|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
7 May 2015, 15:02 (Ref:3535176) | #1351 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
|
|
|
8 May 2015, 03:14 (Ref:3535366) | #1352 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
If we look at the LMP1-L or privates, the only close thing to compare is Spa. If we compare Rebellion performance in 2014 and ByKolles in 2015 we could say that both are very close. Rebellion arrived to Spa in 2014 with both new cars without other previous race, while ByKolles arrived to Spa with a very modified car since Silverstone (new gearbox, new suspension and new aero).
Let's see: Rebellion Spa 2014 Best Qualy time was 2.09.4 with the only car that completed a lap. Best Race time was 2.08.9 (the other car got 2.13.2 before retire) ByKolles Spa 2015 Best Qualy time was 2.06.5 Best Race time was 2.09.1 Meanwhile for 2015 Rebellion will be using the AER engine (same as ByKolles), but I can't say if they modified the car more than to put the new engine. Rebellion has the advantage to have two cars and more experience, while ByKolles car looks fragile and never finished a race. So, we will have to wait for Le Mans test to see how close is one to the other. |
||
|
8 May 2015, 03:16 (Ref:3535367) | #1353 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
ACO might've heard me... us moaning about the lackluster support action for WEC as there is some actual historic racing besides Porsche Cup at Nurburgring 6 hours
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2015/0...-for-2015.html There's other kinda positive stuff there too, but... Shanghai AsLMS race - the whole 3 hours of it - is in the morning before 6 hour race... on Sunday... yeah... makes sense... how hard would have been to merge that sub 10 car grid into WEC again and not really loose any faces. |
|
|
19 May 2015, 03:00 (Ref:3539174) | #1354 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/n...mp1-programme/
Let's look at it financially-wise, BMW made 6.2 billion dollars in profit, last year. For reference, Nissan made only 850 million dollars, Mercedes/Daimler's 2014 profit was only 1.24 billion dollars meanwhile VAG and Toyota have net profits in the double digits billions and their 2015 has been on the rise of what was already a very healthy 2014 |
|
|
19 May 2015, 03:39 (Ref:3539187) | #1355 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 522
|
Quote:
|
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 13:50 (Ref:3550294) | #1356 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
WEC Championship picture can't be forgotten with LM. #7 Audi trio extended their points lead in the Drivers' title hunt. Audi also got a healthy points haul even without the win, while Porsche's win helps make up for the #17 not scoring points at Silverstone.
Audi should be good at the Nurburgring and COTA, while the Tilkedromes might favor Porsche depending on what Audi might have up their sleeve strategy and aero-wise (high downforce LM kit for the Tilkedromes, or low drag sprint kit). Toyota, though, are probably out to lunch while work begins on the TS050. |
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 14:05 (Ref:3550303) | #1357 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
People said the same thing in 2013 about Toyota, yet they were faster than Audi in the last 3 races and wouldve won them all but for a puncture at Shanghai. The reasoning was the same too, they'll have to use funds to concentrate on "next year's car".
We also heard that Audi were no longer focusing on '13's car so thats why Toyota caught up. But then 2014 came and Toyota was faster. So its not impossible to think Toyota can improve the car over the summer and challenge for wins while simultaneously developing 2015's TS050. But it wont be easy. Lets first see what regulation changes they do to slow the cars down! |
|
|
14 Jun 2015, 14:11 (Ref:3550305) | #1358 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 771
|
I expect to see everyone now adopt the wing mirror design of the Audi. It's a straight drag reduction with no impact on the downforce.
|
|
|
14 Jun 2015, 20:13 (Ref:3550461) | #1359 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,208
|
Quote:
|
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 20:29 (Ref:3550466) | #1360 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,710
|
Totally agree - the focus now is to get ready for Silverstone 2016.
|
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 21:05 (Ref:3550480) | #1361 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Again time to realize how awful this summer gap to Nurburgring is. This just needs to fixed for 2016. Flyaway round - maybe not, but I don't totally buy the "teams need time to stackup spare parts etc" reason. TUSC is racing in two weeks, ELMS is racing in four weeks from now. If it is financially hard, so is also letting all of this positive PR generated by the big event vaporize as weeks go by.
|
|
|
14 Jun 2015, 21:23 (Ref:3550485) | #1362 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
There's the WEC-sanctioned test at the Nurburgring at the end of July. Even then, that's still a month until the actual race weekend.
|
||
|
14 Jun 2015, 22:26 (Ref:3550514) | #1363 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Jun 2015, 00:52 (Ref:3550548) | #1364 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,208
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Jun 2015, 05:25 (Ref:3550612) | #1365 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
I dont buy that. Theres a big difference between focusing on 2016's car and giving up completely on the current car to design next year's. Im not sure if you're suggesting theyre done trying to win in 2015? No team does that until a certain point in the year before they switch over all development. I dont see how its this soon. Theres still a championship to play for, no matter the standings. Plus it seems like the 2016 car is in its early stages,with the drivetrain yet to be finalized.
|
|
|
15 Jun 2015, 13:11 (Ref:3550739) | #1366 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,629
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Jun 2015, 16:53 (Ref:3550817) | #1367 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,710
|
|||
|
8 Jul 2015, 06:23 (Ref:3556693) | #1368 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
||
|
8 Jul 2015, 13:25 (Ref:3556750) | #1369 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,483
|
Every time I read about WEC and it's 'desire' to become a success in the US I feel like throwing up, Neveu and the FIA are so cocky about where they race it's unbelievable, if you want fans to show up at your races and make your event(s) a big hit there are multiple options to go, Sebring obviously being #1 (plus Road America, Road Atlanta, etc.)!!!
Instead they opt to continue struggling at Texas' premier parking lot.... |
|
|
8 Jul 2015, 13:53 (Ref:3556755) | #1370 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 207
|
Quote:
Adapt or die. |
|||
|
8 Jul 2015, 14:11 (Ref:3556758) | #1371 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8 Jul 2015, 14:16 (Ref:3556760) | #1372 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,483
|
If FIA/WEC want to establish a successful presence in NA they should have started at a solid base with a known reputation - not at unknown territory for sportscars racing.
Don't make it sound like you're interested in fans when all you care for is reveling in corporate mania.... |
|
|
8 Jul 2015, 15:19 (Ref:3556775) | #1373 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,909
|
|||
|
8 Jul 2015, 19:58 (Ref:3556836) | #1374 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
A lot of people went to Austin last year. I dont understand how anyone thinks its failing. I get that the series doesnt run in your favorite track, but thats a harsh reality you need to face. All we hear is Austin is a parking lot and has heaps of runoff. Yeah its not the most scenic, but until Sebring or Road America etc. bring their facilities up to the fia's 'standards', you're stuck with f1-style "parking lots".
|
|
|
8 Jul 2015, 22:25 (Ref:3556869) | #1375 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 99
|
Going to Sebring (or another classic American sports car track) might be the best way to increase WEC's popularity in the States. That's what I think WEC should do, you can keep the COTA race for hosting American corporate guests then.
But I'm afraid neither WEC or IMSA have the will to make that happen. Even if WEC accepted Sebring as a track, they probably wouldn't want a joint race with another series and I can just imagine IMSA don't want WEC to take the limelight in one of their premier races. I guess Sebring would upgrade their facilities if they really wanted to get WEC and would need upgrading but with NASCAR/IMSA owning it now, WEC isn't in their focus. The only good thing about that is having no fear of Tilke being hired to "improve" the track. I almost dislike the WEC schedule even more than F1. After you leave the European tracks (even which are turned into parking lots), you finish the season on four Tilkedromes of which China and Bahrain have nothing else to give to the series than money. Meanwhile one prestigious sports car races Sebring and Petit are just regional championship rounds. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMSA USCC in 2016 and 2017 | Bob Riebe | North American Racing | 5472 | 29 Sep 2017 11:27 |
2015 Silly Season | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 2559 | 20 Jun 2016 03:31 |
2015 IndyCar schedule | NaBUru38 | Indycar Series | 330 | 19 Jun 2015 12:11 |
2015 Dakar Rally | NaBUru38 | Rallying & Rallycross | 16 | 28 Jul 2014 14:47 |
Melbourne has contract to 2015 (?) | Marbot | Formula One | 23 | 18 Jun 2008 13:09 |