|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Oct 2009, 19:32 (Ref:2557730) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Bin lids bin lids bin lids ... OUT OUT OUT!
http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headline...08094902.shtml
Bin lids! OUT! Bin lids! OUT! Bin lids, bin lids, bin lids! OUT OUT OUT! /me calms down ... Auto Motor und Sport are reporting that the teams have agreed to get rid of those infernal dustbin lids ... let's hope it actually happens. Might help overtaking, although I would agree with Sam Michael that it isn't a silver bullet. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
9 Oct 2009, 19:38 (Ref:2557734) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
|
That's good news. They do seem to add to the aero issues with regard to passing. And of course the well documented safey issues. With them gone and refuelling gone, the pit stops next year will be a lot simpler.
But quite apart from that - they look bloody awful. Every time I see them, I think of the dodgy bodywork fitted to "cars of the future" in sci-fi movies. |
|
|
9 Oct 2009, 19:42 (Ref:2557736) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,311
|
I can't think the wheel suppliers liked them much either. If I were Oz or BBS I would have been looking at the small print of their contracts very carefully.
I can't think they will "help" overtaking much at all. If anything, the only thing they were designed to do would be to reduce drag by a small amount, I don't think for a second that their removal will help the "racing" at all. |
||
|
9 Oct 2009, 19:49 (Ref:2557743) | #4 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
|
"Williams' technical chief Sam Michael said in July that studies have shown that the covers have "quite an adverse effect on the following car".
For now, until anyone here has done a more in depth investigation, I'm gonna go with Sam on this one... |
|
|
9 Oct 2009, 19:55 (Ref:2557751) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Don't they create large amounts of turbulence?
I think the best way of stopping these things would be to tweak the rules to ban a lot of this sillyness. One way of phrasing the rules could be as follows
The first clause would eliminate the DDDs as they use the crash structure. The second would stop any intentional aero-sabotage device. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
9 Oct 2009, 20:03 (Ref:2557759) | #6 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
|
There will be some obviously, but compared to a wheel... A rotating wheel is a hideously poor aerodynamic thing - it actually creates lift and a load of drag anyway. But hey - we can't ban wheels!
I agree with the ideas you're going with on other aero things. I'm quite new here, and I guess there will be an aero post someplace, but I have a load of ideas (based on experience) that I'd like to implement to liven things up, while still retaining F1's status at the top of the tree. |
|
|
9 Oct 2009, 20:38 (Ref:2557777) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 140
|
Anyone wanna bet they are cheering at Renault now?
|
||
__________________
"But wish no more; My life, you can take; To have her, please; Just one day wake" Gaeta's Lament, Bear McCreary |
9 Oct 2009, 20:52 (Ref:2557782) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
Best news I've heard all day.
Awful looking things. |
|
|
9 Oct 2009, 23:10 (Ref:2557877) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,647
|
Good. One less thing to come flying off a car.
|
||
|
9 Oct 2009, 23:17 (Ref:2557881) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 809
|
Thank God, we can finally see all of the car, and see the wheels and brake disks working in the slow-mo's. Now we just need to stop Renault and Red Bull putting the big flap on the back of the engine covers and the cars will look good again!
|
||
|
10 Oct 2009, 00:11 (Ref:2557903) | #11 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
This will be to do with the manner in which the covers direct outflowing air from the wheel through a small aperture, which has the effect of concentrating the airflow into a stream that has distinctly different characteristics from the surrounding air. Quote:
The issue Sam Michael refers to is that in reducing the overall drag outside AND inside the wheel, they produce an effect that produces a significantly negative result downstream, ie for the following car. The overall result of removing them should be that a following car might be able to get a tenth closer. Doesn't sound like much but may allow effective slipstreaming on a straight 80-100 metres shorter than at the moment. Again, doesn't sound like much but if you change it too much you've got something very different. BTW - I don't mind the fins on the spine of the red bull/renault, reminds me of the teapot intakes of the early/mid 70's.... Last edited by Malfunction Junction; 10 Oct 2009 at 00:13. Reason: clarity |
|||
__________________
david5: Just because something is popular, doesn't mean it's right, look at blowflies eating horse **** for instance. |
10 Oct 2009, 07:01 (Ref:2558013) | #12 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
|
They also work by channeling the flow between the upper and lower vortices that you get from a rotating wheel and (to an extent) stabilising those.
Also - remember before they were introduced, you'd often see brake dust being thrown quite a distance out from each front wheel? Well, that shows that the flow from the brake exit (bearing in mind the heat being produced) was directed out - perpendicular to the free stream and direction of travel. This also produces drag. What the bin-lids did was direct this flow from the brake exits and wheels (which is always there, even when the brake dust wasn't highlighting it) more rearwards, hence reducing drag. Of course, you can still see the brake dust going out sideways, but it's less than before and crucially - further from the car by the time it's diffused away. What I was getting at was that obviously Sam and others at Williams have conducted an in depth investigation in the effects of this to a following car - and I, for one, would like to see the results... except it's all academic now, as they've gone from next year. Now - we can see brake glow again. I always liked that. |
|
__________________
"I got one thing to say to all these would-be race car drivers. You shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house, and if you got a glass jaw, then you should watch your mouth" - Paul Tracy. |
10 Oct 2009, 12:06 (Ref:2558151) | #13 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
There's nothing new that we like... the old way is always better.
Back to 70s ! |
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
10 Oct 2009, 13:20 (Ref:2558173) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Oct 2009, 14:15 (Ref:2558194) | #15 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
||
|
10 Oct 2009, 15:52 (Ref:2558227) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
If they could just build a F1 car that looks like my avatar, I would be more than happy!
|
||
|
10 Oct 2009, 16:47 (Ref:2558247) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,010
|
I quite liked them, reminded me of the covered rear wheels of the GrC cars of the 80's. I won't particularly miss them though. Ta ta!
|
||
__________________
Keep living the dream! |
10 Oct 2009, 17:04 (Ref:2558260) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,575
|
I personally will miss the wheel covers.
When they first appeared, I thought that it was a refreshing take on an aero feature. |
||
__________________
"When you’re just too socially awkward for real life, Ten-Tenths welcomes you with open arms. Everyone has me figured out, which makes it super easy for me." |
10 Oct 2009, 21:32 (Ref:2558407) | #19 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,192
|
These were a crime against humanity. Oh, sorry, wrong thread.
Anyway, interesting pieces of kit, but I'll get over the loss of them. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Oct 2009, 22:19 (Ref:2558449) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,311
|
They should have been banned when they were first introduced.
|
||
|
11 Oct 2009, 22:22 (Ref:2559246) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
In principle, I didn't mind them - F1 used to be about innovative solutions, and this was one. For safety reasons, I don't mind banning them though, and if it helps overtaking that's good too.
|
|
|
11 Oct 2009, 23:55 (Ref:2559320) | #22 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Yes,I'm glad to see the back of'em,but if it were ever discovered that sticking a minature figurine of Max Mosley on the nose cone of an F1 car made it go a tenth of a second a lap faster,then don't be surprised to see them putting in an appearance.
|
|
|
12 Oct 2009, 01:01 (Ref:2559358) | #23 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,858
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
12 Oct 2009, 07:03 (Ref:2559503) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
|||
|
12 Oct 2009, 12:12 (Ref:2559706) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 758
|
I don't mind them but also am quite happy to see them go.
But if they offer enough aero benefit, what is to stop the wheel manufacturers developing a wheel with a much more flush outer face to compensate them being banned next year? |
||
__________________
Madness is a normal condition interupted only by spells of sanity. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New bit on lids? | BillyT | Kart Racing | 10 | 27 Jul 2005 23:30 |
SKID LIDS | marcus | Racers Forum | 4 | 10 Apr 2000 17:50 |