|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Nov 2007, 14:25 (Ref:2068083) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
Do we need a new prototype championship?
With the growing number of prototypes in Europe and LMS being constantly oversubscribed, I wonder if it is time for a new Interserie-style championship, where those prototype teams that get turned down can race or those who want more than 6 races can drive some additional rounds.
GT-teams can go to FIA-GT or Intl. GT-Open, but for the Protos the LMS is about the only place to play... Or should some of the smaller series like VdeV or Sportscar Challenge think about opening their races for LMP cars? |
||
|
15 Nov 2007, 14:55 (Ref:2068100) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,954
|
We don't need another championship. What would be the point; in the end, entries would be split, and that's never good. Either that, or there would be a distinct gap in quality of field between the series. Not a good idea, imo.
|
||
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with. |
15 Nov 2007, 15:14 (Ref:2068113) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
Nope - the LMS is oversubscibed this year (again) 75 entries for ~50 places. What the ACO have said is that they will gove priority to LMPs as GTs can easily go to another championship as the various national GT championships across Europe will accept everything from GT1 to GT4 cars.
French GT uses GT1 cars, Nordic Supercar, Spanish GT and GT Open will take GT2 cars and I think Italian GT does as well. You could revive the FIA Sportscar Championship as a support for FIA GT but strictly as a place for the protos that don't make it into LMS, but noones going to be interested in a championship thats for the dregs of another. |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
15 Nov 2007, 17:40 (Ref:2068221) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
But how much priority can the ACO give the Prototypes?
They can't go much lower than a total of 18-20 cars for the two GT classes as the GT-fields would become dangerously sparse. So that leaves about 30 spots for the protos. If you split them equally 15/15 for P1 and P2 that isn't that much: If everything works out fine it'll look like this: P1: -2 Audi R10 -2 Peugeot 908 -2 Pescarolo -1 Rollcentre-Pesca -1 Charouz Lola/Pug -2 Courage/Oreca -1 Arena Zytek -2 Creation AIM -2 Epsilon Euskadi ---------------------------- No more room for Chamberlain, Lavaggi, Lister, RML, Barazi or RfH P2: -3 Porsche Spyder (Essex, Horag, Verschuur) -2 Embassy -2 Courage/Oreca -2 Pesca/ Saulnier -1 Bruichladdich Radical -1 Barazi-Zytek -1 Gulf-Zytek -1 Binnie Motorsport -1 Quifel ASM -1 Pierre Bruneau --------------------------------- left out: 2nd Radical, WR, Randacchio, Racing Box, Kruse, T2M. So that's 12 or more cars left out just from the top of my head. And other constructors have announced interest in LMP-racing as well. With a market of just 30 cars for the whole of Europe the market is awfully small for these cars, and for example Lola will need some good luck to sell more than just one of their new Coupes on this side of the pond. Hardly a way to make a profit. In contrast to that there were a good number of championships in the 80s, where one could run Group C cars like the Interserie, the German Supercup or the British C2 championship. Without a bigger market for these cars I fear that a lot of constructors might not sell enough cars to make their business viable, and we'll end up with very few different chassis. |
||
|
15 Nov 2007, 22:35 (Ref:2068429) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
|
How about some no-championship-points races? This could mean less professional / ambitious teams would take part, leaving room for the "enthusiast" teams... kind of like how the Isle of Man TT used to be part of the motorbikes world championships in years long gone... With races preferably in countries with a relatively large fanbase (we're still talking about LMS here...), I suppose that'd be the UK and France for instance? Brands Hatch springs to mind
|
|
|
15 Nov 2007, 23:27 (Ref:2068451) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,399
|
Quote:
Firstly, as has been seen very often, the ACO can decide whatever they like on numbers and split - It's likely that we'll see a reduction in GT1 numbers anyway so that reduces the pressure there. The ACO will certainly favour a larger prototype entry at the expense of GT2 if the opportunity arises. Your "No room for" commentary on LMP1 and LMP2 contains some teams that have no intention of entering the classes you presume - counts out at least one team that has entered all but one race held under the Le Mans Series banner (and has won an LMP title into the bargain), includes several cars that haven't seen the light of day yet in a notional list to replace them, misses out at least one pre-announced programme and potentially several as yet unannounced. Finally though why would anyone want to invest in a new prototype of the complexity and expense of an LMP1 or LMP2 for a second string (at best) championship? A 21st century Interserie might help the second hand market but I genuinely can't see it being any commercial assistance to Lola, Oreca or the rest. The Championships you mention existed in a very different environment - With almost every European country now possesing a national GT racing championship (plus 4 x Europe wide championships at various levels), with VdeV also attracting large grids and those rules spreading too . Where's the attraction in spending massive money for a relatively meaningless Championship? |
|||
|
16 Nov 2007, 08:45 (Ref:2068645) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
What if the organisers from VdeV and the ACO had a little meeting? VdeV has spread into a couple of countries now and the concept seems to be popular. How much more popular would it become for both teams and constructors, both small scale and large, if VdeV were to allow LMP2 entries? It provides a base for new teams and (relatively) unknown constructors to move up towards LM and those who prefer to stay put still get that option. If incentives were offered, such as P2 championship winners getting an LM grid slot, the championship would not be meaningless? One example is that it would have provided Radical with a place to try out their SR9 before taking it to LM and the LMS - if it proved to be good then more customer interest might have arisen? Regarding VdeV's large grids, well didn't Britcar split it's classes into two races to accomodate more GTC/GT3 cars? Or at least move a lower class into a lower-spec support race? Then allow some kind of endurance event where large grids can be happily supported and allow them all to mix together at least once a year? It's wild speculation and not likely to happen, I'm just wondering if it would be a viable option rather than creating a whole new series... |
|||
|
16 Nov 2007, 09:22 (Ref:2068686) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,356
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Nov 2007, 10:49 (Ref:2068759) | #9 | |||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
16 Nov 2007, 10:56 (Ref:2068765) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
I think we need another one just as much as American Open Wheel needs two series...
I would say the LMS needs to consolidate - maybe a better option would be to have open entries to the race weekend, a cut off after quali and for those knocked out, can have a non-championship race or something like that on that same weekend... |
|
|
16 Nov 2007, 14:37 (Ref:2068903) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
What is VdeV?
btw - Is the idea of a single GT class that the manufacturers are proposing that GT1 and GT2 are merged and the cars are built to GT2 rules? Would make sense as they are both tube frame chassis rather than heavily modified road cars like GT3/GT4 That would be good as then GT3 can be the second GT class at LM/ALMS/LMS. |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
16 Nov 2007, 16:55 (Ref:2068998) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
|||
|
16 Nov 2007, 22:52 (Ref:2069229) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
VdeV is mega - but the grids are pretty porky in the french series already
laptimes from Spa this year LMP2 best - Radical SR9/Judd - 2m10.531 LMP2 worst - Lucchini/McLaren - 2m20.563 VdeV CN best - Norma M20/Honda - 2m27.197 Vdev Sprint - Norma M20/Honda - 2m23.565 So you see they can be a bit close but it would be very hairy. VdeV will happily race with GT2/3 though |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
17 Nov 2007, 00:55 (Ref:2069276) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Nov 2007, 01:49 (Ref:2069321) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,264
|
Get a LMP3 series up and running, with VdeV style cars (Ligier etc), and have them race at LMS weekends. Allow anyone who wants to race in the LMS and try to make the grid with set numbers for each class. If a class is undersubscribed, distribute those amongst other classes to get a full grid. Any GT2 or LMP2 entries that doesn't make the grid you kick down into the LMP3 championship. Races on Sundays, broadcasted on MotorsTV ahead of the main race. You get to race even if you failed to make the LMS race, and you're granted some TV coverage. Still don't know what to do about LMP1's and GT1's though.
|
|
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing. |
17 Nov 2007, 03:51 (Ref:2069352) | #16 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 179
|
Something that always has been at the back of my mind, and this is the perfect forum to ask it.
Why does Le Mans limit itself to 50 entries? Its a 13 km track, a 24 hour race, basically flat and open, is the track extremely narrow or is the ACO using this to make it exclusive? Raising the number of entries would solve the problem. |
||
|
17 Nov 2007, 05:16 (Ref:2069368) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Le Mans was limited to 50 entrants because of limited garages. The "temporary" garages were replaced with more full ones, so as of the 2007 race, they have gone back up to 55. Pit/garage space has always limited the entry; Le Mans has never had more than 60 starters.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
17 Nov 2007, 07:48 (Ref:2069393) | #18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,356
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Nov 2007, 10:39 (Ref:2069451) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Nov 2007, 10:55 (Ref:2069459) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,954
|
Quote:
The regulations are pretty fine by me; an oversubscribed headline series proves that. And In response to that long list of cars; I don't think the ACO would let 3 spyders race if there were manufacturers not being allowed to; ie Lucchini. The Lucchini should (hopefully would) get priority over a third porsche. |
|||
__________________
Fred Mackowiecki- the one man I'd love to swap surnames (and talent) with. |
17 Nov 2007, 11:08 (Ref:2069470) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
It would be nice to see them start the GT2 entries from someplace like the signal pits . The track is big enough to take more cars , but im not sure if its worth the expense of constructing once a year pits down there .
|
||
|
17 Nov 2007, 11:18 (Ref:2069479) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 179
|
Over subscription is great for the race as it proves everybody wants a piece of the action, and they obviously do.
I wish a heap more sports car series around the world suffered that affliction. For a solution how about more lead in races around the world with these race results going to select the 50 final entrants at Le Mans? Bit like a world series probably only half a dozen races, but at various tracks around the world. That way everybody gets to race, if they wish they could race at all the lead in races, so even if they end up not selected for Le Mans they still have raced and achieved exposure. It would further promote Le Mans as well. |
||
|
17 Nov 2007, 13:31 (Ref:2069554) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Here's my suggestion.
Tech regs Keep the current class structure, or merge the GT classes. Run several "Le Mans Qualifiers" events (three in North America, three in Europe, one in Asia) before LM24 each year. Each qualifier awards so many places to the top so many in each get their tickets to Le Mans. These LMQ events would be part of the LMES/ALMS as well. For all the events, there would be a number of one hour races to see who gets on the grid and in what position. One for the GTs, One for LMP2s and LMP1s. For each sprint race, there will be a mandatory re-fuel, and each driver must be in the car once. To make it fair, two car teams must make another change (I.E. A hands it over to B in stop 1, B hands it back in stop 2). This year, the European qualifiers would have been Monza and Valencia (plus another), the US would be St Pete, Reliant Park and Miller (don't include Sebring as it's too long for a qualifier and Long Beach was rather short). |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
17 Nov 2007, 15:28 (Ref:2069585) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
The regs, as is, are a contrived farce, and another series with the same rules would be waste of time . Now if the IMSA would simply tell the ACO to go away, we might, and I do emphasize only MIGHT, get something with some pizazz. Bob |
|||
|
17 Nov 2007, 16:51 (Ref:2069627) | #25 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prototype C is here! | Try Hard | Virtual Racers | 229 | 10 May 2004 14:59 |
The term PROTOTYPE | LouisTheShark | Sportscar & GT Racing | 26 | 24 Nov 2003 21:39 |
Prototype Details | PCS74 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 9 Feb 2003 14:22 |
Cadillac Prototype | choked_wasp | Sportscar & GT Racing | 15 | 16 Jan 2002 13:17 |
Prototype? racing | Valentinik | Bike Racing | 3 | 4 Dec 2000 10:41 |