|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Who should have been given victory? | |||
Giancarlo Fisichella (Jordan) | 76 | 74.51% | |
Kimi Raikkonen (McLaren) | 26 | 25.49% | |
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
6 Apr 2003, 19:02 (Ref:560299) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 354
|
I Can't Believe It
That was really unfair on the Jordan team - they exploded with joy at having won, only to find out they counted back another lap and Raikkonen wins. I'm really disappointed. Who should have won in your opinion?
And poor Alonso - I hope he recovers soon. |
||
__________________
Why has my signature been deleted?!? [because you don't seem to understand "3 lines max" - Admin] [b][i]Sun is in the sky, oh why, oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?[/b][/i] |
6 Apr 2003, 19:05 (Ref:560304) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 104
|
Who should have won?
Martin Brundle (ITV UK Coverage) said that the positions are taken as they are when the leader crosses the line before the red flag.
We all found out about hte red falg about 10 seconds after Alonso crashed. This would indicate that Fisi should have won, as indicated by Martin Brundle. But I wonder if the red flag actually applies to the Jaguar incident, thus taking the order from when the leader last crossed the line before that? Iain |
||
__________________
Iain |
6 Apr 2003, 19:05 (Ref:560305) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Jordan should have won. This count back rule is stupid anyway, it was only introduced as a deterrent to people "causing" an accident (therefore a race stoppage) to gain an advantage, the Jordan was in the lead, he should have won the race, they were robbed.
|
||
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:06 (Ref:560308) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,413
|
I think the time of the incident counts......
|
||
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:06 (Ref:560309) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
I second that.
|
|
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:10 (Ref:560320) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 354
|
I'm also going to add this - the race can only be finished when it is past 75% race distance. These are the % of race distances for laps 53, 54 and 55:
53 = 74.64788732% 54 = 76.05633803% 55 = 77.46478873% So therefore, Jordan have won because lap 53 (which it was wound back to) is not 75% race distance. I hope Jordan bring this up in their protest... |
||
__________________
Why has my signature been deleted?!? [because you don't seem to understand "3 lines max" - Admin] [b][i]Sun is in the sky, oh why, oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?[/b][/i] |
6 Apr 2003, 19:11 (Ref:560325) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,168
|
bloody hell. Fisichella won that motor race. This is stupid.
|
||
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:11 (Ref:560327) | #8 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,306
|
Rules are rules. Despite being faster, the win goes to Kimi.
A better question is who deserves the win? |
||
__________________
Go Tribe!!!! |
6 Apr 2003, 19:12 (Ref:560329) | #9 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,208
|
It could well be 1 lap before the last completed lap.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Apr 2003, 19:15 (Ref:560338) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 104
|
Steve, Thats what I was thinking - but the response to the incident of the Jaguar was to bring out the safety car.
The red flag appeared (to the tv viewer anyway) to have been in response to the Renault crashing - a subsequent incident. And more annoyingly, the rubbish ITV coverage finished so quickly that more discussion and explaination was not available in the uk. Any other contries out there get more coverage? More info from the FIA or opinions from team bosses? Iain |
||
__________________
Iain |
6 Apr 2003, 19:15 (Ref:560339) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
Well the rules say that Raikkonen is the winner. It's a great shame for Fizzy, what a mone on Kimi. Fizzy's day is coming, and hopefully this will give him a boost, now that he knows he can win a race.
This was Jordan's 200th race by the way Get well soon Alonso. |
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
6 Apr 2003, 19:16 (Ref:560341) | #12 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 354
|
Jordan are allowed to protest aren't they? I really hope they do. If worse comes to worse, Raikkonen and Fisichella should be shared the points - as in 9 points each.
|
||
__________________
Why has my signature been deleted?!? [because you don't seem to understand "3 lines max" - Admin] [b][i]Sun is in the sky, oh why, oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?[/b][/i] |
6 Apr 2003, 19:16 (Ref:560342) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
was Fisi robbed?
Regardless, the sudden red flag of the race can not fall into the regulations, how can you stop a race as the leader was a croner before the line? Fisi earned P1 and would have lasted if they would safety car the Webber incident and then stopped, this was a little NASCAR-esque. Fisichella wins. (although Kimi had a great drive, but he did screw that last lap.)
|
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
6 Apr 2003, 19:16 (Ref:560343) | #14 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 104
|
Tom, do your calculations count the warm up lap? I'm sure it counts towrds the race distance even though it does not count as a numbered lap.
Iain |
||
__________________
Iain |
6 Apr 2003, 19:16 (Ref:560346) | #15 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,208
|
Quote:
I don't think this is an issue. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Apr 2003, 19:17 (Ref:560350) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
Eddie's look on his face was heartbreaking...
|
|
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:17 (Ref:560351) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 374
|
Bogus !
Yet another black eye for F1. The "rules are rules" rationalization doesn't change the ract that Fisi passed fair and square prior to the red flag. Can't have such a high-profile sport governed by stupid rules. Get it right gentlemen !
|
||
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:17 (Ref:560352) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 354
|
ITV had to finish because of following programs.
|
||
__________________
Why has my signature been deleted?!? [because you don't seem to understand "3 lines max" - Admin] [b][i]Sun is in the sky, oh why, oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?[/b][/i] |
6 Apr 2003, 19:18 (Ref:560358) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
I know - it's pretty much spoilt an amazing grand prix for me - it was quite poignant to see Fisi standing there looking up to the podium and praying...
|
|
|
6 Apr 2003, 19:19 (Ref:560360) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 230
|
My answer: Jordan. And not because Im Irish. But..... the rules are the rules - they may not always or ever be right but they are the rules unfortunately.
Best wishes to Alonso for a speedy recovery. |
||
__________________
I need a new signature... |
6 Apr 2003, 19:19 (Ref:560363) | #21 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,208
|
At this stage (without looking into it too much) I think the rules clearly mean Kimi should win.
It is very harsh on Fisi, who doesn't deserve to lose it because of this (ignoring whether he would have gone to win it), but unfortuantly that's the way it is. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Apr 2003, 19:19 (Ref:560365) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 354
|
eein - I've calculated it to whatever ITV have told us the last lap was (the accident on lap 55)
|
||
__________________
Why has my signature been deleted?!? [because you don't seem to understand "3 lines max" - Admin] [b][i]Sun is in the sky, oh why, oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?[/b][/i] |
6 Apr 2003, 19:20 (Ref:560366) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,035
|
The way Martin Brundle read the regulations indicated that the last completed lap would be where the result was declared. IE in this case, the lap Fisi took the lead. He won despite leading only a few corners.
But Barrichello really won the race. Just the car decided to be stupid. |
||
__________________
le bad boy |
6 Apr 2003, 19:20 (Ref:560369) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
Fisichella drove a good race and would have been a justifiable winner but the rules are the rules, and he finished second. If the race went the full distance for all we know he would have had to pit again. Hell the car was on fire in the pits after the red flag. Did he desreve to win? Maybe! I think a lot of guys drove well enough to DESERVE to win. Coulthard certainly got screwed.
|
||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
6 Apr 2003, 19:21 (Ref:560372) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 80
|
74,647 % = 75 %
Article 155 says that the race will be stopped if 75 % of the race is done. Here the race was stoped in lap 53 which give 74,647 % of the whole race. But the rule says that you must take the % ( I don't know how to say this in enlish ) "supérieur" ( in french ). I hope you can understand me.
If not check the FIA rules. |
||
__________________
"race is in my blood, it's a part of me" A.Senna |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you have a V8 Santa??? (merged) | hml2777 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 41 | 3 Jan 2006 12:01 |
BAR Penalty/FIA appeal (merged ,split, merged again!) | Super Tourer | Formula One | 186 | 5 May 2005 13:08 |
FIA GTR Sim (merged) | JMeissner | Virtual Racers | 143 | 24 Mar 2005 11:56 |
What could have been.../this says it all (merged) | fastracer | Formula One | 20 | 7 Apr 2003 14:17 |