|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Oct 2006, 09:18 (Ref:1750847) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,686
|
Sandwich plate or remote filter?
Which one would you use and why?
I know that the accepted practice is to use a remote filter on a dry sump system but it seems to add to complexity, cost and weight for no additional benefit. Am I missing something? For info I don't have any installation issues either way. Thanks. |
||
|
27 Oct 2006, 10:40 (Ref:1750917) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,718
|
sandwich plate for me, a remote filter would enable me to run a larger filter I guess, and therefore slightly higher capacity, but not sure if it would do me any favours.
|
|
|
27 Oct 2006, 11:58 (Ref:1750976) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I have one set up on one car and one on the other and see no difference except I can run a big cheaper Ford filter on the remote one than the chevy one on the other, the remote is also easier to get at. Both were supplied by Think Automotive and I just used them as I happened to have them lying around (tight wad!). I guess the plumbing was slightly easier on the sandwich plate and also meant no need for a 90 degree bend into the adabtor so may actually have had the slim advantage.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
27 Oct 2006, 12:43 (Ref:1751020) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,853
|
Some thing to consider, do you need extra oil capacity, always a good thing on a race engine,Like some free extra oil cooling ,mounted in a suitable area you can gain a fair bit .Downsides, some enginebays are pigs to find the room needed for remote mountings ,the cost can rocket with the fittings sometimes required.
|
||
__________________
Living the dream,Chief instruktor and racing on the worlds best circuits-The Nordschleife and Spa.Getting to drive the worlds best cars-someone has to do it, so glad its me. |
27 Oct 2006, 13:05 (Ref:1751060) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
There are some articles I have read that state extra oil aids nothing in the cooling stakes, just takes a tad longer to heat up and cool down and once up to temp you can have a 50 gallon can in the back it will make no odds, nothing beats a good oil cooling system. The main reason for having a deep sump for example in a small block chevy wet sump motor is not to fill the thing with an extra 3 or 4 litres of oil it would accomadate if filled up to the full mark on the dipstick but to run it low with just a tad more oil than normal but run it lower away from the crank.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
30 Oct 2006, 08:33 (Ref:1753344) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,686
|
I took my sandwich plate off, looked at it carefully and came to the conclusion it was designed by a moron.
Half the holes don't line up and there are sharp edges everywhere. One hole is blocked with a very heavy steel plug. The other hole has a steel fitting (1/2" BSP to -10) that has the smallest bore I have ever seen, even my ally ones are thinner! Coupled with the proximity to the exhaust I think it is probably going to have to go, or at least be re-engineered. |
||
|
30 Oct 2006, 12:32 (Ref:1753530) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,718
|
I've seen good and bad sandwich plates, my system seems ok so I have no plans to change it.
I have been thinking about extending my sump |
|
|
31 Oct 2006, 18:33 (Ref:1754615) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
ive stuck with a sandwich plate but i did get the die grinder on it and flow it to loose all the nasty sharp edges to the oil ways
|
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
1 Nov 2006, 19:46 (Ref:1755591) | #9 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,479
|
I started with a Mocal sandwich plate and the machining wasn't that good. An hour with a die grinder improved all the flow paths and it worked fine for quite a while. It's eventual demise was because it became increasingly difficult to get a seal on both sides without having to really wind up the oil filter. In the end I just drilled and tapped two large holes straight into the oil filter housing, fitted oil line fittings, and blocked off the standard internal passageway. Means I can use a remote cooler but with the standard spin on filter... works fine so far :-)
|
||
|
5 Nov 2006, 19:48 (Ref:1758454) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
The issue of making the filter accessible, and bigger, is the one I'd go for.
With my FWD Poxhall, the filter is behind the 4-1 manifold which I'm sure picks up heat from the header tubes. Were the enough space under the bonnet, I'd be tempted to run a remote filter, even with the conventional oil pump. Denis, have you sorted an oil tank yet? One question - how many put the coolers in the pressure line, or in the return line? I have mine in the return, which leaves it less likely to burst under pressure. Rob. |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
6 Nov 2006, 08:34 (Ref:1758757) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,686
|
Quote:
I have been recommended to fit the oil cooler on the return (one of them, I have both scavenge stages on seperate pipework). As I have a proper fabricated cooler I doubt if pressure would be a problem. I am looking at it more from keeping the pressure route as simple, direct and non-cavitating as possible. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi particulate filter | zac510 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 8 | 29 Jun 2006 09:15 |
Best filter makes and types? | C.U.Motorsport | Motorsport Art & Photography | 5 | 20 Feb 2006 15:50 |
There's a hole in my filter.... | Bluebottle | Road Car Forum | 4 | 6 Aug 2003 22:05 |