|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
14 Mar 2014, 21:01 (Ref:3378729) | #126 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,069
|
That's quite a statement from Christensen. Only guy into the 58's.
|
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23/'24 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
14 Mar 2014, 21:03 (Ref:3378730) | #127 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 149
|
Are GTE louder than f1 now? Just wondering.. 458 and C7r sounds are impressive...
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:05 (Ref:3378731) | #128 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
Z4 is lightweight, runs unrestricted and has a something like GT3 rear wing (if is the same used at daytona). All this helps a lot in first and second sector, I'm not surprised of the pole achieved. Strangely Bruni ran 1 second slower than last year pole (marked by him).
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:06 (Ref:3378733) | #129 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Aren't all LMP and GTE cars restricted to something like 115 dB? According to the FIA measurements F1 cars now are around 125-130 dB trackside, the old V8s were closer to 140 (from a safe distance away).
|
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
14 Mar 2014, 21:10 (Ref:3378734) | #130 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
|||
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:17 (Ref:3378736) | #131 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
PC Qualifying
Junquiera! Edit: He STILL improves! |
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:19 (Ref:3378738) | #132 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Imo Porsche has bs bop in GTE. How theyre still so lightweight after all the testing showing their pace is beyond me! But bmw is at least close with the Vettes right there a few tenths back. Hope P class is close(r).
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:20 (Ref:3378739) | #133 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
So what is the PC track record? Are they close to breaking it?
Also I love Greg Creamer over-prononcing all of the names! lol |
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:25 (Ref:3378741) | #134 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:32 (Ref:3378743) | #135 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 251
|
Agreed the weight break is total rubbish. I still favor the BMW though, Rahal Letterman ahs been strong hear the last few years.
|
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:39 (Ref:3378746) | #136 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Wow, Olivier Pla vs. Sebasiten Bourdais! What a great battle! It's like they're in a whole different class!
So 3 P2s and 3 DPs in the top 6. FInally got the BoP sorted out. Last edited by FstrthnU; 14 Mar 2014 at 21:45. |
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:40 (Ref:3378747) | #137 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
This is an amazing session. P2 vs DP in all its promised glory.
|
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:42 (Ref:3378748) | #138 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 393
|
I'm sure a lot of the cars could've done 1:58s, I find it hard to believe that most of them are slower than last year.
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 21:51 (Ref:3378753) | #139 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,614
|
Possibly the track conditions are slowing the gtlm's?
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 22:10 (Ref:3378756) | #140 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 393
|
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 22:20 (Ref:3378758) | #141 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
http://www.imsa.com/sites/default/fi...20%2314-33.pdf L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
14 Mar 2014, 22:26 (Ref:3378762) | #142 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
|
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 22:28 (Ref:3378763) | #143 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,109
|
I somehow think that the GTLMs will run 1 min 59's during the race quite frequenlty.
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 22:49 (Ref:3378769) | #144 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,208
|
If there's one thing i've noticed in all the years. The BMW team cars always run qualy incredibly close together. So either a) they've actually maxed the potential of the car or b) they're running to a pace. I think it's the latter. I would hope the Viper was sandbagging.
I think Bruni was just playing it safe because he knows the team cannot afford another mistake. |
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 22:52 (Ref:3378770) | #145 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,208
|
Update: Word is Bruni couldn't apply full throttle? and he pulled a 1:59. I have no doubts a healthy Ferrari and Bruni would have been on pole...
|
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 23:00 (Ref:3378771) | #146 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,647
|
|||
|
15 Mar 2014, 00:28 (Ref:3378795) | #147 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
For reference, pole time this year of the AXR DP was a 1:51.9. That's nearly 8.5 seconds slower than the official track record set least year by the Audi R18 last year in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wjIQuKMdwI Shows the difference between a LMP1 and a BOP'd DP/ACO LMP2 combo in the Prototype class. The Audi R18 had tons more downforce, more torque (diesel power, remember), somewhat more HP than a current DP, a more trick suspension system, huge tires and wheels front and rear and was a factory developed car. LMP2s and DPs have less power (LMP2s for sure have a lot less HP than the LMP1 Audi), significantly narrower wheels and tires, and are customer oriented cars. Of course, the Audi running on Michelin tires designed for it that were 36/71cmx18in front and 37/71cmx18 rear, and 14.75x18 front and 14.5x18 rear wheels would alone give more grip than the spec Continental tires on 12.5x18 front and 13x18 rear wheels. Shows how much a different animal that a 2013 factory LMP1 is from the more customer car oriented TUSCC Prototype class, and mind that the new Audi R18 in testing was turning the same lap times that the older car did last year in race trim in spite of narrower wheels and tires and a 4 inch narrow suspension track width. Completely different creatures are the pace setters in Prototype this year vs last year. |
||
|
15 Mar 2014, 00:31 (Ref:3378796) | #148 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,629
|
What was last year's P2 pole?
|
||
|
15 Mar 2014, 00:51 (Ref:3378802) | #149 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,962
|
Level 5 HPD ARX-03: 1:51.159
This year's pole speed is off that by about .8 of a second. DP's are less agile than the LMP2s and LMP2s ran on Michelin rubber last year (though they were just warmed over LMPC tires) vs the Conti tires this year. |
||
|
15 Mar 2014, 01:23 (Ref:3378804) | #150 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 381
|
Quote:
The top 6 cars are within 0.3 sec... yeah totally not fair. Cheaters. How much closer could they possibly get? What results will make you think everything is fair? I know, every car should turn the exact same lap down to .001 sec... totally possible. Do we really want this year to be like the AMR v. Corvette Racing GT1 year where bop was traded back and forth every race? |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FRC 2012 - Round 1: The 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 37 | 27 Mar 2012 14:12 |
[WEC Race] WEC/ALMS Round 1: The 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | ACO Regulated Series | 1168 | 24 Mar 2012 17:20 |
FRC 2011 - Round 1: 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 47 | 27 Mar 2011 03:55 |
FRC Round 1: Sebring 12 Hours | jhansen | Predictions Competitions | 51 | 17 Mar 2008 05:26 |
My pictures from the Mobil 1 12 Hours of Sebring | Mindspin13B | Motorsport Art & Photography | 5 | 24 Mar 2007 05:01 |