|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Dec 2005, 17:56 (Ref:1490647) | #1 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Rear Suspension woes... Suggestions?
So my race car project is currently going at a slow pace, been busy with other things in my life unfortunately... anyways, I have to work out what I'm going to do with the rear suspension on the car.
The car was a 1993 Mk2 FIAT Uno Turbo. It came out with a beam axle as standard but unfortunately it wasn't a very good design. Flexes extremely badly and really hampers the cars performance. What is the general consensus on rear beam axles? Good?? bad?? I saw that the later model Primera's also used rear beam axle, Does anyone have any pictures of this? How do they fabricate new beam axles for racing? Do they also use spherical bearings instead of bushes etc? Since I'm free of any rules or anything, would you recommend I change to something independent at the rear something like independent wishbones with McPherson struts, or even more extreme, unequal double wishbones?? I'm just trying to work out what I should have done. Look forward to your input. Regards Bevan |
|
|
27 Dec 2005, 18:07 (Ref:1490656) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
BTW if anyone is wondering what a Uno Turbo is, this is what the car looked like when it was still road registered and driving everyday.
http://img418.imageshack.us/img418/6...yred0205ma.jpg I would of like to have bought a new bodyshell from the factory without the usual seam sealer etc, but they are no longer produced here. Last edited by dtype38; 29 Dec 2005 at 22:03. Reason: Image too large |
|
|
27 Dec 2005, 19:16 (Ref:1490687) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
this is probably better off in the racing technonolgy forum, but eitherway
beam axles such as on your fiat are very common form many FWD cars, Vw golfs and Vauxhall (opel) caviliers, astra's, corsa's and nova's ford fiesta's mk5 escorts to name just a few, all of which have been raced very successfully. i'm interested in what you mean by flexing, all fwd beam's that incorporate the trailing arms, flex in a twisting mostion, if they didn't you wouldn't have independant rear suspension. unless you have very substanical fabrication, engineering and design facilities/skills you are probably far better off modifying what you already have, poly bushes, reinforcing/stiffening the existing beam, fiat uno's certainly here in the uk at least have been successfully converted into fast race cars without resorting to axle transplants |
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
27 Dec 2005, 19:34 (Ref:1490694) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 121
|
Used to be a fiat race series that ran these and similar, don't know if it still operates. Have a look via www.brscc.co.uk - Fiat racing challenge. This is a clubbie type series and, within the regulations they operate, someone would probably put you in the right direction.
|
||
|
27 Dec 2005, 20:02 (Ref:1490705) | #5 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
You may want to take a look at this. Although it is on a Ford it is the same principle. The guy cut the beam and re-welded it allowing for camber and toe adjustment. It is worth looking at for ideas.
|
||
|
27 Dec 2005, 20:05 (Ref:1490707) | #6 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Hi Graham, Wasnt sure where to post it, mods pls move it to the right section . Anyways, i meant it flexxes more then what most other cars do, Im not sure if it makes sense, but like if i had to compare it to say a Vw Golf its nothing close to being as stiff... I fully understand what you saying that it has to flex but isnt there some point as to how much it can? or the strength of the beam? this what it looks like on the car: http://img423.imageshack.us/img423/9081/axle5xj.jpg It also uses a separate spring/damper combination. Would Poly bushes really be enough? where it mounts to the body it uses quite a huge rubber bush, im just worried theres gonna be too much movement in that area... Last edited by dtype38; 29 Dec 2005 at 22:04. Reason: Image too large |
||
|
27 Dec 2005, 20:09 (Ref:1490711) | #7 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
But other then that its exactly the same as the std axle. |
||
|
27 Dec 2005, 20:36 (Ref:1490725) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
with a lathe and a bit of work you could convert the beam axle bushes to using taper roller bearings for location, think motorcycle headstock if your not sure what i mean,
ir possibly fit a watts linkage, normally only used with live axles on RWD cars but theres no reason not to do so with a FWD beam |
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
27 Dec 2005, 22:53 (Ref:1490787) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
Nylotron works well, and is easy to machine. Make a stainless insert to run through the middle.
Opel Corsa's have a similar beam, anti-roll bat runs through the beam, fixed at each end, which stiffens the beam by means of increasing torsional strength. You could plate the beam (if it is an open U section) which would stiffen it. What do your regulations permit? Rob |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
28 Dec 2005, 02:55 (Ref:1490821) | #10 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 5
|
The beam is a stamping. I box them in by welding a plate over the opening from side to side. Takes most of the flex our of it and lets the springs do their job a little better.
|
||
|
29 Dec 2005, 17:35 (Ref:1491518) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 508
|
There was a very good article in RE a while back describing the twist beam mods made by Triple Eight for the Astra BTCC cars. A very ingenious system and would remove the need for changing lots of other structure as you'd need to to run struts, etc.
Ben |
||
|
29 Dec 2005, 17:44 (Ref:1491524) | #12 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Regards! |
||
|
29 Dec 2005, 17:47 (Ref:1491527) | #13 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Dec 2005, 18:26 (Ref:1491548) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
29 Dec 2005, 19:08 (Ref:1491566) | #15 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Dec 2005, 20:19 (Ref:1491596) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
ok that makes it simple,
a fwd tarmac race car doesn't need anything fancy in the rear suspension dept, as it has little travel and are usually sprung so as to make the rear end loose thus counteracting the natural understeer inherent in FWD cars, i.e they run with the rear end almost solid its not unusual to find fiesta's with 1000lb inch rear springs, and mini's with rear roll bars about an inch thick. so i would say stick with the fiat beam, improve the bushing materals, the beam can be dramatically stiffened up by welding plates across any open or "L" shape section, and get yourself some decent dampers valved to suit some bloody stiff rear springs. all this assumes you are going to use some decent grippy tyres, i.e slicks or at least something along the lines of yoko 032's,48's etc |
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
29 Dec 2005, 21:50 (Ref:1491652) | #17 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Hmmmm thanks for the info Graham, I rekon thats the best way to go. Im gonna try and find out if i can somhow have the part where the bush normally goes machined or something so i can use a bearing there instead.
Im just wondering the plate where the spring sits, should i remove that and have a new box section welded there, as the rear will have coilovers instead of a separate spring/damper combination. Also Im probably going to have to stiffen up the mounting point on the body where the axle bolts to, perhaps tie it into the rollcage etc. Thanks again for the help |
|
|
29 Dec 2005, 21:53 (Ref:1491655) | #18 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Another thing, What about fitting an adjustable Anti Rollbar on the rear so that i can fine tune it even more?? I dont want to make it tooo stiff now? or wont that be an issue?
|
|
|
1 Jan 2006, 00:06 (Ref:1492682) | #19 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Anyone got a scan of the suspension article from RE? we dont get RE here and I would really like to see what they done. thx
|
|
|
2 Jan 2006, 00:08 (Ref:1493086) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
2 Jan 2006, 02:22 (Ref:1493148) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,188
|
Try droop stops. They dont allow the unloaded wheel to travel all the way to the ground and mean you use the weight of that wheel to stabilise the car. It can be done really easily with a bit of ratchet strap webbing bolted to the chassis above and strapping the trailing arm to sit at static ride height position.
|
||
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel." |
2 Jan 2006, 19:36 (Ref:1493621) | #22 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
I'll take some pictures in the next few days on the axle just so I could get some pointers on what specifically to do. I had a close look at it today and it looks like there are quite a few places that need some beefing up or modification. Cheers! |
||
|
2 Jan 2006, 19:39 (Ref:1493624) | #23 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
|
||
|
2 Jan 2006, 20:30 (Ref:1493656) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
5 Jan 2006, 11:27 (Ref:1495421) | #25 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
|
Here are some close up pictures of the rear axle:
The section where the rubber bush mounts: (diameter is roughly 47mm) http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8819/axle0013dr.jpg The Adjustable Stub Axle (excuse the surface rust.. been standing for a while ) http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/6716/axle0023yx.jpg Underside of the Axle: http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/3453/axle0036xc.jpg Closeup of the Underside: http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/4446/axle0049tp.jpg Underside of Spring Pan: http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2261/axle0054nd.jpg Top View of Spring Pan and trailing arm: http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2889/axle0060sz.jpg So what do you guys think? Should i remove the spring pan and box that section in better? Any other idea's?? Thanks in advance! Bevan |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and cons of push & pull rod rear suspension | TEAM78 | Racing Technology | 24 | 2 Jan 2014 20:46 |
effects of rear suspension on front suspension | TEAM78 | Racing Technology | 11 | 6 May 2006 23:38 |
Renault F1 Rear suspension | richard_sykes | Racing Technology | 43 | 4 Feb 2006 18:03 |
ACO 2004 Rear Diffuser vs. Toyota Eagle MkIII GTP Rear Diffuser | Dauntless | ACO Regulated Series | 10 | 16 Jul 2003 21:21 |