|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Aug 2009, 08:58 (Ref:2524884) | #151 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,010
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Andretti, Mario: Auto racing legend owns the rights to an unspecified Spinal Tap song, which he purchased when former manager Ian Faith secretly sold the band’s catalog |
20 Aug 2009, 09:14 (Ref:2524892) | #152 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Quote:
That would fit with the putative 1986 debut of it, but the car we see here looks a lot more modern, much more like the 1992 time period dj mentions. Might thus there be two unraced Alfa Romeo Group C cars? |
|||
|
20 Aug 2009, 10:25 (Ref:2524942) | #153 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
The 1986 thing was surely the silhouette formula car built by Bernie's Brabham, which seems basically to have been either an attempt to emulate NASCAR, or kill off the world touring car championship before it started.
|
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
20 Aug 2009, 12:17 (Ref:2525005) | #154 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Perfectly possible it was the 164 ProCar that was being referred to - although the 19 year old complete car geek I was at the time should have known the difference. Nice, albeit brief video of the 164 on YouTube here.
|
||
|
20 Aug 2009, 12:34 (Ref:2525014) | #155 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
I remember there were rumours about a Group C project from Alfa Romeo at the very start (1982/83), possibly with some wind tunnel testing models evaluation, and then the 3.5 atmo car, never seen on the magazines until second half of the '90s. Also a friend went with an university visit to the Fiat wind tunnel early '90s and saw a model of the car. No way they could have done a 3.0/3.5 atmo car with the old "fuel consumption" rules, look at the troubles Ford had with the DFL... |
||
|
20 Aug 2009, 13:05 (Ref:2525025) | #156 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Quote:
I can see how it could easily be interpreted as a Group C. I'm all too familiar with the DFL problems - although wasn't that at least partially down to the vibrations produced by the V8 configuration - would the V12, or even a bored out development of the 1.5 liter V8 turbo, have suffered the same sort of problems (without digressing far too far from the topic?). |
|||
|
20 Aug 2009, 16:10 (Ref:2525104) | #157 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,936
|
If the engine was indeed a hack of the F1 engine, which the 333sp's engine was based on as i recall, then they are linked, albeit quite loosely, as mike said, he's in contact with the designer so we will wait until then to see what emerges, out of interest, who penned the 333sp? i seem to remember it being a rather famous F1 designer am i right?
|
||
|
20 Aug 2009, 17:03 (Ref:2525130) | #158 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Aug 2009, 18:41 (Ref:2525163) | #159 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,936
|
Quote:
on another note, another Alfa, the 8C GT2 that was planned never really came to fruition unfortunately, i would love to have seen a GT version of that car, beautiful with a snorting V8. |
|||
|
21 Aug 2009, 06:59 (Ref:2525362) | #160 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
Itrs a huge shame Grp C ended when it did, the Alfa would have been a stunning (if unreliable!) addition to the Jag, Merc, Toyota, Pug, Nissan, Brun, Konrad, BRM, Spice, Lola, Mazda (JAG) etc. |
|||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
21 Aug 2009, 09:11 (Ref:2525427) | #161 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Quote:
Agree utterly regarding the collapse of Group C. It's probably fair to say that the 3.5 liter move was a mistake, but all that notwithstanding, there was enough machinery out there to have a superb series in 1992/93 had it been managed properly, but of course, by then the FIA had got their hands on it and a combination of ridiculously short races, the demise of start money, and a curious selection of events probably put paid to any chances of it seeing through the early '90s recession. It is still one of the great 'what if' scenarios I happily indulge in when in idle moments. |
|||
|
21 Aug 2009, 09:13 (Ref:2525429) | #162 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,834
|
And anyone who wonders why Bernie killed it, just look at that list of names!
At least 4 ended up in Bernie's Flying Circus! |
||
__________________
Tim Yorath Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Fan of "the sacred monster Christophe Bouchut"... |
21 Aug 2009, 09:47 (Ref:2525444) | #163 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
I dont think Bernie or the FIA Helped the case with a raft of daft rules designed to cripple the series, however don't forget the world had slipped into a recession in the early 90's which then did for the private teams. The same cycle we are now falling into i fear. Its such a shame that the series failed when it did, that rosta of cars, plus the ones we heard nothing about but must have been thought about would have been amazing. Would a Grp C series in 93 - 94 onwards have kept the long distance format? the move was already towards shorter sprints. |
|||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
21 Aug 2009, 10:31 (Ref:2525466) | #164 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,982
|
Gosh - time to fall back on archives rather than trying to wrack brains on this one! When exactly did they start going to shorter races?
Longer races (with the ability to appeal to the wealthy amateur) would have insulated the series from the recession, as would a sensible European focused calendar and in particular clarity about 1992. The failure until very late in the day to actually agree to run a series I fear killed off Konrad and Brun at least, as, I would argue, did a failure to convince Mercedes and Jaguar to stay around (here however the focus on F1 made that something of an impossibility). It's a massive counterfactual and probably required too many changes from what actually happened, but given the series survived the oil shock period (albeit shakily) it shouldn't have been beyond the bounds of possibility. On that topic, I seem to remember a very turnkey March 3.5 liter project around the same time as the Lola - this ring any bells for anyone? |
||
|
21 Aug 2009, 11:02 (Ref:2525488) | #165 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,834
|
Bernie wanted short races to take redundant F1 motors... It was all aimed at taking Group C out, to leave F1 as the undisputed king of motorsport.
Oh, and there was also a power struggle with ACO, IIRC, to boot... |
||
__________________
Tim Yorath Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Fan of "the sacred monster Christophe Bouchut"... |
21 Aug 2009, 11:22 (Ref:2525495) | #166 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
1989- though a few shorter races had started to creep into the schedule in 1985/6- (Shah Alam in Malaysia (800km) at the end of '85 was the first, and then a few 'sprints' were included from 1986 on- usually 360km, plus the much shorter Norisring races) . The rest of the races stayed at 1000km until '89, when the race distance was hacked right down to 480km, and then I think again to 430 for 1991
|
|
|
21 Aug 2009, 11:34 (Ref:2525501) | #167 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
|
||
|
21 Aug 2009, 11:35 (Ref:2525502) | #168 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Even that wasn't necessarily the problem. The killer was surely the insistence that teams take part in ALL the races. Someone like Roy Baker hoiking all the way to Japan in order to avoid a $100k fine?
|
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
21 Aug 2009, 11:37 (Ref:2525504) | #169 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
Thats not to say they did not want to make one and may even have said they could, but weather anyone would taken them seriously is another matter. With the demise of the private teams, then the incentive to make them goes as well. Did Porsche ever have any interest in the 3.5 litre cars? |
|||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
21 Aug 2009, 11:43 (Ref:2525506) | #170 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,060
|
Why did Bernie want to kill off Gp C - did he think it was crap or too much competition ot F1? I was a bit young to remember the ins and outs though I do remember Bernie always referred to Gp C as 'bloody Group C.'
|
|
__________________
All the same, isn't there a grand oul stretch in the evenings... |
21 Aug 2009, 11:50 (Ref:2525509) | #171 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
Enough teams, both works and private had made cars suitable, but the rise in costs due to enforced attendance at all rounds would have been a problem for the smaller teams, and then the larger works teams would have weighed up the relative merits of F1 and Sportscars, sorry to say that Sportscars would not have won that meeting at a time of a global downturn. End result no group C what part Bernie played in that and if he engineered it is a moot point, surfice to say the ACO vs FIA battle and any hope of a US series going down the tube did not help either. |
|||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
21 Aug 2009, 11:55 (Ref:2525512) | #172 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Quote:
The sponorship pool would also be diluted. |
|||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
21 Aug 2009, 12:48 (Ref:2525535) | #173 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
After the 'full-season' rule was brought in, as I recall, most of the local Japanese privateers (Nova, From A, Trust etc) used to turn out at Suzuka using the likes of Almeras, Obermaier, Salamin, Tim Lee-Davey etc as a 'flag of convenience', the Japanese entries either replacing the European cars, or sometimes appearing as a second car (on paper at least) for a European team who had made the trip- either way, presumably a few Yen changed hands in order to sign off the deal...? |
||
|
21 Aug 2009, 12:58 (Ref:2525540) | #174 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
I can't remember whether there were any rumours of Porsche interest in the 3.5 regs or not- they did of course build a 3.5 litre V12 for Footwork/Arrows in F1, but I don't think there was much chance of that ever appearing in the back of a sportscar once they realised it was better suited as a boat anchor than it was a race engine.... http://www.forix.com/8w/engines/por-v12.jpg |
||
|
21 Aug 2009, 19:47 (Ref:2525718) | #175 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is the most raced car? | graeme | Trackside | 19 | 27 Jun 2004 16:56 |
Ever raced on TV? | Hobson | Racers Forum | 23 | 2 Sep 2003 10:27 |
Eddie would have raced at Jordan for nothing | Valve Bounce | Formula One | 13 | 29 Jan 2003 01:32 |
Best Track that You have Raced on | Brock | Racers Forum | 10 | 22 Sep 2001 02:23 |
I have just raced against John Clelands' Engineer | Sodemo2 | Touring Car Racing | 1 | 24 Feb 2001 18:00 |