|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 00:14 (Ref:1008368)
|
#1 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 404
 |
Jags Top Speeds...
depressingly slow again...
|
||
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 00:40 (Ref:1008380)
|
#2 | ||
|
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
speed trap figures ?
|
||
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 12:09 (Ref:1008619)
|
#3 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 404
|
yep... from www.formula1.com for Fridays practice. Fisi must have got a runup out of the carpark!
Pos/Car/Driver/TimeOfDay/Speed 1 11 Giancarlo Fisichella 14:37:22 347.9 2 38 Ricardo Zonta 15:02:22 345.8 3 12 Felipe Massa 14:35:54 345.7 4 6 Kimi Räikkönen 14:28:56 345.4 5 35 Anthony Davidson 15:02:25 345.2 6 16 Cristiano da Matta 14:38:32 345.1 7 3 Juan Pablo Montoya 14:35:55 345.0 8 9 Jenson Button 14:58:55 344.8 9 4 Ralf Schumacher 14:31:40 344.0 10 2 Rubens Barrichello 14:31:24 343.2 11 17 Olivier Panis 14:38:33 342.9 12 10 Takuma Sato 14:11:59 342.0 13 37 Bjorn Wirdheim 14:48:56 342.0 14 5 David Coulthard 14:03:48 341.0 15 1 Michael Schumacher 14:39:54 340.8 16 39 Timo Glock 14:35:57 339.7 17 18 Nick Heidfeld 14:48:03 339.1 18 15 Christian Klien 14:33:22 337.9 19 7 Jarno Trulli 14:56:40 337.5 20 8 Fernando Alonso 14:04:04 336.0 21 19 Giorgio Pantano 14:40:13 335.5 22 14 Mark Webber 14:30:15 335.2 23 20 Gianmaria Bruni 14:45:03 333.4 24 21 Zsolt Baumgartner 14:26:43 330.1 25 40 Bas Leinders 14:04:25 327.9 |
||
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 12:16 (Ref:1008622)
|
#4 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,534
|
Nope, just optimised for the straight, not the twisties.
|
||
|
|
__________________
Mos Eisley spaceport, A more wretched hive of scum and villiany you will not find anywhere in the galaxy, we must be careful.
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 13:05 (Ref:1008650)
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
You'll tend to see a bigger spread of straight-line speeds here than at any other track on the calendar.
Mainly due, of course, to the choice of going low downforce and quick on the straight, or higher downforce for the infield. |
|
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 13:48 (Ref:1008671)
|
#6 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,135
|
Interesting to see both Saubers so high on that list. The Toyotas seem to be fairing quite well as well. Who else was surprised to see a Mercedes engine 4th?
|
||
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 14:02 (Ref:1008675)
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Raikkonen was experimenting with VERY low downforce to cope with the down on power Merc engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 15:06 (Ref:1008693)
|
#8 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Well, Mark is supposed to have an exclusive new improved updated engine in his Jaguar compared to the old block in Klien's car, so i would expect his car to be quicker...?
|
||
|
|
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 15:42 (Ref:1008711)
|
#9 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
Guys I would not worry too much about top speeds. Trimming off wing will give more on top speeds than will an improvement in hp. What is concerning is that they are not any faster in the slower parts of the track. The low top speeds tell me that they are running more wing. The car is obviously hard to drive, or to set up as evidenced by his off, again.
Look at the company that surrounds Webbers top speeds, eg. Sato who was third. Speeds Last edited by neilap; 19 Jun 2004 at 15:46. |
||
|
|
__________________
Eventually we learn
|
|
19 Jun 2004, 16:09 (Ref:1008721)
|
#10 | ||
|
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
Sauber having the Ferrari power are always likely to feauture in the top half when it comes to top speeds but i guess BMW and MERC will be saving their engines as the last sector is quite harsh on engines
|
||
|
|
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off."
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 02:00 (Ref:1009110)
|
#11 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
More than 340kmh for JPM in Qualifyings...BMW is definetly not short on grunt
|
||
|
|
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 05:44 (Ref:1009148)
|
#12 | ||
 Race Official1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,521
 |
But its not just power determining the speed trap numbers, having the aerodynamics of a housebrick like a 2004 Minardi will need 1,000bhp to overcome....
|
||
|
|
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME!
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 08:53 (Ref:1009204)
|
#13 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Yeah..Ferrari seem to run a decent amount of downforce to be fast in the straight yet respectable in the in-fields..
|
||
|
|
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 10:06 (Ref:1009238)
|
#14 | ||
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 43
|
Yeh, as for the new and improved engine for Mark, he's slowest out of all 3 drivers. (Jag)
|
||
|
|
__________________
"The wanted to fight to the death, we accommodated them"
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 10:14 (Ref:1009247)
|
#15 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
Massa is the king of the hill .in terms of top speed ..
341.9 . +1.1 compared to JPM .. |
||
|
|
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 11:18 (Ref:1009300)
|
#16 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Let's hope he rememebrs to turn in afterwasrds, and doesn't have a suspension failure a lá Canada
|
||
|
|
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 12:26 (Ref:1009406)
|
#17 | ||
|
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
hardly Marks fault Boots
|
||
|
|
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 12:29 (Ref:1009410)
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
I think Boots was referring to Massa.
In any case it's a bit churlish. |
|
|
|
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 12:36 (Ref:1009418)
|
#19 | |||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man!
|
|
20 Jun 2004, 16:07 (Ref:1009500)
|
#20 | ||
|
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,200
|
Now that sort of information is detailed! JPM wasn't that noticeable in S3.
|
||
|
|
__________________
Brum brum
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Group A TWR Jaguar XJS ETC cars | peter195001 | Motorsport History | 43 | 28 Aug 2014 14:30 |
| Is Webber deliberately hurting Jags? | freud | Formula One | 83 | 20 Jun 2004 11:18 |
| Oh dear me....../Jags and Gems (merged) | Knowlesy | Formula One | 48 | 21 May 2004 21:34 |
| Web Page with pictures on D-Type Jags' | jarama | Motorsport History | 2 | 1 Sep 2001 22:51 |
Linear Mode
