|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Dec 2004, 03:59 (Ref:1174964) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
|
auto adjusting rear spoiler
Hello,
I posted about this a long time ago, almost a year ago, but alot of time and revisions have come to pass since then. I have devised a spoiler system that is automatically adjustable by both speed and braking. It is adjustable both height and bite wise to optimize both downforce and braking abilities. I have consulted several manufacturing companies to see what could be done with this and gotten a few quotes for manufacturing specs. For all the racers here, would a spoiler that was auto adjusted for your speed and braking be a worthwhile investment to you. It would be made to optimize your straitaway top speeds and when cornering give you maximum grip. Please post up if you are interested. This could quickly (~6 months, maybe less) become a reality and before I start, would like to know the validity of it. |
||
|
9 Dec 2004, 05:27 (Ref:1174983) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,767
|
There isn't a category in Australia that will let you use a "movable aerodynamic device".
Many people have done this in the past and the only problem was the rulemakers shutting it down. |
||
__________________
"...full of sound and fury, yet signifying nothing...." |
9 Dec 2004, 05:38 (Ref:1174985) | #3 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
|
Ok. Do you know of any series that would? I am checking with SCCA to find out their rules along with BTCC.
I think I could also market this to more of the street crowd and show cars as well. |
||
|
9 Dec 2004, 07:33 (Ref:1175028) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
UK race regs dont allow movable areodynamic devices either, but i can see it would go down wiell with the MAX bra brigade with there sadly customised Saxo's and Nova's
|
||
|
9 Dec 2004, 21:24 (Ref:1175640) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 601
|
its an FIA reg so any country that works with the FIA for its comp rules will probably not allow them...
|
||
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by... |
12 Dec 2004, 00:01 (Ref:1177315) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I think adjustable aerodynamic devices were banned long ago when anair brake system was used on Mercedes LeMans cars in the 50/60s.Correct me if I am wrong but was it not a failure of such a device that caused a Merc to go off into the crowd killing 50 odd people.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
12 Dec 2004, 10:38 (Ref:1177500) | #7 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 16
|
I believe the Le Mans crash of '55 was caused by driver error. The main reason for adjustable aero aids being banned was several failures in F1 during late 60's and early 70's. Also an obvious target to ban as it is so effective in lowering lap-times!
|
||
|
12 Dec 2004, 11:36 (Ref:1177541) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I am sure you are right Chris but there was a Merc from that 50s that did have air brakes that popped out under braking and these were banned I am sure.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
12 Dec 2004, 21:52 (Ref:1177842) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,297
|
Didn't the Chapparal sports car have a rear wing that adjusted under braking.
|
||
|
12 Dec 2004, 22:16 (Ref:1177848) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
and a built in hoover to clean the track!
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
12 Dec 2004, 22:52 (Ref:1177886) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 601
|
and regularly seen wearing a (sort of) PVC skirt
most F1 cars of that ear had a movable wing. think they were normally linked into the brake pedal. personally think that there would be more sense in trying to persuade the FIA to allow you mount the wings on the uprights as was also done in the 60's, thus loosing the majority of the pitch sensitivity problems |
||
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by... |
13 Dec 2004, 04:22 (Ref:1177970) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
Quote:
As far as I am aware, the only organization I have run accross that allows any sort of active or powered aerodynamics is the WKA (world karting association) in the united states the FIA and most other sanctioning bodies ban it I can't speak for all of them though |
|||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
13 Dec 2004, 21:44 (Ref:1178708) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 601
|
the brabham one was a fan for cooling, that happened to just suck all the air from under the car out over the rad. convenient that! lol
just happened to shot blast the cars behind with whatever was under the car too. |
||
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
advertising on the rear of your car | COLIN STUBBS | Racers Forum | 11 | 7 Aug 2005 21:26 |
Rear spoiler changes | 2112 | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 2 | 7 Jan 2005 21:48 |
ACO 2004 Rear Diffuser vs. Toyota Eagle MkIII GTP Rear Diffuser | Dauntless | ACO Regulated Series | 10 | 16 Jul 2003 21:21 |
audi rear spoiler | Es Nes | Sportscar & GT Racing | 7 | 7 Jun 2002 12:30 |
First rear-engined F1-car? | Kjut | Formula One | 17 | 3 Dec 2001 21:12 |