|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Jul 2012, 07:52 (Ref:3104968) | #101 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
a lmp combined class was already in 2010.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 12:25 (Ref:3105073) | #102 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
||
|
11 Jul 2012, 12:40 (Ref:3105083) | #103 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,016
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2012, 14:05 (Ref:3105149) | #104 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Dropping LMP1, regardless of how small it is now, will be a hit in perception for the series. Guys want to be in the "top class", even if they can't afford it right now. And those who are in it are NOT going to want to take a step down.
Also, if Sebring remains a combined round with WEC, you don't really have a choice but to keep LMP1. It would be too strange for the series rules to seemingly change in such a drastic way during the season. Not to mention, ALMS teams are NOT going to accept being taken out of even a theoretical chance of snagging a high finishing position overall. In addition, because of the Challenge class participants, the ALMS can't afford to hand over either of its big endurance races to the WEC. On the P1 front, could the new CN-spec Oreca indicate that they'll be coming out with a coupe LMP at some point here? |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
11 Jul 2012, 16:09 (Ref:3105201) | #105 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
Quote:
Whether or not they find customers for it is another matter. |
||
|
11 Jul 2012, 16:13 (Ref:3105204) | #106 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...-for-2013-aco/
The GT class gets more fragmented for 2013. Sweet, more classes fix everything. |
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 16:26 (Ref:3105212) | #107 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 723
|
So.. If we are a little bit unlucky, we will see 6 GTE Pro cars and 4 AM cars. Sweeeeet.
|
||
|
11 Jul 2012, 17:11 (Ref:3105226) | #108 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,016
|
The World class Global leader in Green racing For the Fans has done it again, just what the series needs... more classes. If it isn't broken don't fix it. Only 30-ish cars in 6 classes is horrible.
|
||
|
11 Jul 2012, 17:57 (Ref:3105253) | #109 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 409
|
Not just more classes, but classes with only 2-6 cars in them.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 18:04 (Ref:3105255) | #110 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 664
|
Aren't there a lot of F430 GT2 in the USA? Those might race in the hands of gentleman drivers in GT-Am?
|
||
|
11 Jul 2012, 18:12 (Ref:3105257) | #111 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
There's probably a few, not sure what the point would be though. The 458 is GT-am eligible and a much better car, the 430s wouldn't be anywhere near the pace of it now. The handful of GT-Am level teams in the US that ran the 430 (Waltrip, Krohn, ESM) have all moved on to the 458.
|
|
|
12 Jul 2012, 02:04 (Ref:3105406) | #112 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
|
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 02:50 (Ref:3105414) | #113 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
12 Jul 2012, 03:00 (Ref:3105416) | #114 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
Maybe this is the ALMS' way of luring Krohn and Waltrip away from WEC? And it also keeps the Lizards, ESM, and AJR happy as the article said.
I think having a GTE-AM class is much better than having a GTC class. Unless GTC opens up to more manufacturers, they should might as well scrap that class. GTE-AM is succeeding in Europe for a good reason, and it can succeed in NA too. |
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 03:13 (Ref:3105417) | #115 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,016
|
I have an idea on the future class structure for the ALMS:
1990sBenettonF1 LMP1Pro LMP1Am LMP2Pro LMP2Am LMP2Cup LMP3 LMPCPro LMPCAm LMPCCup LMP5000 DeltaWing Spec Class Abruzzi Spec Class Panoz Hybrid Spec Class Imsa Lights CN DPG1 DPG2 DPG3 GTEPro GTEAm GTECup GT3Pro GT3Am GT3Cup Grand Am GT GTX Porsche Cup Ferrari Challenge Lamborghini Trofeo 90sGT1 GS ST In line with their way of thinking, and should certainly pack the grid numbers in, lets also give a trophy and podium spot to everybody just for showing up. |
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 03:21 (Ref:3105418) | #116 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
Wow a bit too far but funny nonetheless! We might have 6 classes in 2013 but hopefully it will be reduced to 4 (maybe 3?) by 2014!
|
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 05:12 (Ref:3105426) | #117 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
I think this way, WEC should have LMP1, LMP2 (phase out later if LMP1 grid is bigger), and GTE-Pro, while ALMS/ELMS/AsLMS should have LMP2, CN (if possible), GTE-Pro. and GTE-Am. |
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 07:06 (Ref:3105442) | #118 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
Toss in Supertouring too! Those cars provided good races way back when. I think am drivers deserve a fair stab at it, IMSA should consider sub dividing the classes based on skill level. Gold, Silver, Bronze, Platnum, rusty, etc.... Better yet do what they do in motorcycle racing and add age classes, over 25, 30, 25, 40, you get the point... |
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 07:12 (Ref:3105444) | #119 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
12 Jul 2012, 12:22 (Ref:3105555) | #120 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 239
|
The closer alms is to aco rules, the better the series. Le Mans is the draw. The rules will allow the gentleman driver a chance to compete.
|
|
|
12 Jul 2012, 15:59 (Ref:3105652) | #121 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Depending on the number of actual potential entrants, this could be positive. Even if the grid doesn't increase any, and the number of GTC entrants become GTE-Am entrants, it is a net positive, moving to non-spec entries. I think that we will see five classes again in 2014, with 2013 being a transition out the GTC year. But seriously, this is basically the tail end of the field, and what is needed is focus on providing better visibility and ROI to attract more quality entrants and sponsors, particularly at the front of the grid. |
|||
|
12 Jul 2012, 17:02 (Ref:3105667) | #122 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think the new ALMS slogan should be "Everyone gets a podium" |
||||
__________________
-Nate |
12 Jul 2012, 17:23 (Ref:3105674) | #123 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
12 Jul 2012, 17:49 (Ref:3105685) | #124 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
My opinion is that this is not an additional class, but a replacement class for GTC. I believe that GTC is being given one more year, for those entrants to amortize their current costs, and be able to afford new machinery by no later than 2014. This of course is how IMSA has operated, in allowing old rules machinery a grandfathering period for some time, and is continued here. People complain about spec categories, and then the series makes a move that should gradually phase out a spec category, and they complain more. I am most certainly a vocal critic at times, but I can't see why the gradual removal of a spec category, for an open category is a bad thing. One year of an extra category... big deal.
|
||
|
12 Jul 2012, 18:20 (Ref:3105703) | #125 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Perhaps some of you need to take a look at the class breakdowns at Le Mans from the 1950s and '60s. They had 9-12 displacement classes, and many of those were further subdivided by whether you had a (S)ports racer or a (G)rand (T)ourer.
I don't like the idea of a huge number of classes today, but let's have a bit of perspective here, because this is hardly the pinnacle of class complexity, even for Le Mans. In the prototype ranks, some things need sorting, which hopefully will happen come 2014, but for one, it just seems out of whack that LMP2s can have bigger engines than LMP1s. And in GT, the restrictor tables need some looking over, to see about making forced-induction cars a viable option. One good thing with GT-Am is that the sticker price on a year-old car shouldn't be so bad, plus running costs should be somewhat lower with less advanced machinery. Specifically for ALMS 2013, I'd like to see P1 and P2 combined. It's probably best to leave PC out of that mix though, and just let them continue to run as they are. The schedule could be rather interesting, as we know we have Austin coming. It is somewhat expected that Belle Isle will be back on the calendar (with rumors saying it will be the long circuit), and there is the chance that the ALMS will be back at Houston as well (perhaps part of why they went ahead this year and moved Petit Le Mans). |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ALMS 2012 Discussion | joeb | North American Racing | 2895 | 2 Oct 2012 22:16 |
ALMS 2011 Discussion | HORNDAWG | North American Racing | 2661 | 9 Sep 2011 20:09 |
ALMS 2010 Discussion | tlongman | North American Racing | 2547 | 13 Sep 2010 23:09 |
ALMS 2009 Discussion | Mal | North American Racing | 2888 | 22 Sep 2009 07:20 |
ALMS 2008 discussion | brielga | North American Racing | 1290 | 8 Oct 2008 18:34 |