194)

In other forum

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henning

Oh yes, a little bit of you have, then a little knowledge and work reliably over the idea and new invention ready.....

Here you can see perfectly that we can get plenty of potential energy generated by the aerodynamics, without any propellers....
It allows a range of up to 3000 km by glider...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliding

Andrew

tir:

The main energies supplied to a glider is gravity and convection(solar) energy. Even a glider has to be able to change it's vector to operate at a gain. At the end of the day, a glider has produced very little work. If you were to try to power the world on the work performed levels of a glider, it would be a herculean task.[/QUOTE]

You know perfectly well, with new ideas about the rank of the fundamental, very difficult to penetrate to the use of mass...

But thanks to people like you, we can slowly try to..
Another, although not looking as Hekules, we have on video..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb8IFfnbjY8

Instead, we can build an automatic flow of balls so that they can be sucked into the pipe.
A falling ball (or WATER) with wings, they can hit their way back after a shoulder wheel, similar to a water wheel, giving him his potential energy ..

Well, the automatic circuit, will cause the "Hercules" he can rest.
This is just an example of how we can use another way of generating energy this way.

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 30 Jul 2011, 18:53 (Ref:2933510)

Love for "tuning" not gone...

In other forum:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicegrip

Correct if you calulate based on single lift pulse per wing cycle. Bees get 2 lifts per wing cycle. People used to think the earth was flat and at the the center too.

Please to let us know how to make complex structures that are both strong enough to self suport and to resist 4000 years of storms? We simple people can see how a simple shape pile of rocks could last in an area that does not see sub 0C temps. Now all you need to do is figure out how to make electricity from a pile of rocks.

The pile of rocks:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackTalon

Hmmm, as someone with a structural engineering background, I see potential problems with that structure :lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lupin..the..3rd

Needs more rocks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicegrip

No, I think it needs less air.

And I have hope that over the last 4,000 years we have learned, to build something more than just the pyramids and the pyramids.... :roll:

Andrew

Feliks · 30 Jul 2011, 18:54 (Ref:2933512)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henning

Well, with that lovely airfoil texture, I'm sure that that will start producing usable amounts of energy any time it's within the eyewall of a hurricane....

Also such a pile of stones, and a dangerous element of water, politely puts 2000 MW....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicegrip

Not stones, Concrete with much steel and piping in it. Well under 100 years old and under constant care, maintenance and upgrades. Nothing polite about this project. Read up a bit and you will find it was made out of men and material. 0.0 % clever, 100% brute force and slide rule engineering.

Concrete is a pile of stones, only a tiny...

If we use the design of computers, calculators to calculate the type,
http://www.flowmeterdirectory.com/fl...turi_calc.html
http://www.hanleyinnovations.com/vf50.html

It can be 100% clean design
And even more politely 'll gain energy. And then it will be possible, for the next 4000 years.

Andrew

Feliks · 30 Jul 2011, 18:55 (Ref:2933513)

Snoopy inspired me..

First, the architects built the pyramids, then the rectangular houses. Now for the houses in the shape of airfoil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak4Jg...eature=related

Regards Andrew

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJtYvsDKQV8&NR=1

Feliks · 1 Aug 2011, 17:10 (Ref:2934600)

As if someone is not loved music, it can be so..

‪Snoopy And The Red Barron (Peanuts)‬&rlm; - YouTube

But you should see that Snoopy House can ...fly

‪ANGEL GUADIANIA Snoopy VS the Red Baron‬&rlm; - YouTube

Andrew

Feliks · 5 Aug 2011, 12:58 (Ref:2936131)

Andrew

Feliks · 6 Aug 2011, 10:36 (Ref:2936395)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Clarkson

Indeed it is

The Multisnoopy Ship

This is Beautiful..

This is the modern variant of a sailing ship... so that the sails are not torn...

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 9 Aug 2011, 20:51 (Ref:2937794)

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06...-than-the-wind

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNbNN...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPOql...eature=related

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing..._than_the_wind

Aerodynamic coefficient Cx is very small. It is certainly much smaller than in the traditional ship...

This is not a traditional sail 2D, but the full 3D structure. Energy is processed and used to drive water propeller. Why can swim backwards and forwards. Like a film with 2D fan.
So many of Snoopy Ship has a much higher efficiency due to 3D

Andrew

Feliks · 22 Aug 2011, 18:58 (Ref:2944322)

Regards Andrew

Feliks · 6 Sep 2011, 01:47 (Ref:2951477)

Old ideas in new study:
This gear drive in a helicopter that is bothering me. Another way to get rid of her. By the way, turned out that the rear propeller and also you can get rid of , because the helicopter does not have the torque of the main propeller.
The helicopter had already been built. But it had drawbacks: no, for example, could not take full advantage of autorotation, because the propeller with a hole through the center did not have good aerodynamic properties....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Ouest_Djinnn

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:He..._and_blade.jpg
I missed this problem and the propeller is as it is most optimal.
Also today after assuming control of the helicopter adjustable nozzle (vectoring nozzle) on the outlet gases from the turbine driven, will be very precise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbomeca_Palouste

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ne_of_F-35.jpg
In summary the lack of a gear transmission and rear propeller helicopter will certainly reduce weight.

Andrew

Feliks · 8 Sep 2011, 11:21 (Ref:2952630)

Here PhotoStream proposal, which has improved aerodynamics and a little stiffness to the system add..

some histo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9633v6U0wo

http://www.new4stroke.com/percival.pdf

http://www.new4stroke.com/AIAA-Presentation.pdf

Quote:

Originally posted by Chopper
Welcome back Andrew.

One day it will fly

:eureka

http://tipjet.com/tj_pho_gallry.htm

Andrew

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Differential	silente	Racing Technology	6	11 Jun 2006 07:02
Qualifying differential	skidmark	Formula One	7	29 Jun 2000 05:27