|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Jan 2013, 11:04 (Ref:3192117) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Warwick asks for Government funds
http://www.pitpass.com/48240-Warwick...rnment-funding
Rarely have I seen a better example of how out of touch, incredibly insensitive and just hopelessly living in a dream world the BRDC has become. The very thought of taxpayers funding the careers of racing drivers who, at the very first paycheque, take themselves out of the UK tax jurisdiction to live abroad in luxury is not only daft but downright offensive. If Warwick and his pals really do want to do something about the underfunding of British F1 prospects (and they should!) then they have it within the realms of their own bank accounts to make a difference. Apart from sponsoring their own sons or daughters however, they choose to do nothing. No surprise really. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 11:32 (Ref:3192125) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Well, he is head of the BRDC and 'D' is for 'drivers'. He'd be remiss in his role if he didn't have a crack at some public funding. Whether the authorities should entertain his appeal is a completely different question.
|
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
21 Jan 2013, 12:04 (Ref:3192140) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,278
|
When there are increasing numbers drivers resorting to sites like GoFundMe in order to raise funds to complete a season by having their fans chip in, I think DW's comments have some merit. He's not talking about funding JB & co in F1, but the fact that people with massive talent at the bottom of the racing ladder all too often get zero support.
Certain other sports are having a lot of cash invested in them - in part because of the groundswell of public support after the Olympics. Would be nice if some money was made available to young drivers to allow them to fulfil their potential. It's a perfectly fair comparison, in my opinion. |
|
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
21 Jan 2013, 12:13 (Ref:3192142) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
How on earth should acquiring public funding possibly be part of his agenda? Or should everything run by the richest in society that then fails be publicly funded now? It's just a complete lack of imagination and leadership, that's all. |
|||
|
21 Jan 2013, 12:53 (Ref:3192164) | #5 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I just feel sorry for the drivers with natural talent that can't even afford to go karting. At what point do we start 'funding' young drivers? After Daddy has paid for them to go karting, or before?
|
|
|
21 Jan 2013, 13:01 (Ref:3192168) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
I don't deny any private group to lay out their stall in request for public funds. What merits scrutiny is the manner in which public authorities assess such applications. Now whether the BRDC have been remiss in hunting for private finance has not been established to my satisfaction. There maybe be merit in that criticism but applying for public funds is very reasonably within his remit as representative of his interest group. |
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
21 Jan 2013, 13:08 (Ref:3192171) | #7 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,950
|
I see nothing wrong with it at all, personally. No different to any other sportsmen or women. The assumption that everyone involved in motor racing is rich is somewhat flawed, I think.....
|
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 13:42 (Ref:3192190) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,214
|
Perception is key here - how many people regard motor racing as sport these days?
Whereas cycling, swimming, athletics are seen as core sports that derive a range of benefits and encompass team sports and have fitness and health benefits that can filter down to grass roots clubs, schools, etc. I doubt that much UK government money would ever go into funding drivers, believing that there is plenty of money within the motor and motor racing industry to fund drivers if they wanted to. |
|
|
21 Jan 2013, 14:33 (Ref:3192213) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
Quote:
|
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 14:39 (Ref:3192225) | #10 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
Where does the problem actually lie? |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 14:40 (Ref:3192226) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
Marussia's problem originates in the shelving of the 'budget cap'.
|
|
|
21 Jan 2013, 15:06 (Ref:3192239) | #12 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/2...or-budget-cap/ Mercedes too! http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/m...092544561.html We need to get back to why Derek Warwick feels that the government should be funding young drivers, and sharpish! |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 15:21 (Ref:3192251) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,821
|
|||
__________________
a salary slave no more... |
21 Jan 2013, 15:30 (Ref:3192254) | #14 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I don't think that Ecclestone is solely responsible for the lack of driver funding at all levels in motorsport. He just doesn't have that much influence. Car manufacturers have far more influence over that than Ecclestone does, and it's not something that is just happening in FIA sanctioned series, either. If you look at the series run in the US, they have just the same sorts of problems there.
Edit: We should also point out that it's not Ecclestone who is actually holding all of the cards with regard to the ownership of F1. That's CVC, and they will no doubt be all too ready to point out that they are not a charity. Last edited by Marbot; 21 Jan 2013 at 15:41. |
|
|
21 Jan 2013, 16:04 (Ref:3192272) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,753
|
I can see where Warwick is coming from in this to some extent. the problem is where and how.
I see no harm in a teenage Karting champion going to Sport Scotland/ Sport England/ Sport Wales /Sport Northern Ireland and saying ... Look I've (my family and friends) have funded me to to a championship, I'm looking to step up a class, but that doesn't just require new Kit, but I need to improve my own fitness etc. Can I have some money towards my current Gym membership... that in turn will free my own money up for an engine upgrade/ extra set of tyres for the upcoming season. The Sports Authority need not give direct cash that could be used for anything, but hand the karter a local authority gym membership card valid for a year. Finding some way to implement something similar for a clubbie racer, who is happy driving in their class year in year out is the difficult part. Government or lottery funding for Silverstone is a different question and set of arguments altogether. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 16:47 (Ref:3192287) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
I've got an idea, and I bet this would get government approval...
Before petitioning Parliament for a handout of taxpayer funds from the public purse for his new driver scheme why doesn't Warwick first pass the hat around his own members who have benefited so much from tax-except status by living abroad over the years? Let's think. There's currently Hamilton, Button, DiResta, Coulthard, along with JYS and Mansell who might chip in along with former President Damon who escaped to Ireland for a few years and of course Warwick himself who seemed to enjoy the air in the Channel Islands once the paycheques started rolling in.... Seriously, I've never heard such a crass idea from the BRDC in my life. Warwick is delusional and is harming the very image of the sport by opening his mouth in this way. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 16:50 (Ref:3192288) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
There's imaginative solutions that are possible off the top of my head. There could be a commitment to match commercial funds with public funds 50:50 or some other ratio to a couple of select drivers. You could rope a driver into road safety campaigns and if he hits the Hambo big league; he pays the money back. Maybe policy makers should refuse even that, I don't know. What I do know is that Warwick is fully justified in rolling out his stall for public money and if he refused even to look at that option he would be significantly remiss in his job. |
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
21 Jan 2013, 16:52 (Ref:3192289) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
As for Eccelstone, I remember his disrespect towards the marshals. I doubt he gives a jot for young drivers starting out. I don't think Warwick and him get on either.
|
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
21 Jan 2013, 16:54 (Ref:3192292) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,278
|
No funding, to my knowledge, is offered to athletes who are not developing (the "happy driving in their class year in year out" scenario).
Public funding is offered to those who are developing towards an "elite" level - national or international - based on strict criteria being met. There were plenty of sob stories prior to (and after) the Olympics of sports men and women losing their funding because they, or their sport as a whole, hadn't met the previously agreed standard. So... how do young drivers (in karts, or their first couple of seasons) get identified as possibly having what it takes? That's what the MSA are doing already with their Academy drivers, what the RSF are doing, and what the BRDC themselves are doing with the Rising Stars programme. None of those programmes are rolling in cash, but they open doors to the wider motorsport world via sponsor opportunities and wider exposure. Perhaps if DW had worded his statement differently opinions would be different? "We'd like some help with the BRDC Rising Stars programme to ensure we give junior drivers the best progression to international level that we can" is somewhat more positive, isn't it? Interestingly, one thing the motorsport world in the UK always brings up is the number of jobs created and amount of money brought in by the UK being the centre of the world's motorsport industry. That being so, any cap-in-hand approach at a national level is almost certain to be pilloried (rightly or wrongly) because the perception is that motorsport looks after itself, money is swilling around etc etc. Only it isn't. We might be very good at engineering cars, producing simulators and so on but the money involved in those fields stays in those fields. Wording aside, and Silverstone itself aside, I think DW is simply putting into words what a lot of young drivers and their families are feeling right now. It will be interesting to see how many of them stop driving and take up competitive cycling in the next 12 months, won't it? |
|
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
21 Jan 2013, 17:13 (Ref:3192298) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,984
|
its interesting that in this thread its ridiculous that gov't would spend public money on talented kids in motor sport and in the Glock thread its ridiculous that talented drivers are getting replaced by drivers who have private money.
obviously its not this simple but private money is used to achieve different goals to that of public money being spent. private capital is used to derive satisfaction for its owners (rich guy wants his kid to be in F1) where as public money would be spent on trying to find the best kid to give a chance too. which approach do you think will yield the more competitive and/or interesting field? personally i dont think gov't subsidizing/giving tax breaks too/ funding etc sports at every level is ridiculous at all. if anything they should be spending more money on it not less. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 17:14 (Ref:3192300) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
I don't think many people would disagree with the idea that motor sport in general has a real problem with identifying and nurturing talent from other than seriously wealthy backgrounds. That alone is why it is considered a sport for the rich.
It is simply not within the realms of possibility for a talented child from a working class family to ascend the ladder to F1. Buying a bike is probably a far better option. Warwick's plan however is naive. It is born of a person who doesn't understand politics, probably hasn't noticed the country is in a recession, and has no idea how his statement looks to the outside world who he wishes to fund his ideas. Given that politicians start worrying about their re-election the moment they take office, and giving public money to a club whose most famous members live in tax-exile may not help them reach that goal, I would say this has a zero chance of gaining any support at all. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 17:16 (Ref:3192301) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
Quote:
|
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 17:25 (Ref:3192305) | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,278
|
It depends...
Tricky. |
|
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
21 Jan 2013, 17:55 (Ref:3192333) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,214
|
Quote:
There is also no wider national 'team' per se - athletes win individual medals for themselves but are seen to win for, and represent, their country. Of course A1GP tried the national team route for their format which didn't galvanise much support - but that is a different story. |
||
|
21 Jan 2013, 18:03 (Ref:3192340) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
The GP track is the industry, the tourism industry
The drivers are the sport. The engineering is the industry. IMO. --- Bar a few broad details I don't think Warwick has outlined his plan. I'd try to set the agenda with the media. Get a coherent public-private proposal drawn up and upload it as a pdf for all to see. Do a press conference for the trade media and the broader media. I don't think Warwick has interacted with the press very well and the article is sleepily written, pit-pass typical. He comes across as moaning and whining. He should be proactive and present a positive case as to why he merits public money. |
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is HRT short of Funds?? | billy bigtime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 46 | 1 May 2005 10:57 |
Prize Funds | Walshy | National & International Single Seaters | 9 | 5 May 2004 23:02 |
A novice asks........ | TuscanR | Motorsport Art & Photography | 23 | 2 Apr 2004 21:41 |
Two asks | Dynojet | Sportscar & GT Racing | 1 | 8 Jan 2003 14:50 |
Some teams getting some Sponsor funds from NASCAR | Flintstone Flyer | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 14 | 22 Mar 2002 00:54 |