Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing > ACO Regulated Series

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 Jan 2008, 18:25 (Ref:2100774)   #126
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckosaurus
Would the larger restrictors not mean the extra power is released without having to rev higher?
Yes and NO. The engine is designed then tuned for the restrictor size.

Smaller restrictors ( Larger hole) will allow more air to pass though in to the Throttle bodies. Large Restrictors ( Smaller hole) will limit the air flow, however the speed of the air flow velocity into the throttle bodies is greatly increased.

So the options are:
move volume of air at slow velocity = pushing the HP UP THE RMP range
or
less air at high velocity = pushing the torque levels up in the lower rpm range.

Little over simplifed but that is the idea.
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 6 Jan 2008, 19:12 (Ref:2100794)   #127
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, even though I will probably be sanctioned for it;

Lets revisit the question that was asked.

Quote:
Truckosaurus; Would the larger restrictors not mean the extra power is released without having to rev higher?
I still contend that the engine (production type homologated) was not designed for maximum volumetric efficiency at the operating rpm range with the particular restrictor being applied by the ACO in mind. And that if it is allowed a larger restrictor it will produce more power without changing the rpm operating range with any significance. Point of example is the larger restrictor allowed with a/c and the h.p increase gained by it! Granted there comes a time when there is an over-saturation of combustables and to utilize them an increase in rpm or chamber pressure is the only way to do so, but IMO this does not fit into that category.

L.P.

Last edited by HORNDAWG; 6 Jan 2008 at 19:14.
HORNDAWG is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 12:25 (Ref:2101137)   #128
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by HORNDAWG
Well, even though I will probably be sanctioned for it;

Lets revisit the question that was asked.



I still contend that the engine (production type homologated) was not designed for maximum volumetric efficiency at the operating rpm range with the particular restrictor being applied by the ACO in mind. And that if it is allowed a larger restrictor it will produce more power without changing the rpm operating range with any significance. Point of example is the larger restrictor allowed with a/c and the h.p increase gained by it! Granted there comes a time when there is an over-saturation of combustables and to utilize them an increase in rpm or chamber pressure is the only way to do so, but IMO this does not fit into that category.

L.P.
Maybe you just didn't read my post fully:

All other things about the engine remaining equal, the engine will have to rev 22% faster to generate 695 bhp than it was spinning to generate 570 bhp.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 12:40 (Ref:2101141)   #129
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
Maybe you just didn't read my post fully:

All other things about the engine remaining equal, the engine will have to rev 22% faster to generate 695 bhp than it was spinning to generate 570 bhp.
HP is not Linear at those levels and "All things can not be equal at those RPM levels"
to go from 570 to 695, the engine would need to be reconfigures with different intake, cam shaft(s) plus the engine management tuning would also need to be different not just increase RPMs
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 13:23 (Ref:2101159)   #130
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
HP is not Linear at those levels and "All things can not be equal at those RPM levels"
to go from 570 to 695, the engine would need to be reconfigures with different intake, cam shaft(s) plus the engine management tuning would also need to be different not just increase RPMs
It is pretty linear - except for friction of course.

However, I think I will leave you lot to nit-pick, hair split and generally bicker amongst yourselves......
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 14:05 (Ref:2101180)   #131
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix

However, I think I will leave you lot to nit-pick, hair split and generally bicker amongst yourselves......
well said........we have a ball park power figure from my calculated estimation, and the engine will spin faster due to the increased restricrtor area, yes the GT1 engine will need a heavy re-work for LMP1 spec.......now please, lets just leave it at that

anyways, just read about the GT2 AM project on DSC......they are mentioning a Prodrive launch or something like that at the Autosport show.....perhaps all our chat about LMP1 AM's is a waste of time?
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 16:13 (Ref:2101260)   #132
eddsc
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 240
eddsc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No. Not at all.
eddsc is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 17:28 (Ref:2101310)   #133
fish88
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Netherlands
Posts: 286
fish88 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by knighty
well said........we have a ball park power figure from my calculated estimation, and the engine will spin faster due to the increased restricrtor area, yes the GT1 engine will need a heavy re-work for LMP1 spec.......now please, lets just leave it at that

anyways, just read about the GT2 AM project on DSC......they are mentioning a Prodrive launch or something like that at the Autosport show.....perhaps all our chat about LMP1 AM's is a waste of time?
I thought Barwell will drive with these cars not Prodrive itself.
fish88 is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 19:26 (Ref:2101395)   #134
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddsc
No. Not at all.
sounds like you know more than your letting on ......you can trust us, we wont tell anyone......honest
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 19:42 (Ref:2101402)   #135
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
It is pretty linear - except for friction of course.

However, I think I will leave you lot to nit-pick, hair split and generally bicker amongst yourselves......
Fine you belive what you want. at those higher RPM levels, 6000 plus HP incease is not linear. from 2000 to 5250 rpms yes it is linear

Unless you care to post a good AM V12 dyno graph (SAE corrected) that shows differnly?
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 20:08 (Ref:2101422)   #136
class4v
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Belgium
Posts: 128
class4v should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Do yo remember Lola saying that there was some interest by a manufacturer for their P1 Coupé... I do.
With Corvette's LMP1-a- like thing in testing (all kind of rumours), some other major manufacturers talking with the ACO, and the altered engine rule in ACO's rule book... what a fantastic time it will be for sportscars
class4v is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 21:56 (Ref:2101481)   #137
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
Fine you belive what you want. at those higher RPM levels, 6000 plus HP incease is not linear. from 2000 to 5250 rpms yes it is linear

Unless you care to post a good AM V12 dyno graph (SAE corrected) that shows differnly?
God help me to know the things I can change, accept the things that I can't and to know the difference..............................
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 21:58 (Ref:2101482)   #138
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
There is an AM endurance racing announcement on thurs at the show. See you there Malc
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 23:12 (Ref:2101520)   #139
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
God help me to know the things I can change, accept the things that I can't and to know the difference..............................


Small minds keep things to themselves . .

So What ever. Next
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 23:16 (Ref:2101524)   #140
jhansen
Veteran
 
jhansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
United States
California
Posts: 6,699
jhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjhansen should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Ehem...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamAshmore
Mod note: Trying to score points over each other!

To the mods this certainly seems to be the evident with a few members of this sub-forum. Frankly people notice this style of posting and judge the poster accordingly. However of concern to the mods is that it stops others posting because they can't be bothered to get into an exchange over something petty, or just because they find it tedious in the extreme.

There is no need to pick up on small points to prove you are right. There is also no shame in being wrong about something - you should try it as it is very liberating.

This is not aimed at anyone in particular, but please have a think about whether it applies to you. If you don't see it and continue we will start telling you, as we feel it is driving many with a love for this sport away from our forum.

P.S. There is no need to reply to this, PM if you have any concerns.
jhansen is offline  
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 23:25 (Ref:2101530)   #141
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
yes shall we move on...

Who is going to run the Astons in GT1,2,3,4 then?
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 23:41 (Ref:2101535)   #142
The359
Veteran
 
The359's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,437
The359 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
JetAlliance, Modena, and Gigawave should remain in GT1. Phoenix maybe?

Barwell for GT2.

Barwell as well in GT3, not sure if Scuderia Italia will remain.

JetAlliance I know bought up some GT4s.
The359 is offline  
__________________
Nulla Tenaci Invia Est Via
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 01:31 (Ref:2101572)   #143
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
It's still up in the air whether Aston are involved with Lola, but there is no doubt Lola have something major to announce.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 07:14 (Ref:2101645)   #144
Justin Moran
Veteran
 
Justin Moran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
UK-ROI
St Helens
Posts: 2,356
Justin Moran should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJustin Moran should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss_collins
There is an AM endurance racing announcement on thurs at the show. See you there Malc
OT
ss, if you get a chance come and say Hi, Im gonna be on the BMMC stand all weekend!
Justin Moran is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 10:16 (Ref:2101701)   #145
minimangler
Veteran
 
minimangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Wales
Leftfield, somewhere.
Posts: 2,954
minimangler should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAG
It's still up in the air whether Aston are involved with Lola, but there is no doubt Lola have something major to announce.
STOP SPECULATING!!!!

How many times has that been repeated in this thread?!

So Lola might be involved with Aston. Or anyone else with a V12!

Are we now certain Barwell are running the GT2s? I've had my wrists slapped more than once for assuming!
minimangler is offline  
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with.
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 12:09 (Ref:2101783)   #146
Javi
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Madrid, Spain
Posts: 527
Javi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
you guys are wrong, it´s not a V12, but a V8!!!!

altough i dont think it will beat an Audi R10....

http://www.astonmartins.com/racing/lolaam.htm

(sorry if it has been posted before, but everything was getting too serious)
Javi is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 12:11 (Ref:2101785)   #147
Jimmy Magnusson
Veteran
 
Jimmy Magnusson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Sweden
Posts: 2,264
Jimmy Magnusson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJimmy Magnusson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by minimangler
STOP SPECULATING!!!!

How many times has that been repeated in this thread?!

So Lola might be involved with Aston. Or anyone else with a V12!

Are we now certain Barwell are running the GT2s? I've had my wrists slapped more than once for assuming!
They have said as much as that themselves I believe.
Jimmy Magnusson is offline  
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing.
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 12:42 (Ref:2101804)   #148
Tom908V12
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
France
Paris(France)
Posts: 1,122
Tom908V12 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Can't wait for thursday looks exciting news !!!
Tom908V12 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 12:49 (Ref:2101810)   #149
tramker
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 25
tramker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lola B08/60 Coupe Aston Martin V12

Just saw this car-engine combination mentioned on some news website (don't ask for details, nothing official, no additional info), in some obscure context, but couldn't be accidental. I'm 99% convinced it's going to be announced at the Autosport show.
tramker is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2008, 14:02 (Ref:2101866)   #150
Bentley03
Race Official
Veteran
 
Bentley03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
United Kingdom
Posts: 6,102
Bentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBentley03 will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
The Czech's seem to think there's more than a little truth in the rumour..........

........check out the lists of which cars are participating in which series towards the bottom of the page.

Then again, I don't speak Czech so didn't understand a word of what was said in the article.
Bentley03 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Favourite Aston Martin? TimD Classic Cars 38 16 Feb 2008 14:08
David Ellis' Aston Martin GT700 Kid Prozac Sportscar & GT Racing 2 18 Apr 2002 22:08
Aston Martin Speedworx Sportscar & GT Racing 3 22 Nov 2001 22:52
Aston Martin meeting June 24th TimD Trackside 8 25 Jun 2000 21:40


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.