|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Oct 2012, 06:36 (Ref:3150264) | #101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Oct 2012, 06:43 (Ref:3150267) | #102 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Last year they did slightly more. See http://fiawec.alkamelsystems.com/Res...Speed_Race.PDF |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 06:51 (Ref:3150269) | #103 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
Going faster now, 28.4 from Audi.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:02 (Ref:3150270) | #104 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
That's what, about 5 or so seconds clear of a GT500. It seems that Nakajima is about spot on with saying that an LMP1 should clear a GT500 by about 5-6 seconds once the track rubbers in.
|
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:06 (Ref:3150271) | #105 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
He said race pace. Qualifying for GT500 in the dry this year was in the 33s. But the record is from last year in the low 32s. So far, on ultimate pace it's 4-5 seconds. But if they turn 29s and 30s in race pace, that's 5-6 seconds faster than GT500 as they run in the 35s.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:26 (Ref:3150276) | #106 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
Lapierre still turning in the laps, hovering around the 28's and 29's well into the stint.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:39 (Ref:3150281) | #107 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
If it is a long run, I will calculate the average lap time once the timing data becomes available on http://fiawec.alkamelsystems.com/
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:57 (Ref:3150285) | #108 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
#1 Audi and #7 Toyota both ran 1:28.4, and it seems that the #2 Audi mostly did long runs as it's fast lap was .7 slower. And it seems late in the session that the factory LMP1s leveled out to running lower 1:30s, but I can't tell if it's a double stint that any of them are on this late.
|
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 07:57 (Ref:3150286) | #109 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
He's the least experienced one here also. I think Nakajima will be their fastest, but Lapierre got within 4 thousandths of Audi's best.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 08:00 (Ref:3150289) | #110 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
Wurz dropped down almost into the 1:31s for a lap or two--tire fall off or bad traffic? Also, neither Audi was much faster than that late in the session, either, mostly running mostly low to mid 1:30s.
Difference between #1 Audi and Toyota for fast lap was .004 of a second, #2 Audi ran the most laps at 57 laps. Odd to see the #1 Audi making shorter runs and making about 5 stops compared to only 2 or 3 for the #2 and about 4 for the Toyota. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 08:07 (Ref:3150290) | #111 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The #1 Audi spent quite some time in the garage to fix accident damage. That is why it did less laps than the other cars.
Quote:
Audi used an interesting strategy for the #2 car. McNish drove the complete first session and now Kristensen got the complete second session. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 08:22 (Ref:3150297) | #112 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
Quote:
|
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 08:32 (Ref:3150304) | #113 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
As promised, a calculation of the average lap for the long runs on the second session.
Wednesday testing:
Friday practice:
Based on the lap times on the live timing, I expected the average lap time of Lapierre to be a bit faster. However, apparently he did two extremely slow laps because of traffic in sector 3: 1:34.838 on lap 10 and 1:35.163 on lap 31. If I exclude these laps, his average lap time would have been 1:30.094. Note that the long runs of today confirm that Toyota will do 32 lap stints and Audi 35-36 lap stints. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Oct 2012, 08:47 (Ref:3150308) | #114 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
Strange at Speed.com that Dagys didn't report on the #1's run-in with a Corvette, but he did report an intra-Toyota incident where the #7 Toyota and the #12 Rebellion Lola made contact near the very end of the session, but without much damage to either car. At least someone is making parts for Lola LMP cars even though the company, for the time being at least, has basically shut down.
That could explain the 2:14 lap time for Wurz--probably a pit out lap, though he was scored as being on track and not on an out lap. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 09:11 (Ref:3150313) | #115 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
Toyota's twitter says towards the end they were doing pit stop practice.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2012, 09:14 (Ref:3150314) | #116 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Lapierre comments that Audi and Toyota have similar pace at the moment: Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Oct 2012, 09:24 (Ref:3150319) | #117 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Last edited by gwyllion; 16 Oct 2012 at 10:36. Reason: correct URL |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 10:20 (Ref:3150345) | #118 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
I thought it was an out lap from the stop the resulted from the spin, because the time lost was about 45 seconds compared to a normal time of about 1:30, but that depends on how long it would take to get on and off pit road, which at Fuji is moderately long.
It also didn't help that Dagys, aside from reporting no damage on either car, didn't go into detail about the incident, whether it was a spin or just a collision. Either that or Wurz had a puncture and limped the car around to the pits instead of abandoning it or running back and having a delaminated tire destroy a good chunk of the car's bodywork and suspension--after all, the #1 Audi lost several laps worth of time to repair a tweaked suspension earlier in the session, though contact seems to have done the damage as opposed to a resultant puncture. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 10:51 (Ref:3150359) | #119 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,404
|
Quote:
For the record the Toyota/ Rebellion clash was a minor side to side affair - No major damage, no drame, no action from stewards. The Audi Corvette incident impacted on a wheel/ corner - Only sensible that they'd change that corner bearing in mind the forces involved. Again deemed a racing incident - no further action. |
|||
|
12 Oct 2012, 11:17 (Ref:3150375) | #120 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
So it seems that if no damage was done to either car, it does seem that it was a driver change practice, which after all is what TMG reported as happening in the very last minutes of practice (Note, DSC is reporting that Wurz briefly stopped the car before returning to the pit area).
45 seconds is a lot of time lost for a minor spin or contact unless it was a puncture or the car stalled on track, but a driver change practice makes sense, as a driver change takes about 20 seconds for a good one (with no other service), which means at Fuji maybe about a 20 second or so run down pit road? This does lead to a discussion about strategy, since the ideal situation for a 6 stop race is 34 lap or longer stints it seems depending on race pace. Audi can go 35-36 laps, Toyota it seems can manage 32 when pushed as far as speed. Depending on relative race pace between Audi and Toyota, it seems that Toyota might need a lead of about 35 or so seconds to keep the lead after a late race splash, depending on pit road delta times and how much fuel will need to be brought on board. One thing about Fuji's pit road is that it has that chicane like entrance, and though it's a long pit road, delta times depend on the speed limit zone length and where it starts and ends. I can't remember where such zones were located for the F1 races there, but the WEC probably have similar in/out zones. Also strange to note that the #49 Oreca and the #71 Ferrari ran out of fuel on the very last lap, and Toyota ran their car out of fuel at Bahrain during practice. Not only does it beg the question about telemetry, but it doesn't leave any questions about fuel strategy for those teams. Last edited by chernaudi; 12 Oct 2012 at 11:36. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 11:44 (Ref:3150382) | #121 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
In Sao Paulo Toyota had to do a last fuel stop 5 min before the end of the race and this stop toke 36 sec. See http://trussers.blogspot.be/2012/09/...nterlagos.html In order to make up for that additional time in the pits, Toyota has to be at least 0.15 sec faster per lap than Audi. That is doable because Toyota does no have tyre wear issues during a double stint. |
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 11:52 (Ref:3150384) | #122 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
about testing the limits of a fuel tank - isn't that a good idea? ok, itd be preferable to do it in testing but is this one of those circuits at altitude? |
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
12 Oct 2012, 12:44 (Ref:3150402) | #123 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
12 Oct 2012, 13:57 (Ref:3150426) | #124 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 64
|
For the record (and just to show that I'm paying attention, gwyllion), the pit in - pit out distance at Fuji is 467m and at Interlagos is 384m. Therefore an additional 83m at 60kph - adds around 5s to the pit stop time.
|
||
|
12 Oct 2012, 14:12 (Ref:3150431) | #125 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spa 6 hours 2012 | Peter Mallett | Historic Racing Today | 441 | 10 Nov 2012 17:53 |
[WEC Race] Bahrain 6 Hours 2012 | GT3.14 | ACO Regulated Series | 299 | 3 Oct 2012 16:19 |
Zolder 24 hours 2012 | snowen250 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 21 | 8 Sep 2012 14:17 |
2012 24 Hours of Daytona | kober | North American Racing | 209 | 1 Feb 2012 08:39 |
Dubai 24 Hours 2012 | RoeDent | Sportscar & GT Racing | 121 | 16 Jan 2012 10:18 |