|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Jun 2017, 13:02 (Ref:3745513) | #176 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,232
|
Shame the only "press" we get on TA these days is when Drissi has gone rouge...
|
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
12 Sep 2017, 19:02 (Ref:3766363) | #177 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
I went to a Trans-Am at Road America a short time ago for the first time in decades; I am glad I went.
Removing the bridge did the track no favors but I am still amazed at how much it changed it. I was there shortly before it was removed. The food has gone downhill though, that is very sad. The race though, while not a nail biter like the NASCAR was entertaining. The tube frame TA are obviously faster, but the variety of the classes is what makes it worth the trip. Dodge won the TA2 which was nice for variety. Sadly the Trans-Am classes all run on Sunday now and not on Sat. which the drivers I spoke to said was not real bright as the first race was at 8:00 A.M and the tracks opens at 7:00 A.M. plus on Sunday you now MUST buy a paddock pass which makes a pre-ordered ticket cost 50 bucks and at the gate 70 bucks whereas a Sal ticket is only 35 bucks. If the Trans-Am were on Sat., as they used to be, I would never waste money on a Sun. ticket again. The NASCAR/ARCA cars are boring same crap, different pile things. The track radio announcing though is excellent, the national TV boys could learn something from them. The NASCAR race though.did remind me of the 1970 race at Donnybrooke and the 1974 race at Road America for drama, I will give it that much credit. Too bad the cars are boring generic looking things. |
||
|
12 Sep 2017, 19:28 (Ref:3766368) | #178 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
the TA2 cars are all the same from a chassis perspective. Just like the NASCAR/ARCA cars.
|
||
|
12 Sep 2017, 19:31 (Ref:3766369) | #179 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
Other than that, just that rookie Chris Dyson and Andy Lally ran the WG TA race and the majority owner of Trans Am is Parella Motorsports (which runs SVRA). |
||
|
12 Sep 2017, 20:07 (Ref:3766377) | #180 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
|||
|
12 Sep 2017, 20:31 (Ref:3766384) | #181 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
The class is a good basic concept and it works good enough because they (Trans-Am) seems to get enough of them to run. They are about $120K complete and are pretty durable due to be a tube frame and using 15" NASCAR wheels, 4 speed NASCAR transmission, along with a sealed motor. They race them in the NA, Europe, Australia, Asia and in the Dominican Republic. Great for a club guy who can run it in GT2 and do a TA here and there. In the end, they hold their value much better than proper racecars because they have a life once you are done running it as opposed to proper cars that mostly sit in a garage. If you are creative and want to do endurance club events, they work for that too. Slam it into a wall and for a few grand, cut off the tubes and put on new. Back to just like new, No retubbing required. Little downforce, no ABS, no TC and those 15" wheels means, you have to have talent behind the wheel to go fast. Technology won;t save you and downforce won't make you look like a pro out on the track. They only make around 500hp, so that's super easy and reliable for a LS motor, plus they even use fuel injection. |
||
|
12 Sep 2017, 23:33 (Ref:3766409) | #182 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
LOL
I was speaking to the winner of the TA class and after awhile said I always preferred prod. based cars. He said they are dangerous, so I told him they can be made safe. He gave me a grin and said, well, they are expensive. |
||
|
13 Sep 2017, 12:20 (Ref:3766520) | #183 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 337
|
When you are looking for value over a long period of time, you can't beat a tube frame car. Production cars have a limited lifespan but tube frame can go for years and years plus you can use different engines and bodies. They have their place in the market.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2018, 16:13 (Ref:3811961) | #184 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,649
|
|||
__________________
Nitropteron - Fly fast or get crushed! by NaBUrean Prodooktionz naburu38.itch.io |
30 Mar 2018, 17:03 (Ref:3811974) | #185 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
IMSA grew that way too. A Sedan/TA fit into GTO, the bigger SSCA production classes into GTO or GTU. They were field fillers, but you had big grids, which the spectators like. This iteration of TA puts large field of loud cars on track, squirming around with their limited traction, the driver wrestling the car around. Spectators like that kind of stuff. |
|||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
30 Mar 2018, 21:57 (Ref:3812036) | #186 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,101
|
I'll see how it is tomorrow, SVRA historics and Trans Am at Road Atlanta in 70 degree sunshine. Great spring day after great weather for Ferraris a couple weeks ago
Chris Dysonis running in TA as well, and Butch Lietzinger in the IGT class with a GT3 cup car. And HSR historics in a month, yup spring at Road Atlanta is looking good. |
|
|
30 Mar 2018, 23:02 (Ref:3812043) | #187 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
The historic stock car class at RA should be a hoot too. Have fun! |
|||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
31 Mar 2018, 00:45 (Ref:3812047) | #188 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,232
|
Bill Elliott is there but sadly I won't be
Stupid family commitments. *sigh* |
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
3 Apr 2018, 22:08 (Ref:3812690) | #189 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,618
|
That was a good event, I was really impressed. Trans Am cars are cool, even though they haven't changed a bit since I was knee high to a grasshopper, but TA2 is the future of that series. Terrific field of very well prepared cars that sound good and are plenty quick. They look great too.
Quote:
Quote:
Awesome Bill from Dawsonville. I have some pretty good photos from the event I will share as soon as I can edit them. |
||||
|
4 Apr 2018, 00:07 (Ref:3812703) | #190 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
But there's a few people close to the series who have some pretty good ideas for how to transform TA2 cars into the future of Trans Am, they just need an opportunity to present it to the powers that be. |
|||
|
4 Apr 2018, 21:57 (Ref:3812906) | #191 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,101
|
God I hope not, the TA class was a JOKE at Road Atlanta. Only 2 cars were competitive and they spun, Francis slowed to give the position back and still were well out in front going away.
That's not to say they (TA) aren't crazy cars, the "Caddy" the most of all, it looks like it was stepped on and stretched. It's not a bad thing, but definitely looks crazy. And their hips make the Z4 look like they aren't trying at BMW. But to me, the only race worth anything at Road Atlanta was the TA2. Was a great herd of cars bursting past and everyone was close the whole race. Even PT with a busted wing for half the race. |
|
|
5 Apr 2018, 18:38 (Ref:3813058) | #192 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 857
|
I'd like to see Trans Am go only TA2, get rid of the wing, put on a lip spoiler and have 50+ more HP and call it good
|
||
__________________
North American SportsCar |
5 Apr 2018, 19:56 (Ref:3813068) | #193 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
But they'd need more than that to really be able to take over as the headline class. The big problem with bumping TA2 up to headline quality is that they're heavier - about 300 pounds over the TA1 cars. And they're on spec chassis that were designed explicitly to produce cars that meet that weight minimum with minimal variance despite differing engines and bodies. There's more wiggle room for weight reduction on an LMP3 car, and nobody can seem to agree on how much weight could be removed from them. Here's the idea the guys I've talked to(who are actively working as mechanics on a full-time TA2 entry) feel need to be done to make TA2 ready to headline. 1: Two-inch wider tires. Wheel design can make it possible to fit these without having to change any suspensions components, though one would have to change for sure... 2: Upgraded shocks. The bulk of the suspension wouldn't necessarily HAVE to change, but to get the most out of the widened tires, better shocks would be a must. 3: TA1-spec splitter and wing. 4: Add not an extra 50, but an extra 150 horsepower. Despite being production-based, the engines in TA2 are extremely well-made, robust, and tuned well under what they're capable of - they only produce around 500 horsepower, and these guys figure you could squeeze out 700 or more before you induced major reliability problems, so 650 should be very easy. 5: A stronger rear differential and half-shafts to handle the power. These parts are the most common points of failure on current TA2 cars and would have to be upgraded if the engines were expected to give more power. They figure these changes would cover around 70-80% of the current performance gap between TA1 and TA2, while costing well under 70-80% of a current competitive TA1 budget - even if this did bump up the cost to current TA1 prices, the attractiveness of a car that's easily convertible between the two classes would likely induce additional interest regardless. As for getting rid of the wing, when I asked about that they pointed out that the wing design in TA1 was explicitly designed to produce similar downforce and drag to the old spoilers, so that'd be a purely aesthetic change. I'd still do it, personally, because I think TA needs to go back to branding itself as "stock car road racing" to help it's identity, and the going from the wing to a spoiler will help sell that identity. (yes, this is one of VERY VERY FEW instances where I think a purely aesthetic change is necessary - the fact that there's no performance effect if it's done right DOES enter into it) |
|||
|
5 Apr 2018, 20:16 (Ref:3813070) | #194 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,232
|
More horsepower + less downforce = a recipe for fun in most series.
|
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
5 Apr 2018, 20:56 (Ref:3813081) | #195 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
(The spoiler to wing proposal and the reasoning for it was allegedly made by Paul Gentilozzi, which will likely surprise no one) |
|||
|
5 Apr 2018, 20:59 (Ref:3813082) | #196 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,154
|
Don't change things for the sake of change.
Seems better to work on schedule stability (I am not criticizing their schedule, just speaking in general), cater to both teams and fans. |
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
5 Apr 2018, 21:41 (Ref:3813090) | #197 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 857
|
Fox, I am 100% on board with those proposed changes. The wing needs to go just strictly for aesthetics as you mentioned. That's good stuff
|
||
|
5 Apr 2018, 21:42 (Ref:3813091) | #198 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 857
|
|||
|
5 Apr 2018, 22:55 (Ref:3813102) | #199 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,232
|
|||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
6 Apr 2018, 00:39 (Ref:3813115) | #200 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
With the wing, I only support the change for the sake of series' identity, not aesthetics - I don't think it's that big a deal in that regard. It's a small thing in the big picture, but identity is important to selling a series. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 SCCA Pro Trans Am Series (50th Anniversary) | nasportscar | Sportscar & GT Racing | 59 | 22 Apr 2016 15:16 |
SCCA Trans-Am | Jonerz | Sportscar & GT Racing | 58 | 18 Dec 2008 01:16 |
SCCA and Trans-Am Racing, Llc Reach Agreement | The Snout | ChampCar World Series | 48 | 18 Feb 2004 23:31 |
SCCA and Trans-Am Racing, Llc Reach Agreement | Edmonton | Sportscar & GT Racing | 3 | 1 Feb 2004 05:31 |