|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
14 Jun 2023, 20:31 (Ref:4163766) | #201 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,645
|
4mil, seems a bit of a bargain.
According to the grapevine, there's a number of residents who are no longer there to have an opinion. Somehow they've come into some money, and their properties have changed hands. |
||
|
14 Jun 2023, 22:17 (Ref:4163770) | #202 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 306
|
History repeats ...
|
||
|
15 Jul 2023, 01:23 (Ref:4168457) | #203 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,499
|
Work continues building Noise Abatement mounds etc...
|
||
__________________
The good old days sure seem like a long time ago!! |
2 Nov 2023, 22:19 (Ref:4184104) | #204 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,499
|
|||
__________________
The good old days sure seem like a long time ago!! |
3 Nov 2023, 01:49 (Ref:4184122) | #205 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 306
|
Thanks for posting that GTB.
I hope they have other plans for noise amelioration, those mounds look good but will do little beyond being spectator mounds. I suspect that the noise-related hype about the mounds is PR, and when there are noise complaints they can say 'hey, we did our best, and spent lots of $$ on those mounds', and then fall back on their policing of noise limits. I think I have seen something about buying them up neighbors, that works but there are obvious limits to that strategy (if in fact they are doing it). Managing noise is extremely difficult, just ask the road authorities about dealing with noise complaints from busy roads. However good intentions, good neighborhood relations, and demonstrably trying hard to control the noise goes a long way, and works to keep a decent balance between legitimate recreational activity and the neighbors' 'quiet enjoyment' of their rural ambience! |
||
|
3 Nov 2023, 22:08 (Ref:4184240) | #206 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,022
|
Quote:
You can always put even a steel fence on top of the mound, let alone a 5m tall concrete barrier for more effectiveness, but that might look ugly. Quote:
If you live on a busy road (directly) and have a 1.9m brick or concrete fence and double glazing on the forward facing windows (and insulation in the roof of course), you really should hear very little inside the house. When main urban roads are widened, they often provide solid fences (brick or concrete) for everyone who lives along the road and I see no reason why that shouldn't be very effective. A solid wall (or an earth mound) is an excellent noise barrier as far as I know, and creates a huge 'quiet' shadow region, no? Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 3 Nov 2023 at 22:17. |
|||
|
3 Nov 2023, 22:10 (Ref:4184241) | #207 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,632
|
I'm in the MX5 Club of NSW (got my ten year badge last week !) and Wakefield Park has been sorely missed by our club which is known for the extremely well run track days we used to have there at least 3 times a year.
I've had some great days at the track of highs and lows with chipping away at my lap times or having some decent offs when I pushed a little too hard and ran out of talent So I can't tell you how much I'm looking forward to this track reopening - also with the plans for a bidirectional layout we sort of get an extra track thrown in ! |
||
|
4 Nov 2023, 03:47 (Ref:4184269) | #208 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
Concrete (not steel unless thick) panels are effective when sealed/abutted (any gaps will have a disproportionate affect on sound leaking through). Mounds have limited effect, depending on how high they are. Double glazing also good, especially the modern glazing designed for that purpose, but again needs attention to the structure of the wall, and the sealing of gaps around the windows. Noise insulation in the roof space/ceiling also useful, especially if tin roof. Again mounds are of limited use for noise amelioration, be interesting to know before/after noise meter readings, given how quickly the new owners started work it's unlikely any scientific testing of noise levels was undertaken 'before', so comparison with 'after' readings will be seat-of-the-pants exercise. That's why I say they will focus on competitor noise limits and a restricted program (eg no drifting). Given the (apparent) intention to improve the circuit itself, and the spectator amenity, as the starting point, putting extra work into converting/maximising speccie mounds as noise barriers makes good tactical sense, back that up with stricter policing of competitor noise, and there appears to be the bones of a workable solution to the circuit's noise problems. Top that with targetted improvements to the homes of the main complainants and it is looking like maybe WP has a future after all. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Donington Park Pit Lane - Issues? | Sheila M | Historic Racing Today | 1 | 1 Apr 2006 00:14 |
Wakefield Park Meeting of Nov 17/18 | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 27 | 18 Oct 2001 13:37 |
CAMS Statement re Wakefield park and Legends Series | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 17 | 15 Aug 2001 11:43 |
Konica V8Supercars - Wakefield Park | elephino | Trackside | 26 | 25 Feb 2001 13:13 |