|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Jun 2014, 13:45 (Ref:3418141) | #176 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
I'd move the Lotus to the bottom list and the Wolf to the 'maybe'. Is the Alpine actually homologated as a different car?
|
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
10 Jun 2014, 14:10 (Ref:3418157) | #177 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 664
|
Quote:
I've put the Wolf in the top group since Atlantic Racing Team and Liam Talbot Racing will be using the Wolf CN car in AsLMS. With both press releases talking about driving/racing/testing the Wolf LMP2 car later in the year. I thought the Alpine has a different homologation due to renaming the car/chassis. No other cars were ever renamed, only engines. So I'm not 100% sure about it. |
|||
|
10 Jun 2014, 14:15 (Ref:3418159) | #178 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,857
|
Will there be an LMP2 market in a few years time though? I dont see how allowing all pro line ups will increase car count when money is tight in the WEC anyway.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2014, 15:30 (Ref:3418185) | #179 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
The thinking is that there are more works drivers in P1 than in F1 at the moment, so they're trying to turn P2 into a GP2 formula, for young drivers with budgets but a future outside F1.
It's a gamble, for sure, but I'm guessing they've checked with the current teams. Of those current teams, SMP are all pros, Leventis has frequently raced in Pro categories before, KCMG are basically all pros and G-Drive had to recruit Julien Canal because they needed a silver driver, not because of the budget (as I understand it). Look at the two semi-works Ligier teams at Le Mans; both all-pro. Delta originally planned an all-pro lineup with Johansson as the 'silver' too. If they keep the 4 P1 manufacturers for next year then I'd say it's a risk they can afford, although it might make LM a little less enticing for some of the ELMS teams. |
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
10 Jun 2014, 15:51 (Ref:3418193) | #180 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
This move also makes it much more likely that FIA/ACO and TUSC will agree to a common framework for P2s from 2017 on as the commercial concept of the car in WEC and TUSC would now be much more similar. |
|||
__________________
“Sometimes there’s no poison like a dream.” — Tanya Donelly |
10 Jun 2014, 17:03 (Ref:3418230) | #181 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Finally. This drop of the driver categorizations in P2 is probably the best WEC related decision ACO has done during it's three year lifespan. See, you can do good when you try
|
|
|
10 Jun 2014, 18:23 (Ref:3418269) | #182 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 664
|
Increasing the price cap of the whole P2 package won't do any good for ELMS and AsLMS. Teams in those series rely heavily on drivers with money. A more expensive car means the teams need more money from the drivers. Combine that with the little chance ELMS and AsLMS teams will get to win Le Mans in P2 due to the FIA WEC (possibly) allowing all pro line-ups in P2, will likely result in an deflux of ELMS and AsLMS.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2014, 19:29 (Ref:3418294) | #183 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Whilst I've no doubt it will look a huge figure to me, I suspect in relation to race costs and factored in over a season or two or three it won't be colossal.
|
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
11 Jun 2014, 03:05 (Ref:3418396) | #184 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
How much will the price cap rise? What's the reason behind the change? Could it be just inflation related? The chassis manufacturers have to be able to make some money.
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 05:54 (Ref:3418409) | #185 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Coupes cost more money than open tops. And coupes are clearly the way ACO is pushing things forward
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 06:17 (Ref:3418414) | #186 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
||
|
11 Jun 2014, 07:37 (Ref:3418444) | #187 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,618
|
In the E-I interview, Pascal Vasselon was posed a question about lmp2 engines, looks like 2017 for that.
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 12:21 (Ref:3418532) | #188 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
One reason for raining cost cap is that a lot of P2s were sort of "cheated" past the cap because a lot of development was done on many chassis before the cap was instituted---same with engines.
Companies developing clean-sheet cars might be finding it very hard to do within the old cap. |
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 13:31 (Ref:3418556) | #189 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
https://twitter.com/ZytekMotorsport/...10502232772608
Next exciting next generation Zytek LMP Coupe Chassis is unveiled #Z16S It has Strakka Dome S103's handle grip!. |
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 13:35 (Ref:3418562) | #190 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
||
|
11 Jun 2014, 13:48 (Ref:3418564) | #191 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Why does it have a sun roof?
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 14:02 (Ref:3418572) | #192 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
According to http://sportscar365.com/industry/zyt...oupe-for-2016/ the car fits the LMP2 cost cap regulations, but the tub is LMP1 compliant.
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 14:17 (Ref:3418592) | #193 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
"According to http://sportscar365.com/industry/zyt...oupe-for-2016/ the car fits the LMP2 cost cap regulations, but the tub is LMP1 compliant."
... and there you have the perfect 2017 p1/P2 formula. |
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 15:14 (Ref:3418658) | #194 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
Great news!
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 15:37 (Ref:3418702) | #195 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Isn't that new Zytek LMP2/P1 car a little bit roomy for a prototype? The tip of the half-canopy windshield is closer to the front wheels.
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 16:12 (Ref:3418753) | #196 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Wirth's new HPD ARX-04b has the same sort of extended forward canopy---it could be the latest development in aero management, or just the best way to manage the new cockpit dimensions aero-efficiently.
|
|
|
11 Jun 2014, 16:18 (Ref:3418758) | #197 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jun 2014, 18:30 (Ref:3418836) | #198 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
Lol good one xD hahahah.
|
|
|
12 Jun 2014, 06:12 (Ref:3419056) | #199 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
C'mon, look at the bright side... At least it's road and consumer-legal appearance-wise when you put Ford Mustang bodywork on it.
|
|
|
12 Jun 2014, 11:29 (Ref:3419165) | #200 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
|
mustard bodywork on ford prutotip. so kool. viva dayton.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Judd LMP2 engine | Mike_Wooshy | Sportscar & GT Racing | 19 | 3 Feb 2011 22:21 |
New LMP2 engine - and (more) rule changes | ss_collins | Sportscar & GT Racing | 42 | 4 Oct 2008 14:49 |
Manufacturers propose new engine regs | Marbot | Formula One | 20 | 20 Oct 2007 12:17 |
LMP2 engine changes? (merged) | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 31 | 20 Jun 2006 10:20 |
Engine Suppliers Championship? | Mr V | Formula One | 4 | 29 May 2002 09:46 |