IMSA IMSA 2025 - Page 6

broadrun96 · 30 Oct 2024, 21:18 (Ref:4233081)

Based on that neither was let go or given a smaller role I would venture GM and employee mutual decision over being replaced for a gain to the programs. Nor would I think either moving would be a sign there's any concern about them being shuttered any time soon

seanyb505 · 1 Nov 2024, 08:36 (Ref:4233262)

Compared to Toyota's recent moves, this seemed like the motorsport experience was a stepping stone for the employees. In my opinion these shorter stint folks are rounding out their resume as they seek to ascend in the company.

**joeb** · 1 Nov 2024, 16:04 (Ref:4233312)

There is a test at Daytona this month and the Valkyrie will be there!

https://racer.com/2024/11/01/aston-m...st-at-daytona/

GT3_Fan · Yesterday, 12:29 (Ref:4234238)

The running costs for IMSA in 2025 must be insane. I wonder if it might be a breaking point. I can see 2026 sked being different. If you are GTP then expect that I guess. LMP2 has a spec car and gets a lighter schedule which makes them the most cost effective these days.

I think GTD can improve. Probably a lighter schedule for them is needed. My suggestion is don't have GTD Am at Petit. I suggested for a long time that Petit LM should be just GTP and GTD Pro only (with guest GTD Am entries if they wish to come race with red number panes). GTD Pro could take off Indy or something extra in the spring. Good news is that most or all the manufacturers are represented in both Pro and Am.

So this reduces running costs and makes some races have smaller grids which could have less safety cars.

JT240Z · Yesterday, 13:30 (Ref:4234243)

Leave the Petit alone. It's the season finally and all classes must be represented. As for Indy, I wouldn't be too upset if they just removed it from the schedule completely.

broadrun96 · Yesterday, 13:37 (Ref:4234244)

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT3_Fan

The running costs for IMSA in 2025 must be insane. I wonder if it might be a breaking point. I can see 2026 sked being different. If you are GTP then expect that I guess. LMP2 has a spec car and gets a lighter schedule which makes them the most cost effective these days.

I think GTD can improve. Probably a lighter schedule for them is needed. My suggestion is don't have GTD Am at Petit. I suggested for a long time that Petit LM should be just GTP and GTD Pro only (with guest GTD Am entries if they wish to come race with red number panes). GTD Pro could take off Indy or something extra in the spring. Good news is that most or all the manufacturers are represented in both Pro and Am.

So this reduces running costs and makes some races have smaller grids which could have less safety cars.

Absolutely THE single fastest way to remove GTD Am from the series is to drop them on a 3 driver track. That's not ever gonna happen and likely the dumbest suggestion for how to 'improve' the series I've heard in a while

flatlandsman · Yesterday, 17:07 (Ref:4234280)

But hey, you are entitled to your opinion, as is he, but never mind, you just say what you think.

JT240Z · Yesterday, 17:32 (Ref:4234282)

Ya, but GT3_Fan's opinion sucks.

He does like to change events he's never attended for silly reasons.

chernaudi · Yesterday, 18:34 (Ref:4234287)

PLM was for all IMSA classes (and ACO classes) when Don Panoz established it in 1998 as the penultimate round for the '98 IMSA GT Championship and pilot race for the ALMS. And unless IMSA defaults completely to ACO/FIA regs, it, Daytona and Sebring will be the closest we'll be getting to having Le Mans style sportscar racing in North America.

And yes, the preponderance of enduros does jack up the budget. I already posted in another thread that the factory Audi Sport program for the Audi R10 in the ALMS in 2006-2008 was $15 million USD for the program. That was for a two car team with fully proprietary cars and in a more open form of the LMP1/LMH/GTP rules cycle (though Audi Sport's overall sportscar budget was much bigger than that if you include testing, Le Mans and in '08 the LMS in Europe). But those ALMS seasons had 11-12 races (similar to today), but the big enduros for the ALMS were Sebring and PLM, though they did also have two 4 hour races those years (Road America and Laguna Seca, as well as Le Mans, which was an optional, non-points round).

In the Weathertech Series this year, you had a 12 hour, a 10 hour, a 6 hour, a 8 hour, and a 24 hour race. But where do you make the cut? Sebring and PLM are legacy races from the ALMS and IMSA GT for Sebring. Daytona and Watkins Glen are legacy races from Grand Am and IMSA GT. That leaves Indy, which has no pedigree for sportscar racing, let alone an enduro, and is presumably there due to Roger Penske (who owns IMS) paying for it and hence IMSA and maybe also NASCAR (IMSA's controlling owner) getting a kickback for it.

And also hinted, the other enduros are there due to being ALMS and Grand Am legacy events, all of which (even PLM to a degree) having roots in the old IMSA GT Championship. So they may be sort of sacred "crown jewel" events. But I don't think that IMSA would want to axe sprint races, either, due to getting lucrative contracts from track owners (as well as the fact that IMSA/NASCAR owns Road Atlanta, Watkins Glen and the lease to Sebring).