|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Mar 2016, 15:48 (Ref:3625171) | #151 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Throw out PC, bring in GT4?! Maybe not a bad trade-off, though you would cannibalize an already weak CTSC and guys like Reiter would have serious problems coming up with the pay-to-play fee that IMSA seems to require for the Weather Tech Series.
|
||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
20 Mar 2016, 17:06 (Ref:3625214) | #152 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
It shouldn't really, Conti is a high production showroom stock car series. And GT4 got kit cars, in fact the reason why everyone raised a big stink about the Z/28s is well they weren't showroom stock, it was pretty much a illegal kit car allowed in the series.
|
|
|
20 Mar 2016, 17:58 (Ref:3625229) | #153 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
20 Mar 2016, 20:15 (Ref:3625271) | #154 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 298
|
|||
|
20 Mar 2016, 21:10 (Ref:3625286) | #155 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
To be honest, I not sure what is different between a GS car and a GT4 one. I think it's aero, ABS, and TC. I know GS is slower then GT4.
I like to see small bore GT cars in the series, because I believe they have their place in racing. and GT4 sounds like the old IMSA GTU, well except with pony cars. |
|
|
20 Mar 2016, 21:17 (Ref:3625288) | #156 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Quote:
Things changed a bit since then, and there ware a few years when it looked like the class would totally collapse. That's when the organizers opened up the door for the kit car type of cars, but as I said above, the back bone of the class have always been the original gen Astons, BMW E90s and in the UK Ginettas. I am not even too sure about the performance advantage of the Euro-cars. They've got more aero, but they tend to run very low hp. Under 400hp in most cases, I think so that might actually even things out. Quote:
|
||||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
21 Mar 2016, 00:36 (Ref:3625353) | #157 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
There's also the Lotus, Alfa 4c and Mazda MX5s. There's a lot of GT cars with small engines out there
|
|
|
21 Mar 2016, 15:55 (Ref:3625589) | #158 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Quote:
The differentiation between GT3 and GT4 has always been the cars state of tune, not the engine size. |
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
21 Mar 2016, 16:03 (Ref:3625592) | #159 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 86
|
Oh wow, was the British GT MX-5 GT4 car really a €200k one/off? That's insane if true.
|
||
|
21 Mar 2016, 17:28 (Ref:3625625) | #160 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,634
|
It seems Audi is considering turning their TT Cup car into a gt4:
http://sportscar365.com/gt/audi-pois...sion-into-gt4/ |
||
|
21 Mar 2016, 18:55 (Ref:3625674) | #161 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
I didn't know Mazda has a GT4 MX5
Well anyway I believe some series do put a engine limit on GT4 cars. I believe around 3.5 liters or so. Well whatever happens I hope to see some of these cars at the NAEC races. |
|
|
21 Mar 2016, 19:02 (Ref:3625681) | #162 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 86
|
Mazda never did a GT4 car. This was a home made project.
|
||
|
21 Mar 2016, 19:07 (Ref:3625683) | #163 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,340
|
Nope, importer-comissioned project:
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
21 Mar 2016, 19:57 (Ref:3625696) | #164 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
21 Mar 2016, 20:02 (Ref:3625698) | #165 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 86
|
Don't take things too personal, friend. This is the internet after all. I was never making fun of you, just joking with you. No harm feelings!
|
||
|
22 Mar 2016, 06:42 (Ref:3625805) | #166 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 298
|
Alright.
|
||
|
28 Mar 2016, 18:51 (Ref:3628127) | #167 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 252
|
Glad to see the new McLaren 570s Gt4 on track in a recent test. I hope this could be a motivation for few team to race in this class soon...
http://www.motorpix.it/2016/03/25/bl...st-monza-2016/ |
||
|
6 Apr 2016, 20:59 (Ref:3630800) | #168 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 188
|
I can only see the way McLaren have approached GT4 as a bad thing.
It goes against the ethos of the class with extreme power, high levels of down force. To to mention centre lock wheels etc This is only going to raise the cost of running in the class to levels that it then excludes a large proportion of the likely racers just as the class as growing. The additional upgrades that the other manufacturers will now start looking to apply to their cars to make them competitive will be prohibitively expensive devaluing current cars maybe to the point of loosing a lot of the current entrants. This is before teams have to start investing in the extra equipment that will be required to run the cars as up until now the cars have only required fairly basic equipment opening up the options to run the cars to lots of new teams moving up the ladder. I hope it doesn't as I see GT4 as the future of the start of GT racing steps and hope it will grow in its current guise. |
||
|
19 Apr 2016, 15:08 (Ref:3634869) | #169 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,906
|
||
|
19 Apr 2016, 19:50 (Ref:3634962) | #170 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 343
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Apr 2016, 08:55 (Ref:3635059) | #171 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,906
|
Shame no Ginetta's.
|
|
|
20 Apr 2016, 09:28 (Ref:3635068) | #172 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,043
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
20 Apr 2016, 09:31 (Ref:3635070) | #173 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,043
|
Why? I understood why they were allowed to race when the category was in it's infancy, in order to build grids, and the Ginettas are relatively affordable GT race. Cars but Gi ettadoes t even make a road car anymore, so imho they should not be allowed in FIA competition, and it's arguable whether should be allowed in national series anymore either.
|
||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
20 Apr 2016, 09:39 (Ref:3635071) | #174 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,906
|
Because I like Ginetta. You could probably say the same about the Sin R1.
IMO Ginetta belongs more to GT4 than McLaren. |
|
|
20 Apr 2016, 09:40 (Ref:3635072) | #175 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,906
|
Some news about the Porsche Cayman GT4:
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/0...customers.html Porsche is making a mess of it. This is not the way you treat your customers. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dutch GT4 | Huib | Sportscar & GT Racing | 13 | 12 Apr 2009 12:06 |
[FIA GT] GT4 - Who's building it? | Bramzel | Sportscar & GT Racing | 22 | 15 Mar 2009 19:50 |
GT4? | Ranald | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Dec 2006 23:28 |
I have GT4 - what do you want to know? | C32 | Virtual Racers | 10 | 18 Jan 2005 12:29 |
Gt4 | Smokey 6 litre | Virtual Racers | 22 | 8 Feb 2004 23:41 |