|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Mar 2005, 17:00 (Ref:1244659) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 374
|
The Start!
Haven't seen any mention of it elsewhere but what do people think about the new start procedure when someone (Kimi in this instance) stall on the grid.
Personally I thought it is a good way of keeping the race moving and prevents the sometimes long wait if the start is aborted, especially as on a restart they have a formation lap anyway so it doesn't reduce the number of racing laps. |
||
__________________
"If you can leave black marks from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn, then you have enough horsepower." --Mark Donohue Colin McRae 1968-2007 |
6 Mar 2005, 17:02 (Ref:1244660) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 104
|
Can't see anything bad about it, safe for stalled car, keeps the others cool and keeps us fools from switch'n channels.
|
||
__________________
I've cheered for the prancing horse for 20 years. It's getting hard to do now that they are this fast. |
6 Mar 2005, 17:49 (Ref:1244698) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I was pleased about this when it was first mentioned, and it's worked really well. It's probably the only positive rule change this year. In the past a whole 5 minutes was lost for these situations, and it also put excessive wear and tear on the engines as they were turned off and then fired up again.
|
||
|
6 Mar 2005, 18:24 (Ref:1244737) | #4 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,181
|
One of the few (the only?) excellent rules introduced this year. No need to waste everybody's time and punishing a driver by putting them at the back of the grid after they stall is enough...
|
||
__________________
"And the most important thing is that we, the Vettels, the Bernies, whoever, should not destroy our own sport by making stupid comments about the ******* noise." - Niki Lauda |
6 Mar 2005, 20:54 (Ref:1244922) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Agreed, a good system, better from everyones point of view as it doesn't delay the race, and surely it's gotta be better for the cars as there is less chance of them overheating.
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
6 Mar 2005, 21:16 (Ref:1244955) | #6 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,206
|
I agree to - a good system. It saves a lot of time that was being needlessly wasted.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Mar 2005, 21:17 (Ref:1244956) | #7 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Yep, no complaints on this one.
|
|
|
6 Mar 2005, 21:22 (Ref:1244961) | #8 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,551
|
I think we should record this thread for posterity!! Everyone agrees!!
HOLY WOW BATMAN!! |
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
6 Mar 2005, 23:29 (Ref:1245083) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 936
|
Even I do!
|
||
__________________
I would engage you in a battle of wits, but it is against my moral code to attack the unarmed!!! |
7 Mar 2005, 02:35 (Ref:1245179) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
Wow!
me too,lol |
||
|
7 Mar 2005, 10:20 (Ref:1245401) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 510
|
About the only good rule implemented! I remember thinking with the stalled car 'here we bloody go, have to wait for 10 minutes'.
|
|
__________________
"It was dry for the second go-around. Grice, nervous, worrying about his Bathurst jinx, ran 2:25.9. The amazing Brock, using every last centimetre of bitumen, yet keeping the car straight and balanced and at full noise, came back with a staggering 2:20.0 as if to say: "Match that". And people just shook their heads, bit their lips and wondered who would be second". RIP Peter Brock. 1945-2006 |
7 Mar 2005, 10:31 (Ref:1245414) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Absolutely.
A very good move. |
||
|
7 Mar 2005, 14:09 (Ref:1245617) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,748
|
I like it, munch better than sitting around for 10/15 minutes, waiting for a restart.
|
||
__________________
Renault/MSA Young Photographer of the Year 2006 |
7 Mar 2005, 15:56 (Ref:1245714) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
I guess anyone, no matter how misguided or ill-advised, can get one thing right out of about 10. Good rule change, definitely. Not sure how it'll work when it comes to restarting or resuming races after collisions though.
|
|
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
9 Mar 2005, 15:31 (Ref:1247793) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
I used to love it when there were restarts - build-up of tension for the first start...and then they give you a second one FREE!! Those ten minutes between starts were always tense and exciting - the engine wear adds to the drama, will anyone's engine heat up too much and explode on lap 2? Who knew? I'll miss it...they're turning F1 all slick and Riverdance-y.
|
|
|
9 Mar 2005, 15:39 (Ref:1247803) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Im going to be the black sheep here and say that I prefered the old method.
I actually quite enjoyed the buildup to the start, the excitment, then someone has their hands waving, and its aborted, and you had another 5 minutes to enjoy the pre-race tension. Im sure for TV companies and viewers in general its a good thing, but for me, I quite enjoyed a delayed start... |
||
|
9 Mar 2005, 18:25 (Ref:1247966) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 511
|
I'm in agreement. After watching the hour build up this time, if the old procedure had been in place I would have been really annoyed! I like it. Well done whoever made that up!!
|
||
__________________
Happiness is finding a bar of Dairy Milk Caramel in the fridge. |
10 Mar 2005, 13:23 (Ref:1248523) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
If you want the build up to be 5 minutes longer, turn your TV on 5 minutes earlier.
|
|
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
10 Mar 2005, 14:19 (Ref:1248562) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Very droll, but a good point. TV audiences are easier to keep when the breaks aren't as long - the difference could be even bigger in other situations later in the year.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2005, 14:44 (Ref:1248587) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 233
|
I think, with all the 'bad' rules, this one seems to be the least harmful
|
||
|
11 Mar 2005, 15:29 (Ref:1249642) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to start out | creedaz | Kart Racing | 4 | 2 Mar 2004 23:35 |
So how did you start? | aprescott | Marshals Forum | 46 | 1 Mar 2004 19:25 |
How do I start | BACKHOE | Marshals Forum | 3 | 24 Nov 2003 08:15 |
Where do i start? | Pickled llama | National & International Single Seaters | 9 | 16 Sep 2002 14:04 |
Best Start u have ever seen | pb btcc | Touring Car Racing | 17 | 12 Jul 2001 18:12 |