Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 Sep 2002, 23:28 (Ref:372611)   #1
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Two Things

1. Reading in MN today that they want to bring VS body shells into the Commodore Cup. FFS! What a crock!! We already have Future/Auscar/New Millenium/Bathurst/Junior/Procar Tourers, Saloon Cars, the Konica Series, Improved Production etc. I hope somebody pulls their head in before it falls off...

2. Something a bit more positive, apparently a model car manufacturer is bringing out a heap of V8 BRute models... that'd be interesting!
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 06:29 (Ref:372733)   #2
wishbone
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
Queensland
Posts: 155
wishbone should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Avesco Need a Market for all of the VS's out there ans commodore cup would be a good place.

Problem is Avesco dosn't conrol the commodroe cup.

With the Konica cars i belive needing to updated to VT or AU Shells for next year, and no other body shells are allowed.the main V8 players are going to the new body shapes for next year as well, so avesco have set it up so that the koinca boys have to buy all of the current cars. and as a result will have cars that can't be raced except in the Sports Sedans
wishbone is offline  
__________________
The world Spins And so does Life
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 06:59 (Ref:372751)   #3
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Somebody correct me but I thought the idea of Konica's was for cars with outdated body shells from the main stream races?
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 07:10 (Ref:372763)   #4
Flaggie
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location:
Australia
Posts: 344
Flaggie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It is, Racey. As I understood it the VS Commy's gone for next season, on an eligibity level. Hence all Holdens will be Vt's or VX's. I had been led to believe the EL was still ok for Konica 2003, though, but it was verboten for 2004.

As for Commy Cup, yep, that's right. Unsure whether this is a CAMS initiative, or whether it's coming from the Association their selves. Given CAMS wanting to try and nix HQ's and Vees, and generally modernise classes, I'd tend to think there may be some pressure from that way.
Flaggie is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 07:16 (Ref:372767)   #5
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well they have well and truly lost out on Formula Vee - they announced recently that the 1600cc motor is eligible for F/Vee from next year - in fact we have allocated lap records for both 1192 and 1600cc motors at Wakefield.
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 07:34 (Ref:372776)   #6
Seton_5
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Melbourne
Posts: 164
Seton_5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yeah from what i've read No VS for the Konica's beyond 2002 or 2003 but they on the way out Also the EL falcoon out too. Commodore Cup would be a great place for all the VS's to run around in
Seton_5 is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 11:33 (Ref:372937)   #7
The Tool Man
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Brisbane Queensland
Posts: 1,540
The Tool Man should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think the Model Car manufacturer is Southern Model Supplies who also do the Classic Carlectable Range
The Tool Man is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 11:59 (Ref:372959)   #8
Airhead
Veteran
 
Airhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 3,366
Airhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAirhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Surely the thing with the feeder formulae, is the consistency of the regulations. So that if I wanted to race HQ's or Commodore Cup I could buy a car drive it around for two seasons, get a more affluent sponsor into Konica Series and sell my car to the next hopeful.

This is hard to do if it is suddenly outdated.
Airhead is offline  
__________________
I am grateful that I am not as judgemental as all those censorious, self-righteous people around me.
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 12:01 (Ref:372962)   #9
Airhead
Veteran
 
Airhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 3,366
Airhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAirhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
My next thought is, for the better financed teams, why not pull the good mechanicals out of the car. The bits that are replaced with race miles, then scrap the rest.

How many good VS and EL race cars are there left now?
Airhead is offline  
__________________
I am grateful that I am not as judgemental as all those censorious, self-righteous people around me.
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 13:05 (Ref:373012)   #10
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Errrm, I'd hate to see a Supercar VS in the Commodore Cup... what do you do with them? Turn them all into drive school cars?

FVee- apparently that PR re-1600cc engines went off a bit half cocked... I don't think there are too many happy people around the place, except for NSW...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 22:13 (Ref:373352)   #11
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Maybe but a decision has been made and announced - now it's up to the FVee Assoc's to do something positive instead of whinging all the time.
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 22:55 (Ref:373376)   #12
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
What can they do to get back those competitors who have already decided that they've had a gutfull? For a lot of competitors, FVee is a very cost affective way of going racing, but not too many people are looking forward to spending all of this money etc for not much gain...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 23:02 (Ref:373380)   #13
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
However aren't you forgetting one thing? The fact that the engines they are currently using are becoming harder and more expensive to maintain because they are no longer readily available...
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Sep 2002, 23:13 (Ref:373384)   #14
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
There's that too, but Joe blow who gets 4 years out of an engine won't be too happy. Despite all of the fors and againsts, this idea was only supposed to be implemented in NSW, where they are much more pro-1600 than elsewhere. Besides, why does CAMS want to kill FVee? Maybe if they rebadged the cars Commodores or Falcons they might be a chance?
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 01:23 (Ref:373478)   #15
Flaggie
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location:
Australia
Posts: 344
Flaggie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A Supercar couldnt run in the Commy Cup anyway. Commy Cup have 4.2 Litres and a controlled suspension package, aero and gearbox. you could score an ex supercar shell maybe, caged and ready to go and make a Commy Cup car out of it.

As for 1600 Vees. Victoria are unlikely to have anyone running them next year anyway.

And who's idea was it to come up with a HQ class with 253's and disc brakes???
Flaggie is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 01:52 (Ref:373493)   #16
RaceTime
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,449
RaceTime should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Crash - I think the point lately has been that the engines, whilst previously lasting 4 years, now weren't and, when ready for rebuilds, were starting to become horrendously expensive IF parts were available.
RaceTime is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 02:16 (Ref:373499)   #17
sevi
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location:
brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,049
sevi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sorry to disagree Crashy, but AFAIK the VS is still eligable for next season in the Konica's.
sevi is offline  
__________________
The legal fraternity, proudly supported by V8 Supercars!
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 05:30 (Ref:373522)   #18
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think the VS is only banned from the 'main' series (what else can we call it), does the same apply for the EL?
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 06:43 (Ref:373540)   #19
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Sevi- I won't disagree with you there, just going by what the above folk have said

Flaggie- HQs- hrrmmmm, that's another 'don't go there' subject... that upset a lot of people at the Power Tour meeting up here earlier in the year...

RT- I won't disagree with you there, talking to some old timers, one of whom got 5 years out of an engine, but there was a guy running around who blew an engine at most race meetings...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 5 Sep 2002, 11:33 (Ref:373689)   #20
Elwood
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Australia
Melbourne VIC
Posts: 35
Elwood should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by AMoffat
Surely the thing with the feeder formulae, is the consistency of the regulations. So that if I wanted to race HQ's or Commodore Cup I could buy a car drive it around for two seasons.....This is hard to do if it is suddenly outdated.
The Commodore Cup rules have been virtually the same (other than a few necessary changes along the way to solve problems as they arose...eg gearbox durability etc.) since 1994.... I think that could be defined as fairly consistent.

At the AGM of the Commodore Racing Association in Melbourne last night the competitors agreed in principle to moving forward with the body update, subject to CAMS approval (they are fronting CAMS with the proposal next week) and also to the update cost being acceptable once they finish building the prototype car.

And nothing's being "suddenly outdated" - the VR's are due to be eligible from Jan 2004, and at this stage the current VB-VH models will be eligible to run until the end of 2006, with that to be extended year by year if there are still sufficient cars running - with no fixed expiry date on that arrangement.

The basis of the update is to replace ONLY the body shell and any components that "just won't fit". The big ticket stuff will all be carried over - such as engine, gearbox, diff, fuel cell etc.

Just on the VS Supercar idea - no go... the Supercars run the a full trailing arm rear end and bar-work which far exceeds what is permitted for Commodore Cup. The Commodore Cup shell is fairly close to standard (ie. suspension pickup points etc) with no bar-work permitted outside the cockpit. Assume that this will still be the case for the VS.

The stated reason for the update was both in response to CAMS' attitude to 'ageing' classes in recent years, and also to sponsor & competitor supoort/pressure for a freshen-up....the class will be 10 years old by the time the new cars hit the track.

Last edited by Elwood; 5 Sep 2002 at 11:36.
Elwood is offline  
__________________
"I couldn't repair your brakes...so I made your horn louder"....Steven Wright
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Way I See Things macdaddy ChampCar World Series 21 9 Feb 2003 22:33
2 things in gpl gttouring Virtual Racers 4 26 Jan 2003 19:29
QLD V8 Things Crash Test Australasian Touring Cars. 11 28 Nov 2002 23:14
of all the things to come across....... marcus Formula One 4 5 Oct 2000 01:43


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.