Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Dec 2005, 17:56 (Ref:1490647)   #1
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Rear Suspension woes... Suggestions?

So my race car project is currently going at a slow pace, been busy with other things in my life unfortunately... anyways, I have to work out what I'm going to do with the rear suspension on the car.
The car was a 1993 Mk2 FIAT Uno Turbo. It came out with a beam axle as standard but unfortunately it wasn't a very good design. Flexes extremely badly
and really hampers the cars performance.

What is the general consensus on rear beam axles? Good?? bad??
I saw that the later model Primera's also used rear beam axle, Does anyone
have any pictures of this? How do they fabricate new beam axles for racing?
Do they also use spherical bearings instead of bushes etc?

Since I'm free of any rules or anything, would you recommend I change to something independent at the rear something like independent wishbones with McPherson struts, or even more extreme, unequal double wishbones??

I'm just trying to work out what I should have done.
Look forward to your input.

Regards
Bevan
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 18:07 (Ref:1490656)   #2
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
BTW if anyone is wondering what a Uno Turbo is, this is what the car looked like when it was still road registered and driving everyday.
http://img418.imageshack.us/img418/6...yred0205ma.jpg

I would of like to have bought a new bodyshell from the factory without the usual seam sealer etc, but they are no longer produced here.

Last edited by dtype38; 29 Dec 2005 at 22:03. Reason: Image too large
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 19:16 (Ref:1490687)   #3
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
this is probably better off in the racing technonolgy forum, but eitherway

beam axles such as on your fiat are very common form many FWD cars, Vw golfs and Vauxhall (opel) caviliers, astra's, corsa's and nova's ford fiesta's mk5 escorts to name just a few, all of which have been raced very successfully.

i'm interested in what you mean by flexing, all fwd beam's that incorporate the trailing arms, flex in a twisting mostion, if they didn't you wouldn't have independant rear suspension.

unless you have very substanical fabrication, engineering and design facilities/skills
you are probably far better off modifying what you already have, poly bushes, reinforcing/stiffening the existing beam, fiat uno's certainly here in the uk at least have been successfully converted into fast race cars without resorting to axle transplants
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 19:34 (Ref:1490694)   #4
schomosport
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location:
Bedford
Posts: 121
schomosport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Used to be a fiat race series that ran these and similar, don't know if it still operates. Have a look via www.brscc.co.uk - Fiat racing challenge. This is a clubbie type series and, within the regulations they operate, someone would probably put you in the right direction.
schomosport is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 20:02 (Ref:1490705)   #5
Tim Falce
Race Official
Veteran
 
Tim Falce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
England
Very edge of S E London almost in Kent
Posts: 11,143
Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!Tim Falce is going for a new world record!
You may want to take a look at this. Although it is on a Ford it is the same principle. The guy cut the beam and re-welded it allowing for camber and toe adjustment. It is worth looking at for ideas.
Tim Falce is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 20:05 (Ref:1490707)   #6
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr
this is probably better off in the racing technonolgy forum, but eitherway

beam axles such as on your fiat are very common form many FWD cars, Vw golfs and Vauxhall (opel) caviliers, astra's, corsa's and nova's ford fiesta's mk5 escorts to name just a few, all of which have been raced very successfully.

i'm interested in what you mean by flexing, all fwd beam's that incorporate the trailing arms, flex in a twisting mostion, if they didn't you wouldn't have independant rear suspension.

unless you have very substanical fabrication, engineering and design facilities/skills
you are probably far better off modifying what you already have, poly bushes, reinforcing/stiffening the existing beam, fiat uno's certainly here in the uk at least have been successfully converted into fast race cars without resorting to axle transplants

Hi Graham, Wasnt sure where to post it, mods pls move it to the right section .
Anyways, i meant it flexxes more then what most other cars do,
Im not sure if it makes sense, but like if i had to compare it to say a Vw Golf its nothing close to being as stiff...
I fully understand what you saying that it has to flex but isnt there some point as to how much it can? or the strength of the beam?

this what it looks like on the car:
http://img423.imageshack.us/img423/9081/axle5xj.jpg

It also uses a separate spring/damper combination.
Would Poly bushes really be enough? where it mounts to the body it uses quite a huge rubber bush, im just worried theres gonna be too much movement in that area...

Last edited by dtype38; 29 Dec 2005 at 22:04. Reason: Image too large
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 20:09 (Ref:1490711)   #7
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by falcemob
You may want to take a look at this. Although it is on a Ford it is the same principle. The guy cut the beam and re-welded it allowing for camber and toe adjustment. It is worth looking at for ideas.
Hi, I dont have to modify the rear axle for Toe/camber as i managed to get an ex group n racing axle which they modified to allow this..
But other then that its exactly the same as the std axle.
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 20:36 (Ref:1490725)   #8
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
with a lathe and a bit of work you could convert the beam axle bushes to using taper roller bearings for location, think motorcycle headstock if your not sure what i mean,
ir possibly fit a watts linkage, normally only used with live axles on RWD cars but theres no reason not to do so with a FWD beam
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 27 Dec 2005, 22:53 (Ref:1490787)   #9
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Nylotron works well, and is easy to machine. Make a stainless insert to run through the middle.
Opel Corsa's have a similar beam, anti-roll bat runs through the beam, fixed at each end, which stiffens the beam by means of increasing torsional strength.

You could plate the beam (if it is an open U section) which would stiffen it.

What do your regulations permit?

Rob
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 28 Dec 2005, 02:55 (Ref:1490821)   #10
John Cummins
Rookie
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Ireland
Capital Heights, Maryland, USA
Posts: 5
John Cummins should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The beam is a stamping. I box them in by welding a plate over the opening from side to side. Takes most of the flex our of it and lets the springs do their job a little better.
John Cummins is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 17:35 (Ref:1491518)   #11
ubrben
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
United Kingdom
Birmingham
Posts: 508
ubrben has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
There was a very good article in RE a while back describing the twist beam mods made by Triple Eight for the Astra BTCC cars. A very ingenious system and would remove the need for changing lots of other structure as you'd need to to run struts, etc.

Ben
ubrben is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 17:44 (Ref:1491524)   #12
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by ubrben
There was a very good article in RE a while back describing the twist beam mods made by Triple Eight for the Astra BTCC cars. A very ingenious system and would remove the need for changing lots of other structure as you'd need to to run struts, etc.

Ben
Hi Ben, Where was the article in? where can i get it?

Regards!
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 17:47 (Ref:1491527)   #13
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by racing59
Nylotron works well, and is easy to machine. Make a stainless insert to run through the middle.
Opel Corsa's have a similar beam, anti-roll bat runs through the beam, fixed at each end, which stiffens the beam by means of increasing torsional strength.

You could plate the beam (if it is an open U section) which would stiffen it.

What do your regulations permit?

Rob
Theres no regulations on what can and cant be done to the suspension, so im pretty much free to do what i want
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 18:26 (Ref:1491548)   #14
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Un0Turb0-WP
Theres no regulations on what can and cant be done to the suspension, so im pretty much free to do what i want
ok is it for road, rally or race track use? on the loose or smooth tarmac? is it both a race and a road car?
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 19:08 (Ref:1491566)   #15
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr
ok is it for road, rally or race track use? on the loose or smooth tarmac? is it both a race and a road car?
Racetrack use only, smooth track, 100% Race car, Car is no longer registered to drive on the road.
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 20:19 (Ref:1491596)   #16
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
ok that makes it simple,

a fwd tarmac race car doesn't need anything fancy in the rear suspension dept, as it has little travel and are usually sprung so as to make the rear end loose thus counteracting the natural understeer inherent in FWD cars, i.e they run with the rear end almost solid its not unusual to find fiesta's with 1000lb inch rear springs, and mini's with rear roll bars about an inch thick.

so i would say stick with the fiat beam, improve the bushing materals, the beam can be dramatically stiffened up by welding plates across any open or "L" shape section, and get yourself some decent dampers valved to suit some bloody stiff rear springs.

all this assumes you are going to use some decent grippy tyres, i.e slicks or at least something along the lines of yoko 032's,48's etc
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 21:50 (Ref:1491652)   #17
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hmmmm thanks for the info Graham, I rekon thats the best way to go. Im gonna try and find out if i can somhow have the part where the bush normally goes machined or something so i can use a bearing there instead.

Im just wondering the plate where the spring sits, should i remove that and have a new box section welded there, as the rear will have coilovers instead of a separate spring/damper combination.
Also Im probably going to have to stiffen up the mounting point on the body where the axle bolts to, perhaps tie it into the rollcage etc.

Thanks again for the help
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2005, 21:53 (Ref:1491655)   #18
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Another thing, What about fitting an adjustable Anti Rollbar on the rear so that i can fine tune it even more?? I dont want to make it tooo stiff now? or wont that be an issue?
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Jan 2006, 00:06 (Ref:1492682)   #19
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Anyone got a scan of the suspension article from RE? we dont get RE here and I would really like to see what they done. thx
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2006, 00:08 (Ref:1493086)   #20
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Un0Turb0-WP
Another thing, What about fitting an adjustable Anti Rollbar on the rear so that i can fine tune it even more?? I dont want to make it tooo stiff now? or wont that be an issue?
rear anti roll bars are usually a good idea on a FWD car, a nice stiff rear bar can help traction out of the turns and turn in as it will help to keep the front of the car well planted. having said that i feel its important to get rear springs somewhere near right first, then fine tune with the roll bar.
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2006, 02:22 (Ref:1493148)   #21
Mackmot
Veteran
 
Mackmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
United Kingdom
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,188
Mackmot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Try droop stops. They dont allow the unloaded wheel to travel all the way to the ground and mean you use the weight of that wheel to stabilise the car. It can be done really easily with a bit of ratchet strap webbing bolted to the chassis above and strapping the trailing arm to sit at static ride height position.
Mackmot is offline  
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2006, 19:36 (Ref:1493621)   #22
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by graham bahr
rear anti roll bars are usually a good idea on a FWD car, a nice stiff rear bar can help traction out of the turns and turn in as it will help to keep the front of the car well planted. having said that i feel its important to get rear springs somewhere near right first, then fine tune with the roll bar.
Fantastic!! Once again thanks for all the advice so far Graham I really appreciate it!
I'll take some pictures in the next few days on the axle just so I could get some pointers on what specifically to do. I had a close look at it today and it looks like there are quite a few places that need some beefing up or modification.

Cheers!
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2006, 19:39 (Ref:1493624)   #23
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mackmot
Try droop stops. They dont allow the unloaded wheel to travel all the way to the ground and mean you use the weight of that wheel to stabilise the car. It can be done really easily with a bit of ratchet strap webbing bolted to the chassis above and strapping the trailing arm to sit at static ride height position.
Hmmm havent gotten that far yet, But doesnt the damper have this built in or can you have it built in?
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2006, 20:30 (Ref:1493656)   #24
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Un0Turb0-WP
Hmmm havent gotten that far yet, But doesnt the damper have this built in or can you have it built in?
it all depends on the amount of extension that the damper has, most performance dampers are shorter and achive the same thing as the strap, which maybe coupled with rear anti roll bars is why you often see fwd cars cocking a rear wheel up in the air
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 5 Jan 2006, 11:27 (Ref:1495421)   #25
Un0Turb0-WP
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Australia
Posts: 47
Un0Turb0-WP should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Here are some close up pictures of the rear axle:

The section where the rubber bush mounts: (diameter is roughly 47mm)

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8819/axle0013dr.jpg


The Adjustable Stub Axle (excuse the surface rust.. been standing for a while )

http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6716/axle0023yx.jpg

Underside of the Axle:

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/3453/axle0036xc.jpg

Closeup of the Underside:

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/4446/axle0049tp.jpg

Underside of Spring Pan:

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2261/axle0054nd.jpg

Top View of Spring Pan and trailing arm:

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2889/axle0060sz.jpg

So what do you guys think? Should i remove the spring pan and box that section in better?
Any other idea's??

Thanks in advance!
Bevan
Un0Turb0-WP is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pros and cons of push & pull rod rear suspension TEAM78 Racing Technology 24 2 Jan 2014 20:46
effects of rear suspension on front suspension TEAM78 Racing Technology 11 6 May 2006 23:38
Renault F1 Rear suspension richard_sykes Racing Technology 43 4 Feb 2006 18:03
ACO 2004 Rear Diffuser vs. Toyota Eagle MkIII GTP Rear Diffuser Dauntless ACO Regulated Series 10 16 Jul 2003 21:21


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.