|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Jun 2004, 21:51 (Ref:994989) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 318
|
A closed LMP2?
Is there scope in the rules for such a machine?
bf1 |
||
|
5 Jun 2004, 22:07 (Ref:994998) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 399
|
Yes. http://www.lemans.org/univers_sport/...co_2004_gb.pdf
"1.1.1. - "LE MANS" PROTOTYPE category includes : a/ "LE MANS" PROTOTYPE 1 ("LM"P1) : open or closed (*) car. b/ "LE MANS" PROTOTYPE 2 ("LM"P2) : open or closed (*) car. (*) Closed car must have a windscreen and one door on each side ;" |
||
|
6 Jun 2004, 21:15 (Ref:995552) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 318
|
Thanks Patrick.I was just wondering the other day about a baby LMP GTP
Now how about ideas for one.. naturally a judd engine anyway or maybe something else.. Any other ideas? bf1 |
||
|
6 Jun 2004, 21:59 (Ref:995603) | #4 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Jun 2004, 22:44 (Ref:995629) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 318
|
Oh dear no all though its agood idea i would rather see something that looks like a LMP GTP not one of those disproportioned things
bf1 |
||
|
7 Jun 2004, 02:24 (Ref:995734) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
It's already a big weight problem on a 900 car. Although 750 isn't as bad as 675, I think it'd be hard to get such a car to the weight limit, or at least get enough ballast in, and it'd really mess up the CoG. Besides which, there's more frontal area, which would seem rather important in lower horsepower cars. It seems to me that LMP-2 hangs closer to drag on the downforce/efficency/drag scale than an LMP-1.
|
|
|
7 Jun 2004, 02:40 (Ref:995738) | #7 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 152
|
I doubt the DP would be compeitive in P2 and it also has the hurdle of crash testing by the ACO.
|
|
|
7 Jun 2004, 03:05 (Ref:995755) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 399
|
DP are to low to be legal in LMP2. DP's run a 1.5" ground clearance with a flat underbody. LMP2 ground clearance must be 3"(wild guess) along the sides and they have to run a concave underbody to hopefully keep them from flying...
Last edited by Patrick B; 7 Jun 2004 at 03:07. |
||
|
7 Jun 2004, 09:36 (Ref:995952) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 120
|
What is a DP ?
|
||
__________________
[FONT=Arial][COLOR=Navy]Le Mans ? only 30 years non-stop[/COLOR][/FONT] |
7 Jun 2004, 09:48 (Ref:995964) | #10 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,193
|
Daytona Prototypes.
I don't think it is practical to convert one to LMP, as Patrick B says. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
7 Jun 2004, 11:38 (Ref:996049) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
don't know if it was meant to be funny, though |
|||
__________________
bernard |
7 Jun 2004, 12:50 (Ref:996124) | #12 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
Oh Bernard !
Pounetbf, a DP is a Daytona Protoype... For DPs/GARRA fans : I assume this question was a real one. We're not accustomed to DPs in France... |
||
|
7 Jun 2004, 13:20 (Ref:996159) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
A couple of other places where it wouldn't work: -DP rear overhang is 32 to 34" (more than ACO's allowed 750 mm) -DP minimum height 41" (more than LMP maximum height 1030 mm) |
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lmp2 | gttouring | Sportscar & GT Racing | 16 | 23 Jun 2005 14:36 |
New Luchini LMP2, including new Cv0 LMP2 (merged threads) | veeten | Sportscar & GT Racing | 66 | 3 Sep 2004 05:27 |
35 Courage LMP2 | manager55 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 7 Jun 2004 20:29 |
The State of LMP2 | Tim Northcutt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 76 | 1 Jun 2004 20:37 |
LMP2 - New Group C2 | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 15 Dec 2003 13:50 |