|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Apr 2007, 21:46 (Ref:1887551) | #151 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Rustyfan, as to the tunnel divider, you put something in front of it. For the drivers going into the pits, have a guardrail to their left with a curved end facing oncoming race traffic. For those on the circuit at speed, have tires to their right, which will be somewhat restrained by the guardrail. Heck, you could even add a couple of those large barrels in front of the guardrail for a bit more energy absorbtion.
Mountainstar, I think we better check who really wrote that piece. Something's really wrong; I mean, Robin Miller being positive about CART?! What's next?! (as I try to keep from laughing) |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Apr 2007, 22:06 (Ref:1887563) | #152 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
I missed the edit deadline.
Anyway, Rustyfan, don't dismiss my proposal straight away. After all, if someone's throttle stuck, what would stop a really nasty crash from occurring at that point on the course in its current configuration? They could blast right by the temporary curbs, since the far left and right sides of the road are free of obstructions. If someone goes "flying" straight over the curbs, who knows what angle at which they might hit something solid?! |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Apr 2007, 22:35 (Ref:1887584) | #153 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
I think my dad said it best:
"Vegas? They should have raced in the night with all the neon lights lit up." |
|
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing. |
9 Apr 2007, 22:41 (Ref:1887592) | #154 | ||
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Quote:
Appraoching that wall lap by lap at top speed with no braking area carries rather more risk. The potential for horrifying shunts would be enormous. |
||
|
9 Apr 2007, 23:01 (Ref:1887603) | #155 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Either way, with an extra barrier preventing sudden-stop, head-ons, the risk to drivers should be reduced to a reasonable level. There are plenty of tracks (permanent road courses included) where the barriers close in relatively suddenly, and others where the start of pit-wall is very close to the racing surface (as is the case at Las Vegas); this is especially true on ovals.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Apr 2007, 23:31 (Ref:1887619) | #156 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
Quote:
Miller's article primarly praised the Las Vegas track and he certainly wasn't alone in it. |
|||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
9 Apr 2007, 23:58 (Ref:1887630) | #157 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 683
|
||
|
10 Apr 2007, 00:04 (Ref:1887633) | #158 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
Lot of empty seats, whatever session or grandstand it was.
|
|
|
10 Apr 2007, 00:26 (Ref:1887641) | #159 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund |
11 Apr 2007, 00:32 (Ref:1888666) | #160 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
|
Quote:
Yes there were a few things that could have worked better, but after the somewhat tumultuous off-season, I would suggest that Las Vegas was a pretty solid start to the season for Champ Car. |
||
|
11 Apr 2007, 02:18 (Ref:1888689) | #161 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
From a lot of the pictures I've seen taken during the race, the grandstands were full or almost full. Also a lot of people were able to see the track for free so I think it will be hard to gauge the exact attendance.
Overall for a first time event it went well with a great track and great venue. There has been a lot of constructive criticism gathered which I'm sure the race promoters will take on board to make it even better for next year. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 02:23 (Ref:1888691) | #162 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 02:51 (Ref:1888696) | #163 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
Quote:
I think Cannon was the best enginner in the pit lane behind Hampson last year. HVM now Minardi have the nucleus of a potentially winning crew. With Doornbos in that seat (who is a step up from Phillipe) they can win a few races. I'll be willing to eat the crow if I am wrong. |
|||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
11 Apr 2007, 04:26 (Ref:1888709) | #164 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 07:45 (Ref:1888767) | #165 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,265
|
great drive will power - go aussies. Un!
|
||
|
11 Apr 2007, 10:36 (Ref:1888903) | #166 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
Mountainstar: "a lot of people were able to see the track for free."
Oreo story: "vinyl netting obstructed trackside view in most places." |
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 13:04 (Ref:1889003) | #167 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,754
|
Quote:
I taped the Vegas race as well. The only shots in which the grandstands seemed full were close-ups in which no more than six rows of seats were show. The only things older than this tv trick are Norman Normal and myself. In any single "pan shot" of the grandstands during the race the grandstand occupancy wasn't higher than 65% (I measured this by grandstand module). And mountainstar, this is the highest number I could find. Not even the grandstand in front of the pits was more occupied than that. Also, maybe my neighbors - who attended the race in Vegas - drove to St. Pete instead of the Sin City. My neighbor Peter, who is a hardcore Champ Car fan as one can be, told me last night that he had "seen more people in the bleachers of the Burbank amateur soccer league than the few that saw the [Vegas] race." And he called the Atlantics race "the least attended race I've seen in my whole life with the exception of some SCCA scraps in the 80s in Willow Springs". This guy is 65 and has been around the block. Quote:
If I were to ask something I would call for a slightly longer circuit, over 3 miles, but of course this implies higher expenses and right now nobody in this series is swimming in cash. |
||||
__________________
Visit The Motorsport Memorial |
11 Apr 2007, 15:26 (Ref:1889078) | #168 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Heaven is a checkered flag. |
11 Apr 2007, 16:45 (Ref:1889121) | #169 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
My 2C: It looked like the main stands were reasonably full, but had some holes. Yes they did use the show a small portion trick, but they can rarely hide the stands for the whole race. There was one (I can't remember exactly where it was) that was nearly completely empty. It looked like an okay attendance race, not spectacular, but not a failure. Attendance estimates (not by CC) were 40k. So that's probably a weekend attendance of 80-90k.
While the track was truely excellent, I am a little concerned by the money that was spent $15M. On the other hand, anyone who'd spend that kind of money seems pretty determined to make it work. Perhaps some of the less glamourous casinos in the track area pitched in? I suspect that if for some reason CC didn't continue with the race in the future that someone else would take it over. It seems like a solid foundation to build upon. Last edited by Snrub; 11 Apr 2007 at 16:50. |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
11 Apr 2007, 19:35 (Ref:1889230) | #170 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
I expect something similar to San Jose......going to the city for more bucks.....
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 20:33 (Ref:1889282) | #171 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 20:53 (Ref:1889301) | #172 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 20:54 (Ref:1889302) | #173 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Looks like a .9 rating/2 share
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
11 Apr 2007, 20:55 (Ref:1889305) | #174 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
link to a "shakedown"?
|
|
|
11 Apr 2007, 21:36 (Ref:1889331) | #175 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
http://www.baynews9.com/content/36/2...30/235221.html
"Event organizers told businesses lining the race way they'd have to pay a fee, or a tarp would be put up blocking their view. Some businesses are not happy with paying the fees to watch the race, which will be as close as 12 feet in front of some of the stores" "Martin said the only way organizers would remove the tarp is if he agreed to pay a $3,200 fee. He said they originally wanted $4,500 but he negotiated that rate down. " |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAW-DaimlerChrysler 400 @ Las Vegas NEXTEL Cup Event Thread *SPOILERS* | rustyfan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 252 | 13 Mar 2007 23:29 |
I guess we need a LAS VEGAS BUSCH THREAD. | Hazza | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 12 | 11 Mar 2007 04:10 |
Las Vegas Race Weekend Thread (RACE RESULTS INCLUDED) | macdaddy | ChampCar World Series | 58 | 1 Oct 2005 16:05 |
Las Vegas Live Comments Thread | Joe Fan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 56 | 7 Mar 2002 02:30 |